Editor,
The opposition to the proposed 69-bed sobering station to be located at the edge of the exclusive Baywood neighborhood does not surprise me, given the NIMBY attitude of the local residents, but it does disgust me a bit.
Editor,
The opposition to the proposed 69-bed sobering station to be located at the edge of the exclusive Baywood neighborhood does not surprise me, given the NIMBY attitude of the local residents, but it does disgust me a bit.
Where would they like it placed if not there? Councilmember Nash is just as guilty of NIMBYism as those she represents, in my opinion, for advocating support for the center — but placing it somewhere else. The patients of this center have drug and/or alcohol issues, they are not pedophiles, predators or felons. They just need a break.
Back in the early 1970s, my father, along with five other AA members, started a nonprofit program called Project 90. It gave recovering alcoholics 90 days to live in a managed residential facility (yes, in similar neighborhoods) staying sober and prior to living on their own. When it was both absorbed by another nonprofit and ultimately disbanded a few years ago, P-90 had over 20,000 graduates who went on to live clean and sober lives. I am not aware of any problems caused to the communities in which P-90 operated over those 40-some years. Just a whole lot of success stories.
So, I say to Ms. Nash and her constituents, why don’t you give the center a chance, give the Horizon management the opportunity to show you how well they can change more lives for the better!
Forest Elliott
Redwood City
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
This author's comments are not based on any meaningful facts. WHY? Because there are none other than Noelia Corzo voted to give a private company Horizon $2M of taxpayer monies without disclosing to the public any meaningful details about the plan. This is not about opposing treatment services. This is about officials making "silent-undercover" sweetheart deals and a lack of public transparency. We should all be worried about this kind of dark behavior.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Elliott, but a treatment center is not a pop-up space where it is there one week and gone the next. A treatment center is kind of like installing bike lanes. Once it is there, it is difficult to remove. Especially since the “seed/free” taxpayer money to install them in the first place is gone. How about instead of testimonials and opinions, we get real data as to what the impact of sobering stations has had on a neighborhood or community? Has crime increased in the neighborhood? Amount of calls to the police? Police actions? Let’s get some data before we potentially change more lives for the worse, especially those who live in the neighborhood. Let’s ensure the location of the sobering stations is vetted properly and not a case of getting “free” money.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.