In my last column I talked about how books can act as mirrors reflecting a reader’s own identity, windows offering views into other lives and sliding glass doors allowing readers to enter new worlds.
Many booksellers, librarians, teachers, publishing industry editors and others working with literature strive to discover and promote diverse books because we believe that reading diverse books helps create a more empathetic, compassionate and peaceful world. I also wrote about the massive rise in attempts to ban books.
Some online comments took issue with me, claiming that book banners were only trying to keep extremely sexual, even pornographic books out of children’s hands. I invite readers to check out books that have been challenged over the years: New Kid, The Adventures of Captain Underpants, Drama, Charlotte’s Web, Harriet the Spy, Julian Is A Mermaid, Melissa, Bridge to Terabithia, And Tango Makes Three, Red - A Crayon Story, Born on the Water, Harry Potter, Roar of Thunder Hear My Cry, In the Night Kitchen, Where the Wild Things Are, Everywhere Babies, Sulwe, Something Happened in Our Town, The Family Book, Lailah’s Lunchbox, and Separate is Never Equal.
Visit PEN America’s website where you can view the thousands of titles people tried to ban from libraries, schools and even bookstores. Yes, you might find some titles that you might not want your children to read, but someone once said “Just because you’re a vegetarian doesn’t mean you get to slap a cheeseburger out of my child’s hands.” Parental freedom, to me, means that parents/guardians are free to establish guidelines with their children on how books are selected and how much supervision they need. Banning books one group disapproves of removes everyone else’s freedom to discover them.
Recommended for you
As a bookseller, I often give a lot of thought of on which shelf a book will land. Publishers do, generally, include age recommendations on books, but those are just guidelines. I’ll often be chatting with an adult about a book that they’re considering for someone under the age of 18 and I’ll mention specific themes or even particular scenes in the book, just in case there might be something that might not be appropriate for that particular reader. It makes me equally happy to have a parent say “Nope, that’s not going to work for my kiddo,” or “Oh, she’s gonna love that.”
I fondly remember a San Mateo LGBTQIA+ Pride celebration where I had a huge display of children’s books and a woman walked over and started pointing at titles, noting which ones were in her child’s school. Another woman stood nearby scowling. She came closer and asked “Are you saying that all of those books are in your kid’s school?” I was worried that she disapproved of that until she said, “none of those books are in my child’s school and that upsets me.” The moms compared notes and the previously-scowling mom said “I’m going to try to move my kid to your school!”
Schools and classrooms are as diverse as the people who run them so of course there will be differences. Last week my husband and I were honored to be invited to Arbor Bay School in San Carlos for an author’s tea. It is a magical place for K-8 students with learning differences. The upper elementary children had worked hard on various writing genres all year and the school compiled their best fiction into a book we offered to feature in our shop. As one boy read his story to us his father stood nearby. He took me aside and said, “a year ago my son couldn’t have read a single word like that.” And here he had written a whimsical tale of fiction he joyfully read to us out loud. While many schools demand that students learn to learn the way the school teaches, Arbor Bay seems to strive to figure out how each child learns and adapts their teaching to help each child thrive. Our goddaughter, who has Down syndrome, had attended that school years ago after having a very difficult time in other schools. Like the boy who had just read to us, at Arbor Bay she blossomed and found joy in learning. Believe it or not, many books about children with disabilities, including Down syndrome, have been challenged/banned.
If America’s beautifully diverse children, like those at Arbor Bay, walk into a classroom, library or bookstore why shouldn’t they see themselves, people different from them, and other worlds in the books they can discover on the shelves? Mildred Pitts Walter, a former San Mateo resident, whom I mentioned in my last column, who pioneered including black characters in her children’s books, passed away last week at 102. May her memory inspire us to keep working for a country and world that celebrates diversity.
Craig Wiesner is the co-owner of Reach And Teach, a book, toy and cultural gift shop on San Carlos Avenue in San Carlos. Follow Craig: craigwiesner.bsky.social.
I'll try again Craig: "Curating a library (or children's book store) for age appropriate material with literary value is not 'banning books.'" When you decline to select a certain book for your store are you "banning" that book?
Maybe someday I, like Craig, will get to write a DJ column where I say words to support whatever argument I am making with no regard for whether these words are true or exaggerated.
Obviously no one has time to research all the books you claim have been "banned" (in a right wing crusade against diversity in literature according to your prior column.) This is a "massive rise" in book banning you say? Beloved children's books "banned" by crazy right-wingers? Let's look at a few on your list:
-Where the Wild Things Are: Challenged shortly after publication in 1963 due to "dark themes" Never banned, I read it as a child and read it to my kids.
-Harriet the Spy was challenged in 1983 at a school board meeting in Xenia, Ohio (where?), some argued the book encouraged children to disrespect their parents.
