Utility executives’ salaries could become tied to their companies keeping electricity rates from rising faster than inflation if new legislation introduced by state Sen. Josh Becker passes. 

Becker, D-Menlo Park, recently introduced Senate Bill 905, a major utility reform package intended to address rising electricity costs and create new standards to measure how well existing energy grids are performing.

Recommended for you

holly@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

Recommended for you

(4) comments

CA Is Burning

This made me think. Perhaps US senators and congressmen should not get paid when there is not a budget, just like DHS employees. One difference though , there would be no back pay once a budget is signed for the senators and congressmen. You snooze you lose. These political games need to stop

Lou

What about the Data Centers that use electricity? How much do they increase our bills? Senator Becker, are you working on that? ......"Northern California (especially the Silicon Valley / Bay Area) — This is the dominant cluster, driven by proximity to tech companies, dense fiber networks, and high demand for low-latency compute. It accounts for the majority of the state's capacity (over 160 facilities in some counts for the broader Northern California market)."

Dirk van Ulden

This is hilarious "also makes it less likely that individuals will invest in clean energy like house electrification and electric vehicles, Becker said." The dear senator is not really addressing the true reason for our sky-high rates. Few ratepayers are aware that the utilities offer energy efficiency programs that are heavily burdened with overhead. There is also a CARE program that allows folks to self report their income level thereby getting major discounts on their utility bills. In some utility regions almost 40% of the ratepayers qualify. Who do you believe is paying for all of this? Becker is a political hack and just caters to cheap solutions for his unaware or perhaps gullible constituents. PG&E's executives run a no-risk organization, yet get compensated as if they were in a competitive space. Perhaps if PG&E, SCE and SDG&E were to return to their core responsibility instead of having to placate the politicians and practicing social engineering, our utility rates would reflect what the market dictates. Senator Beck's efforts are not even band aid.

Lou

Thanks Mr. van Ulden for pointing some of these things out. Per a search..."Over 63% of California's ratepayer-funded energy efficiency and demand response programs fail cost-effectiveness tests, meaning their benefits (like energy savings or emissions reductions) do not justify the costs passed to customers."

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here