Editor,
Shame on District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe for his decision not to prosecute the driver who killed 4-year-old Ayden Fang on a downtown Burlingame sidewalk and injured three other children, one on foot and two on bike.
Editor,
Shame on District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe for his decision not to prosecute the driver who killed 4-year-old Ayden Fang on a downtown Burlingame sidewalk and injured three other children, one on foot and two on bike.
Shame on DA Stephen Wagstaffe for not having the courage to announce this controversial decision and instead getting his assistant district attorney take the heat.
Shame on the Burlingame Police Department for rushing to call the crash a “chain reaction” (i.e., unavoidable), making it more difficult to prosecute the driver.
Shame on jurors that fail to convict dangerous drivers when they kill.
Shame on the elected officials who remain silent and inert when three pedestrians die on Burlingame streets in a year.
There is no justice for Ayden and his family. Our legal system and government have failed to protect us. The message is that it is OK to kill, as long as you are behind the wheel of a car.
Mike Swire
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(6) comments
While a horrible incident I am not sure you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the driver knew the victim and intended to murder. I am sure the DA spoke to the family and asked them what they were wanting.
Vehicular manslaughter is charged for negligent driving. There doesn't need to be intent. The DA didn't say the charges weren't merited. They said that they couldn't convince 12 jurors. It is nearly impossible to convince a jury of 12 drivers to convict anything except the most heinous offenses.
Per the SMDJ article, Ayden's family criticized the DA's decision: “We, the family, do not agree with this decision,” Fang said. “If that’s the way [the justice system] is set up, that the DA can make that call without the jury making that call, I think that’s a premature decision [and] unfair for the victim.”
From yesterday's Daily Journal article:
Ayden’s father, Ming Fang, said the family did not agree with the decision, which Baum said was made because the DA’s Office did not believe it could convince all 12 members of a jury that criminal negligence occurred.
“We, the family, do not agree with this decision,” Fang said. “If that’s the way [the justice system] is set up, that the DA can make that call without the jury making that call, I think that’s a premature decision [and] unfair for the victim.”
https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/no-charges-filed-in-the-crash-that-killed-burlingame-boy/article_89c9d6e6-36f7-4adb-9402-bd1723fbca93.html
I don't think there's been any discussion of a murder charge. Yesterday's article mentions vehicular manslaughter, which is defined as the unlawful killing of someone while driving with ordinary negligence, an unlawful act (not a felony), or gross negligence, without malice aforethought.
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/192c/
Thomas - the DA may have spoken with the family but they are reportedly very upset with his decision. As far as we know the driver did not even get a slap on the wrist and the DA left it up to the DMV to take action, if any, on her driving privileges. Remember this when he comes up for reelection.
I clearly missed yesterday's article. The family appear to be upset with all parties involved.
As always "Soft-on-crime" when it comes to vehicular manslaughter cases or as they say:
"If you want to get away with murder, use a car."
What people want to hear in these cases - where a driver ends up in a restaurant (Burlingame), or swimming pool (San Mateo), or ACE Hardware (Redwood City) - is the assurance that these people were put through a rigorous medical exam, a full mental evaluation, and several theoretical and practical driving tests before they get their driver's license back in ca. 3-5 years.
But as CalMatters found out people like our DA here don't even follow up with Sacramento or the DMV and these killers are allowed to kill again and again.
https://calmatters.org/series/license-to-kill/
Or as Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said: "People need to stop using their vehicles as weapons."
Of course, she should have said, "We need to stop allowing people to use their vehicles as weapons. We need better traffic engineers and city council members who care."
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.