The city of San Mateo is exploring a sales tax measure this November, citing long-term structural deficits that could start impeding basic city services and infrastructure needs. 

The city is already facing a $14 million projected deficit this fiscal year, which ends in June, and a continuous shortfall in the future.  

Recommended for you

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Terence Y

Folks, I’d pretty much guarantee the decision is already made and the city WILL add a sales tax measure to the ballot. I’d also add that sales tax proceeds will go towards ever-increasing government and union salaries, pensions, and benefits. Note that Councilmember Nash says the quiet part out loud, ““Sales tax gives us an opportunity to get revenue from visitors, and people who are not just members of the city, so it helps to spread the burden a little bit more.” The key words are “get revenue” because this tax is basically a money grab, and “spread the burden” because that’s what it is, a burden. Vote NO on this, and any, upcoming sales tax measures to subsidize government workers. If you have a change of heart, don’t worry, more sales and other tax measures will show up, over and over and over...regardless if this one passes.

joebob91

If the City wants to raise more revenue, it needs to convince the voters that it will use their money wisely.

This means not spending $1.5+ million to increase free street parking in front of 56 homes on Humboldt street (while removing safety infrastructure). That's almost $30,000 per home. Surely there are better uses of $1.5 million for the other 40,000 households in the City.

easygerd

... and let's not forget, the majority of these households had asked for more safety infrastructure and not less. The majority of these 56 homes don't want some car collector block the front of their home where there could be a nice little bike lanes their kids could be using to get to their school or the park.

This was all messed up by YIMBY politicians like Amo Lee, Diana Papan, Adam Lorraine and Nicole Fernandez. Shame on them for not protecting our children.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here