Editor,
A columnist who strips one candidate of his credentials while lavishing another with every honorific has already told you where he stands — before a single fact lands on the page.
Editor,
A columnist who strips one candidate of his credentials while lavishing another with every honorific has already told you where he stands — before a single fact lands on the page.
That’s Mark Simon’s June 4 column on the California primary.
Steve Hilton served as director of Strategy for British Prime Minister David Cameron at 10 Downing St. — one of the most senior advisory roles in British government. Yet Simon describes him as “Republican nominee of TV talk show host Steve Hilton.”
What a candidate is known for and what he has accomplished are two different things.
By Simon’s logic, George Stephanopoulos isn’t a Clinton White House senior adviser. He’s a morning show host.
Becerra, however, gets a different treatment entirely: “former state attorney general and U.S. health secretary.”
If Simon applied the same logic to Becerra, he wouldn’t be a former attorney general and health secretary. He’d be the also-ran who finished dead last in the 2001 Los Angeles mayoral race with 6% of the vote.
Same column. Two candidates. One gets his résumé. One gets his TV credits.
Doug D’Anna
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. D’Anna, but there should be no surprise. In one of Mr. Simon’s columns last month, Mr. Simon showed us that for him, the Deem party takes precedence over anything else. (Not that long time readers hadn’t already figured that out years ago.) If anything, we should be surprised if Mr. Simon isn’t biased in favor of Deems. If that happens, you might want to look out a window and see if pigs are flying. Meanwhile, get used to more of the same from Mr. Simon since Mr. Hilton has made the final cut. Vote Hilton. We’ve seen how well former TV stars have done, including Reagan and Trump. And we’ve seen how former Dems have done – catastrophically.
Thank you, Doug for this perspective. While I’m not a fan of Steve Hilton’s, you make a valid point that news reporting should be fair and balanced. Maybe if it was, TerenceY wouldn’t be bashing Democrats all the time, and I might not be triggered by hearing Trump or MAGA. That could actually lead to a better world!
good points. Right wing politics flourish when centrist parties fail to deliver. There is only one centrist party now in California and the Bay Area.
And if they delivered, we would see:
- bike lanes for children and Safe-Routes-To-School everywhere.
- San Mateo schools wouldn't be segregated "by choice".
- Renewable energy produced in the county. There would be a microgrid.
- solid public transit and not one expensive highway-widening after another.
- less money going to car-centric developments that makes people lazy and addicted.
- lower health care costs ... again, those go right back to car-centric developments.
- quality-of-life.
none of that is happening. Democrats keep spending on free driving and free parking as if their political lives were depending on certain 'sponsorships'. And most likely they are.
Basically the people on the right go nutes, because CA Democrats aren't delivering and are all about 'self-pleasuring' these days.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.