San Mateo’s Humboldt Street bike lanes will stay for now, city councilmembers decided during a hotly-anticipated meeting where a surprising, long-term proposal was also discussed — studying the potential for turning it into a one-way street. 

The bike lanes, which were constructed in 2022, necessitated the removal of around 200 parking spaces in the North Central neighborhood, to the frustration of residents who say they are unable to find parking near their homes in the already-congested area. 

Recommended for you

holly@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Terence Y

Poor Humboldt residents. Is anyone surprised city councilmembers opted to kick the can down the road while, of course, proposing the obligatory “high-level feasibility study” when no action is taken? Of note in the article, “bike safety advocates, who are supportive of the lanes, turn out en masse at the meeting.” Now did they displace folks who attempted to attend the meeting in person? A tactic used at other meetings to minimize opposition?

Folks, another reminder that you get the government you voted for. Take note of where these councilmembers stand and what they haven’t done for you, because for folks on Humboldt, their concerns were noted but nothing will be done. Recalls? Meanwhile, you would think that with the hullabaloo regarding bike lanes these past few years, there would be multiple studies that have already determined the volume of cyclists vs. drivers on the road. Data that decisions could be made on instead of feelings or who screams the loudest. Again, poor Humboldt residents.

joebob91

It's obvious that you didn't attend the meeting or watch the City's presentation. There were far more Humboldt and North Central residents speaking in attendance in favor of the bike lanes instead of the $1.5M parking plan. The City's survey indicated that ~70% of N. Central residents support the bike lanes.

easygerd

TBot is absolutely correct about the "hullabaloo regarding bike lanes".

The scientific expression would be "bikeshedding": https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/bikeshedding

For any highway widening, politicians like Rob Newsom, Diane Papan or Nicole Fernandez would approve within 5 min. They don't understand the complexities of "congestion" at all so they don't want to deal with it. They just do what lobbyists and donors tell them to do. But they do know they don't like bicycles or children and certainly not children riding bicycles in bike lanes.

The Law of Triviality makes them focus on the small project they think they understand better. But they clearly proved to the community they should ALL be recalled. This was pathetic by the city manager and all city council members.

This was an embarrassment to the whole Democratic Party. They got fooled by the MAGA minority and took the bait. Which Democrat outside of California would dare to take down "climate action" bike lanes and expect to stay in office?

Newsflash for Rob Newsom: any politicians that specifically says "we are not doing this to bully children" had "bullying children" on his mind the whole time.

Taso

You are spot on Terrence. The bike advocates should be embarrassed for their childish demands at the expense of taxpayers and those living in an Equity Priority Community. It's an embarrassment that the city has failed its residents to benefit 4 to 5 bike trips per day

easygerd

For once "Transportation Equity" did win against "Corporate Interest'.

Dan Walters is correct when he points out that CA Democrats just can't shed the Corruption.

https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/california-persistent-government-corruption/

And neither can San Mateo Democrats. This time they did the right thing but you could see Nicole Fernandez and Rob Newsom physically hurting while doing so. They wanted this to go the other direction. The One-Way Humboldt Street is a fantasy project - the city manager Alex K. will come up with all kinds of excuses to fight that.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here