I am commenting about the article in the Journal on June 17 titled “San Mateo is poised to reappoint the current Planning Commission chair.” The appointment is for Seema Patel. Your article is not an objective summary of the events at City Hall during the City Council special meeting.
The Journal reporter neglected to accurately present what occurred at the nearly two-hour meeting. I was there. I took notes. There were more than 10 persons who testified on behalf of Ms. Patel pointing out her expertise in planning, and another group of more than 10 persons who testified against her based on affronts by Ms. Patel against community members, which amount to ethical breaches. In addition, nearly 20 people urged the Council to reopen the process, restart, reassess, re-interview. The council, by a vote of 3-2, decided to reappoint Ms. Patel. My complaint is about the accuracy of reporting.
Thank you for calling this out, Ms. Grajewska. I agree the important public comments were not reported in the article but should have been. Such an outcry from the public seems newsworthy.
Mr. Newsom seemed coerced by Adam Loraine into making Seema Patel the first alternate. Wasn’t that odd? Especially since Mr. Horsman quickly resigned. Maybe we need some independent journalists to look into this.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Thank you for calling this out, Ms. Grajewska. I agree the important public comments were not reported in the article but should have been. Such an outcry from the public seems newsworthy.
Mr. Newsom seemed coerced by Adam Loraine into making Seema Patel the first alternate. Wasn’t that odd? Especially since Mr. Horsman quickly resigned. Maybe we need some independent journalists to look into this.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.