The Burlingame School District Board of Trustees unanimously approved placing a $100 million bond measure on Nov. 3 ballots at its board meeting June 9.
Some of the school sites in the district are over 100 years old, Superintendent Marla Silversmith said, and one trustee coined a pitch for the bond as the “$100 million bond for the 100-year-old schools,” Silversmith said.
The district is currently being “reactive” to facility needs than proactively and efficiently addressing areas of concern, and the revenue from the bond measure, if passed, could help the district significantly, she said.
While improvements have been made to the district’s schools in recent years, some classrooms still contain “dry rot, leaky roofs and outdated plumbing and electrical systems,” the district’s website said. Funding would also go toward updating science, technology, engineering and math labs.
Improvements included on a project list further detail the modernization that would take place, the replacement of antiquated portable classrooms with permanent facilities, the installment of energy efficient systems and infrastructure, improving school site parking and traffic circulation, and more. The priority will be to address the absolutely necessary, Silversmith said previously.
“Placing a general obligation bond measure before district voters would provide funding to address the identified high-priority capital projects,” a staff report said.
Revenue from the bond measure can only go toward capital improvements and facility needs, and cannot go to salaries or other expenditures. If passed, it would levy $16 per $100,000 of assessed property value per year.
Recommended for you
The district passed its most recent bond, worth $97 million, in March 2020 which levied a $25 tax per $100,000 of assessed property value.
“This is the longest we’ve gone between bonds,” Silversmith said.
In November 2024, voters also approved a parcel tax measure with revenue going toward teachers and academic programs.
Many of the projects and goals outlined in the upcoming bond measure are ongoing maintenance needs and improvements that were similarly outlined in 2020. The district is working on revising its Facilities Master Plan, last updated in 2016, which could inform what the bond dollars will go toward.
Completed projects funded by the 2020 bond include a new play structure at Lincoln Elementary School, a new student recreation center and auditorium modernization at Burlingame Intermediate School, and new classroom furniture districtwide. Some ongoing projects include a new transitional kindergarten building and turf field at McKinley Elementary School and modernization of the district office.
Remaining identified projects include a new administrative building and library at Lincoln, a new library and turf field at Washington Elementary School and new transitional-kindergarten play structures at Franklin and Lincoln elementary schools.
Voters that approve bonds like this, are the ones costing teacher positions and increasing class sizes. Shame on you.
The thing they never tell you about bond measures is that it will cost teachers their job and increase classroom sizes.
The bond measures usually include language like "can't be used for salaries", which is completely dishonest of course.
First of all, the district can always hire third party companies and contractors and pay them with bond money. So of course somebody makes a good living from that money - just not teachers.
Secondly, that bond money requires some 20 or 30 additional headcounts within the district administration to handle the money and the construction itself. The superintendent will hire another assistant superintendent, the lawyer needs 2 more assistants, there will be 2 working in PR, the Facilities Dept wants 5 more people, they need 10 more custodians and ground keepers to maintain the buildings and the new athletic fields they will create, HR wants more headcount too.
If the superintendent isn't cheating (which they could), all these positions need to be paid from the general fund. The Superintendent won't lay off his friends in the District Office, he will cut 30 teacher positions instead.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Voters that approve bonds like this, are the ones costing teacher positions and increasing class sizes. Shame on you.
The thing they never tell you about bond measures is that it will cost teachers their job and increase classroom sizes.
The bond measures usually include language like "can't be used for salaries", which is completely dishonest of course.
First of all, the district can always hire third party companies and contractors and pay them with bond money. So of course somebody makes a good living from that money - just not teachers.
Secondly, that bond money requires some 20 or 30 additional headcounts within the district administration to handle the money and the construction itself. The superintendent will hire another assistant superintendent, the lawyer needs 2 more assistants, there will be 2 working in PR, the Facilities Dept wants 5 more people, they need 10 more custodians and ground keepers to maintain the buildings and the new athletic fields they will create, HR wants more headcount too.
If the superintendent isn't cheating (which they could), all these positions need to be paid from the general fund. The Superintendent won't lay off his friends in the District Office, he will cut 30 teacher positions instead.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.