A recent study shows that Highway 101 congestion has improved since the express lanes were implemented, though some leaders and experts cast doubt that the data paints an accurate portrayal of traffic patterns.
Securing congestion data pre- and post-express lanes has been a long-awaited request from transit leaders and advocates, given the San Mateo County Transportation Authority is contemplating whether to expand the express lane north of Interstate 380.
The current express lanes, which opened several years ago, stretches 22 miles on Highway 101 from the Santa Clara County line to Interstate 380. Starting around 2020, the TA began conducting research on expanding the project, either by converting an existing lane into an express lane or constructing a brand-new one.
Many transit advocates have opposed the plan, especially the latter option.
The recent study presented at the TA board meeting April 2 showed that the average speed in the express lanes increased between 7-13 mph between 2018 to 2024, and the general purpose lane speeds increased by 1-7 mph.
Other key findings showed a 16% reduction in vehicle hours traveled — suggesting drivers are arriving to their destinations quicker — and a 22% reduction in peak period carbon dioxide emissions. Southbound express lane users saw a 22% reduction in travel time, while northbound users saw 13% reduction.
But some leaders and transit advocates have questioned the data and methodology surrounding the congestion improvements.
Recommended for you
Board Member Carlos Romero, also a member of the East Palo Alto City Council, said that widening the highway by adding another lane tends to induce demand, which over time, will start to eat up the earlier gains, also adding he had concerns over the study’s methodology.
“I think it’s problematic to have this data that is a little scrambled. We have data that is pre-COVID … but I’m not sure that we have reached [a steady state] post-pandemic,” Romero said. “I’m very much hoping that perhaps in a year from when this study was done, we do a follow up with cleaner data.”
About a month ago, transit leaders also discussed express lane ridership performance, which raised another concern about inaccurate data, specifically related to carpooling. Drivers with three or more passengers can travel the express lanes toll-free by toggling a declaration on their FasTrak. Two-person carpools receive a 50% discount, while single-occupancy vehicles pay full price, which averaged $4.05 northbound and $5.29 southbound last quarter.
The approach is mostly based on an honor system, which has cast doubt on the accuracy of the carpooling data among some, given that nearly half of express lane trips are toll free. The TA has been concerned about the accuracy for some time, but recent data from the California Highway Patrol confirms the issue isn’t resolving on its own and may necessitate more investment in better monitoring and tracking capabilities.
The initiative to potentially expand the express lanes north of Interstate 380 is in the environmental and preliminary design phase, which is now expected to be completed in summer 2027.
Correction: The story has been updated to show that the average speeds increased, not decreased, in the express lanes and general purpose lanes between 2018 and 20224.
YES, please build more lanes. We need the ability to easily move around the Bay Area. The idea that adding more lanes just creates more travel demand is really silly - it is not the government's job to prevent people from taking a new job that is better for their family by making the commute to the new job really horrible. The government should be facilitating mobility and the ability for citizens to take the best jobs available and enjoy their leisure time by traveling wherever they want quickly. Make things better, not worse.
- How many wars has the US started in the name of bikes and bike lanes?
- How many wars has the US started in the name of cars and car lanes?
The same Democrats that are constantly asking for more highway widenings (Board of SMCTA and SamTrans) and spending public transit funding on "grade separation projects" benefiting cars, are also the ones asking you to pay more taxes to protect Public Transit (Board of SamTrans and Caltrain). They also want more money for Sea Level Rise (Papan). And they will still ask for more money to lift those highways because of King Tides.
And the same San Mateo Democrats are also the ones constantly fighting bicycle infrastructure, and lately e-bikes.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
YES, please build more lanes. We need the ability to easily move around the Bay Area. The idea that adding more lanes just creates more travel demand is really silly - it is not the government's job to prevent people from taking a new job that is better for their family by making the commute to the new job really horrible. The government should be facilitating mobility and the ability for citizens to take the best jobs available and enjoy their leisure time by traveling wherever they want quickly. Make things better, not worse.
Please name a highway where additional lanes didn't increase driving. It is simple economics.
Quick question.
- How many wars has the US started in the name of bikes and bike lanes?
- How many wars has the US started in the name of cars and car lanes?
The same Democrats that are constantly asking for more highway widenings (Board of SMCTA and SamTrans) and spending public transit funding on "grade separation projects" benefiting cars, are also the ones asking you to pay more taxes to protect Public Transit (Board of SamTrans and Caltrain). They also want more money for Sea Level Rise (Papan). And they will still ask for more money to lift those highways because of King Tides.
And the same San Mateo Democrats are also the ones constantly fighting bicycle infrastructure, and lately e-bikes.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.