Editor,
Your state legislature passed bill Senate Bill 79 which allows apartment buildings up to seven stories within a half mile of a major transit stop (trains and buses).
Editor,
Your state legislature passed bill Senate Bill 79 which allows apartment buildings up to seven stories within a half mile of a major transit stop (trains and buses).
It presumes lots of people will be using public transportation, which is wishful thinking at best. It prohibits local government from mandating minimum parking requirements if it impacts state-mandated city housing quotas.
San Mateo has more than 15 large development proposals. Larger developments include Hillsdale Shopping Center with 1,670 housing units, Concar Passage (along Delaware Street) with 850 housing units.
And Mollie Stone’s removal with the potential for many units. These and others will be within a half mile from major transit stops.
One example of what’s to come is a smaller development of six stories, 181 units, on North San Mateo Drive, recently and easily approved by the Planning Commission. However, parking would only include 180 spaces allowing one car parking per unit. And what about visitor parking?
The debacle: The number of households with two or more cars has increased substantially from 22% in 1960 to 60% in 2023. The average number of cars per California household is 2.3. So, with all these developments, the developers will not be allowing enough resident parking spaces, meaning more profit for them. That means spillover parking and traffic into your neighborhood if you live a half mile from a major transit stop.
If this upsets you and the quality of your life, contact the San Mateo City Council, and state legislators Diane Papan and Josh Becker, and let them know how you feel.
Gary Isoardi
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Gary - Thank you for your letter as it highlights a significant problem with all of this rapid / over development. No parking required for these structures is insane! Then on top of it they are tearing down grocery stores to build some of these lots. Going forward not only will it be a challenge to park anywhere around here, but also buy groceries. Not to mention the road congestion on our roadways that is already an issue with no foreseeable solution.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.