Utility executives’ salaries could become tied to their companies keeping electricity rates from rising faster than inflation if new legislation introduced by state Sen. Josh Becker passes.
Becker, D-Menlo Park, recently introduced Senate Bill 905, a major utility reform package intended to address rising electricity costs and create new standards to measure how well existing energy grids are performing.
Perhaps the most eye-catching part of the bill, however, would tie 20% of executive salaries to electricity rates, meaning that if costs rise faster than the rate of inflation over a rolling three-year period, those employees would not receive that portion of their paycheck.
“I started really thinking — what are the incentives here?” Becker said.
This piece of the bill would not apply to CEOs and other positions whose salaries are paid directly via shareholders, but would apply to vice presidents and above who are paid via ratepayers.
Becker, who has tangled with the utility companies in the past in an effort to reduce skyrocketing electricity rates, said he’s expecting pushback but is hoping to keep the provision in the legislation as it works its way through the California Senate.
“They’re not happy about it. They don't want the additional accountability, and they don't want this particular piece of accountability,” he said. “They’re going to fight this one for sure.”
SB 905 also contains provisions to establish performance metrics for the utilities, including measuring reliability, connectivity speed, greenhouse gasses and how effectively distribution grid capacity is being utilized, according to a press release from Becker’s office.
Recommended for you
“Our goal is really, let’s get these clear performance metrics,” Becker said. “We can talk later about what we want to do with them.”
A previous Becker-authored piece of legislation was signed into law last year and aims to revamp parts of California’s utility structure, creating public financing opportunities for large-scale projects and returning climate credits back to customers.
As electricity companies develop the infrastructure to expand services and defend against wildfire, rates have skyrocketed. There’s been a 90% increase for Southern California Edison customers in the past 10 years and a 110% increase for Pacific Gas and Electric customers, including those in San Mateo County, Becker said previously.
The bill passed last year, Senate Bill 254, pushed back on that by limiting utility companies from increasing rates because of wildfire safety investments and expanding access to public financing for transmission projects, although it did establish a continuation account on the Wildfire Fund until 2045 that will require equal contributions from ratepayers and utilities.
The new legislation would take further steps to ensure wildfire-related costs are not dumped on ratepayers, the press release said, in addition to reducing excess utility returns on low-risk investments like undergrounding power lines to reduce wildfire liability.
The issue of sky-high electricity costs not only impacts California constituents who are struggling to pay their bills, but also makes it less likely that individuals will invest in clean energy like house electrification and electric vehicles, Becker said.
“This is a really important bill. One of my most important bills,” he said. “The utility affordability issue is really important throughout the state.”
This made me think. Perhaps US senators and congressmen should not get paid when there is not a budget, just like DHS employees. One difference though , there would be no back pay once a budget is signed for the senators and congressmen. You snooze you lose. These political games need to stop
What about the Data Centers that use electricity? How much do they increase our bills? Senator Becker, are you working on that? ......"Northern California (especially the Silicon Valley / Bay Area) — This is the dominant cluster, driven by proximity to tech companies, dense fiber networks, and high demand for low-latency compute. It accounts for the majority of the state's capacity (over 160 facilities in some counts for the broader Northern California market)."
This is hilarious "also makes it less likely that individuals will invest in clean energy like house electrification and electric vehicles, Becker said." The dear senator is not really addressing the true reason for our sky-high rates. Few ratepayers are aware that the utilities offer energy efficiency programs that are heavily burdened with overhead. There is also a CARE program that allows folks to self report their income level thereby getting major discounts on their utility bills. In some utility regions almost 40% of the ratepayers qualify. Who do you believe is paying for all of this? Becker is a political hack and just caters to cheap solutions for his unaware or perhaps gullible constituents. PG&E's executives run a no-risk organization, yet get compensated as if they were in a competitive space. Perhaps if PG&E, SCE and SDG&E were to return to their core responsibility instead of having to placate the politicians and practicing social engineering, our utility rates would reflect what the market dictates. Senator Beck's efforts are not even band aid.
Thanks Mr. van Ulden for pointing some of these things out. Per a search..."Over 63% of California's ratepayer-funded energy efficiency and demand response programs fail cost-effectiveness tests, meaning their benefits (like energy savings or emissions reductions) do not justify the costs passed to customers."
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
This made me think. Perhaps US senators and congressmen should not get paid when there is not a budget, just like DHS employees. One difference though , there would be no back pay once a budget is signed for the senators and congressmen. You snooze you lose. These political games need to stop
What about the Data Centers that use electricity? How much do they increase our bills? Senator Becker, are you working on that? ......"Northern California (especially the Silicon Valley / Bay Area) — This is the dominant cluster, driven by proximity to tech companies, dense fiber networks, and high demand for low-latency compute. It accounts for the majority of the state's capacity (over 160 facilities in some counts for the broader Northern California market)."
This is hilarious "also makes it less likely that individuals will invest in clean energy like house electrification and electric vehicles, Becker said." The dear senator is not really addressing the true reason for our sky-high rates. Few ratepayers are aware that the utilities offer energy efficiency programs that are heavily burdened with overhead. There is also a CARE program that allows folks to self report their income level thereby getting major discounts on their utility bills. In some utility regions almost 40% of the ratepayers qualify. Who do you believe is paying for all of this? Becker is a political hack and just caters to cheap solutions for his unaware or perhaps gullible constituents. PG&E's executives run a no-risk organization, yet get compensated as if they were in a competitive space. Perhaps if PG&E, SCE and SDG&E were to return to their core responsibility instead of having to placate the politicians and practicing social engineering, our utility rates would reflect what the market dictates. Senator Beck's efforts are not even band aid.
Thanks Mr. van Ulden for pointing some of these things out. Per a search..."Over 63% of California's ratepayer-funded energy efficiency and demand response programs fail cost-effectiveness tests, meaning their benefits (like energy savings or emissions reductions) do not justify the costs passed to customers."
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.