-Charlotte's Web was challenged in 2006 by a small group of extreme religious parents who didn't like the talking animals. Again, never banned, I and both my kids read this book at school and many times at home.
Anyone can challenge a book anywhere, but to borrow a phrase - "cherry picking" examples in very specific local areas from decades ago to support a "massive rise" of right wing book banning is disingenuous at best. Very typical for a Craig column.
And while I'm honored that my prior comment spurred this column, of course you don't address the book I mentioned, This Book is Gay, which was removed from the BIS school library. Do you think that extremely sexually graphic book is appropriate for middle schoolers?
Nor did you mention the common left wing book challenges. You list "Harry Potter" which many on the left now want removed from stores and libraries due to the author JK Rowling's belief that men can't become women and sex is real.
ACLU attorney Chase Strangio sought to ban Abigail Shrier’s book, "Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters", stating that stopping its circulation was "100 percent a hill I will die on".
Maybe the DJ can start publishing a regular column refuting Craig's bi-weekly ramblings full of falsehoods. Jon, you have my contact info.
Craig: In my family, we have quite an extensive library of books! Even the dining room I added years ago, has turned into a library. However, we have never hidden any books from the children (son and daughter). It was all available to them, if interested. Even the bible, as horrible and inhumane a killer manual it is, was available to them, although they never showed any interest, both growing up as freethinkers.
Since MichKosk has handled the heavy lifting, I’ll take another approach… Here we go again with Mr. Wiesner cherry-picking examples in an attempt to sell his viewpoint. Sorry, Mr. Wiesner, nobody is buying. Using Mr. Wiesner’s logic, we may as well open up alcohol and tobacco sales, casinos, driving, bars, etc. to kids. Why shouldn’t children be exposed to the diversity adults can experience, not just in books, but in life? BTW, MichKosk, it may take a few columns to refute Craig’s bi-weekly ramblings. It is much easier to make stuff up than to correct the lies. I, for one, would enjoy your columns.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
I'll try again Craig: "Curating a library (or children's book store) for age appropriate material with literary value is not 'banning books.'" When you decline to select a certain book for your store are you "banning" that book?
Maybe someday I, like Craig, will get to write a DJ column where I say words to support whatever argument I am making with no regard for whether these words are true or exaggerated.
Obviously no one has time to research all the books you claim have been "banned" (in a right wing crusade against diversity in literature according to your prior column.) This is a "massive rise" in book banning you say? Beloved children's books "banned" by crazy right-wingers? Let's look at a few on your list:
-Where the Wild Things Are: Challenged shortly after publication in 1963 due to "dark themes" Never banned, I read it as a child and read it to my kids.
-Harriet the Spy was challenged in 1983 at a school board meeting in Xenia, Ohio (where?), some argued the book encouraged children to disrespect their parents.
-Charlotte's Web was challenged in 2006 by a small group of extreme religious parents who didn't like the talking animals. Again, never banned, I and both my kids read this book at school and many times at home.
Anyone can challenge a book anywhere, but to borrow a phrase - "cherry picking" examples in very specific local areas from decades ago to support a "massive rise" of right wing book banning is disingenuous at best. Very typical for a Craig column.
And while I'm honored that my prior comment spurred this column, of course you don't address the book I mentioned, This Book is Gay, which was removed from the BIS school library. Do you think that extremely sexually graphic book is appropriate for middle schoolers?
Nor did you mention the common left wing book challenges. You list "Harry Potter" which many on the left now want removed from stores and libraries due to the author JK Rowling's belief that men can't become women and sex is real.
ACLU attorney Chase Strangio sought to ban Abigail Shrier’s book, "Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters", stating that stopping its circulation was "100 percent a hill I will die on".
Maybe the DJ can start publishing a regular column refuting Craig's bi-weekly ramblings full of falsehoods. Jon, you have my contact info.
Craig: In my family, we have quite an extensive library of books! Even the dining room I added years ago, has turned into a library. However, we have never hidden any books from the children (son and daughter). It was all available to them, if interested. Even the bible, as horrible and inhumane a killer manual it is, was available to them, although they never showed any interest, both growing up as freethinkers.
Since MichKosk has handled the heavy lifting, I’ll take another approach… Here we go again with Mr. Wiesner cherry-picking examples in an attempt to sell his viewpoint. Sorry, Mr. Wiesner, nobody is buying. Using Mr. Wiesner’s logic, we may as well open up alcohol and tobacco sales, casinos, driving, bars, etc. to kids. Why shouldn’t children be exposed to the diversity adults can experience, not just in books, but in life? BTW, MichKosk, it may take a few columns to refute Craig’s bi-weekly ramblings. It is much easier to make stuff up than to correct the lies. I, for one, would enjoy your columns.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.