Editor,
NPR reports that Trump has agreed to reduce tariffs on India from 25% to 18%, in return for India’s agreement to stop buying Russian oil, and to buy American and Venezuelan oil, instead.
Editor,
NPR reports that Trump has agreed to reduce tariffs on India from 25% to 18%, in return for India’s agreement to stop buying Russian oil, and to buy American and Venezuelan oil, instead.
This is a good deal and a bad deal. It’s good, in terms of punishing Russian aggression in Ukraine. But it’s bad, in terms of Trump’s presumption to control Venezuelan oil.
It’s also bad, in terms of the huge environmental impact of shipping oil halfway around the world, when India’s immediate neighbors produce more than enough to satisfy the needs of South Asia.
Yes, all decisions come down to politics. But given the fact that we all have to live and breathe on planet Earth, the first consideration in the global oil trade must be to burn as little as possible. And that begins with shipping it the shortest possible distance, given the preposterous “gallons per mile” of diesel oil tankers.
Mark Behrend
East Palo Alto
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Let's see Mark. How many more Russian and Ukrainian soldiers need to die if only to keep the oil supply chain shorter? Don't you realize that starving Putin's oil revenues has an effect that is far greater than the elusive climate change death rate? TDS again?
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Behrend, but like it or not, folks only talk the talk about saving the world from fossil fuels and carbon emissions instead of walking the walk. For evidence, review the participation of annual COP climate conferences. Folks are taking 400+ private jets and who knows how many public jets to attend a climate conference to lecture people on saving the world while they burn fossil fuels and emit carbon to their hearts’ content. I wouldn’t say all decisions come down to politics. It appears some decisions come down to economics. BTW, I believe California imports about 30% of their crude oil from Iraq and the Middle East. Why? When California can drill, baby, drill. If California doesn’t care much about the health of the planet why would anyone else?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.