Buri Buri Elementary School in South San Francisco is set to be home to a new set of baseball and soccer fields financed primarily by the partnership between local city and school officials.
South City officials partner on ball field
City, school collaborate to build new baseball, soccer field at Buri Buri Elementary School
Buri Buri Elementary School in South San Francisco is set to be home to a new set of baseball and soccer fields financed primarily by the partnership between local city and school officials.
The South San Francisco City Council is expected Wednesday, Jan. 23, to approve sharing $1 million paid by a residential developer set aside to finance a project improving the city’s quality of life.
Following years of deliberation over best ways to allocate the money, city and school officials both shared their appreciation over the opportunity to collaborate and finally put the payment to good use.
“It’s great. If we could have done it on our own, we would have already. So getting a little assistance from an outside agency like the city is a great model going forward for how to get some of our district issues resolved,” said school board President John Baker.
The South San Francisco Unified School District Board of Trustees approved constructing the new baseball and soccer fields last month, laying the groundwork for the financial approval from city officials.
Under the schematic designs approved by the school board, a new, natural grass baseball field will be constructed and the outfield will be large enough to accommodate a soccer field.
Mayor Karyl Matsumoto also expressed her appreciation for a chance to convert a byproduct of the ongoing residential growth experienced in South San Francisco into a community asset.
“We have to allow the good with the bad and this is one of the feel-good projects that will help the community,” said Matsumoto, nodding to the exhaustion many residents feel with the onslaught of growth throughout South San Francisco over recent years.
The $1 million payment was provided by builder Sares Regis as part of the 2016 approval to construct about 200 units in the Cadence development downtown at the corner of Miller and Cypress avenues.
Since the payment was provided, city and school officials have hosted a series of discussions over ways the money could be spent to serve the best interests of both agencies, and the community at large.
Recommended for you
Ultimately, officials landed on paying toward reconstruction of the fields at the campus where an earlier classroom construction project launched by the school district was poorly executed.
The campus field was long home to a large dirt mount widely recognized as Mount Buri by neighborhood residents who grew frustrated with the grime swept off the pile by wind and spread throughout the area. The issue became so aggravating for nearby residents that the district issued car wash certificates to those affected.
In an effort to smooth over the hard feelings with residents, Baker said school officials recently held a community meeting during which support for rebuilding new fields at the site was expressed. He noted the campus used to host a baseball field, until that space was consumed by classrooms.
Baker also said the field construction would not only yield an asset which could be used by students as well as other members of the community, but construction would likely go more smoothly than some of the classroom building which also roiled neighbors.
“Unlike school construction, where there is a lot of jackhammering and construction through the day, this should be a lot more tolerable and a lot more shorter,” he said.
Though the construction schedule is contingent on approval from the state, Baker said officials are hopeful to break ground on the new field later this year with an eye on it being available for the start of baseball season next year. The project is expected to cost $1.3 million, requiring the school district to fill out the rest of the budget.
For his part, Baker said he is proud the two agencies can come together to offer a community asset deeply appreciated by so many residents.
“This is replacing a field that has long been missing in the community and I think the city and school district are very happy to have it back for the residents of the neighborhood,” he said.
The South San Francisco City Council meets 7 p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 23, in the Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive.
First and foremost, it seems someone thinks they deserve a pat on the back. This is just replacing a field that was there already, actually there were two baseball fields there. Secondly who will this field serve? Is it going to have fencing for an outfield if so how deep is the outfield, will the fencing be permanent will it interfere with the soccer field? Will it have a raised mound? Whats the distance of the mound? Will it have stationary bases or just soft bases that lay on top of the ground? Will the soccer field be clearly marked off? Being natural grass how can this be done? will the soccer field have permanent goals? Will there be grandstands for both soccer and baseball? To me this is just something to appease the people who have been passionate about giving our kids a safe, good place to play. By the way, our baseball league will be holding tryouts this weekend IN SAN BRUNO for the third year in a row because SSF has no field good enough to hold them on, if that's not embarrassing I don't know what is.
"Appeas(ing) the people who have been passionate about giving our kids a safe, good place to play" by giving kids a safe, good place to play, sounds like a win all around, Phil. Many of your questions were answered and/or discussed at the community meetings, where the SSFYBL was represented by Mr. Real and others, but I'll answer a couple easy ones off the top of my head: The plans don't show permanent outfield fencing (but there can be portable fencing like at Alta Loma Park) and the use will be under a similar arrangement as at Southwood: school, than city, as this is replacing the former city-maintained field (as you and the article both mentioned several times). We anticipate bleachers for baseball, but probably not soccer, as this will be a smaller field.
I have coached in SSF for 24 years John, it's clear to me that the you are not aware of history behind my apprehensive attitude. You might not have been in SSF when the deal was made to build both fields at Alta Loma and basically the kids are paying the price for our city getting the short end of that stick. How about Brentwood park? How much did that renovation cost the tax payers? And that park is useless,have you been there? Do you know not one team plays there or practices there? The great minds that had the task screwed that up as well. It won't take long for Buri Buri to become as bad as the rest of our fields if we keep doing the same thing no matter how great the intentions are, I would also expect you to know as much since your son played in our league. And yes we did have our tryouts in San Bruno again and yes it is embarrassing.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
First and foremost, it seems someone thinks they deserve a pat on the back. This is just replacing a field that was there already, actually there were two baseball fields there. Secondly who will this field serve? Is it going to have fencing for an outfield if so how deep is the outfield, will the fencing be permanent will it interfere with the soccer field? Will it have a raised mound? Whats the distance of the mound? Will it have stationary bases or just soft bases that lay on top of the ground? Will the soccer field be clearly marked off? Being natural grass how can this be done? will the soccer field have permanent goals? Will there be grandstands for both soccer and baseball? To me this is just something to appease the people who have been passionate about giving our kids a safe, good place to play. By the way, our baseball league will be holding tryouts this weekend IN SAN BRUNO for the third year in a row because SSF has no field good enough to hold them on, if that's not embarrassing I don't know what is.
"Appeas(ing) the people who have been passionate about giving our kids a safe, good place to play" by giving kids a safe, good place to play, sounds like a win all around, Phil. Many of your questions were answered and/or discussed at the community meetings, where the SSFYBL was represented by Mr. Real and others, but I'll answer a couple easy ones off the top of my head: The plans don't show permanent outfield fencing (but there can be portable fencing like at Alta Loma Park) and the use will be under a similar arrangement as at Southwood: school, than city, as this is replacing the former city-maintained field (as you and the article both mentioned several times). We anticipate bleachers for baseball, but probably not soccer, as this will be a smaller field.
I have coached in SSF for 24 years John, it's clear to me that the you are not aware of history behind my apprehensive attitude. You might not have been in SSF when the deal was made to build both fields at Alta Loma and basically the kids are paying the price for our city getting the short end of that stick. How about Brentwood park? How much did that renovation cost the tax payers? And that park is useless,have you been there? Do you know not one team plays there or practices there? The great minds that had the task screwed that up as well. It won't take long for Buri Buri to become as bad as the rest of our fields if we keep doing the same thing no matter how great the intentions are, I would also expect you to know as much since your son played in our league. And yes we did have our tryouts in San Bruno again and yes it is embarrassing.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.