Editor,

In the Jan. 26 edition of the San Mateo Daily Journal, John Marty wrote a response to my online challenge to also mention the downsides of the Venezuelan raid to capture Maduro. Unfortunately, the exchange shows how difficult it is for people on opposite sides to communicate lately. John replied focusing solely on Maduro himself. I was thinking about the larger picture that followed the raid. As I mentioned previously, the raid was a tactical success — no question about it. Many parties wanted Maduro gone — not just Republicans as Mr. Marty pointed out, even some Latin American neighbors.

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Terence Y

Hilarious. Mr. Kristofferson submitted a recent comment and now submits a Letter to the Editor containing the majority, if not all, of his comment. Is this another example of what it means to double-dip? Hey, Mr. Kristofferson, why don’t we ask what the majority of Venezuelans think about Trump’s successful action in capturing a criminal? Don’t over 90% of Venezuelans support our (yes, our) great President Trump’s actions? As for the vast majority of Americans, the people have spoken and elected the greatest President, Trump, of our lifetimes, twice. If folks aren’t happy with Trump’s actions, where are the dozens of lawsuits seeking activist judges to force Trump to return Maduro to Venezuela?

As for Governor Carney, why would we listen to Carney? He doesn’t represent the US. Doesn’t Canada exist because they fall under the US security umbrella, as well as EU nations? If Canada and EU nations want to wriggle out of the US security umbrella, they can go for it. Meanwhile, they can talk the talk and we know they’ll fail to walk the walk – kind of like climate change folks. In the meantime, I’m still not tired of winning. Have a Trump-tastic day! BTW, if you want to expand your list of media sites, the New York Post recently activated the California Post (https://nypost.com/ca/). Be forewarned that their articles may puncture your misplaced stances on most key issues.

Jorg

NATOs success is underscored by the fact that no NATO-country has been attacked by another country during its 80 years since the inception. Perhaps that could be the reason why Trump wants us out of the alliance, or doesn’t he think that deeply?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here