San Mateo’s Humboldt Street bike lanes will stay for now, city councilmembers decided during a hotly-anticipated meeting where a surprising, long-term proposal was also discussed — studying the potential for turning it into a one-way street.
The bike lanes, which were constructed in 2022, necessitated the removal of around 200 parking spaces in the North Central neighborhood, to the frustration of residents who say they are unable to find parking near their homes in the already-congested area.
Bike safety advocates, who are supportive of the lanes, turned out en masse at the meeting Monday, where councilmembers were set to provide direction on whether they wanted the lanes to be taken out.
The lanes will remain, and councilmembers also expressed support for mitigating measures to calm traffic and alleviate parking issues on Humboldt, like lighting improvements and a potential residential parking program.
But the city should also be considering a real long-term, sustainable solution that will offer residents both the parking and bike lanes they need for traffic and pedestrian safety, Councilmember Danielle Cwirko-Godycki said, who first voiced the one-way street proposal. She acknowledged the proposition would be a major, $10 million investment.
“I believe it deserves serious consideration, because it addresses the root of this conflict,” she said.
A majority of councilmembers expressed support for a high-level feasibility study that would determine whether the idea could be implemented in the area, as well as community outreach to determine support. As the city is facing a deficit, questions remain around how the project would be funded.
“I do believe making Humboldt one way, keeping the bike lanes there and adding all the safety enhancements I mentioned is the best way to give the community the safety they deserve, as well as the two things people have asked for — parking and bike lanes,” Councilmember Lisa Diaz Nash said.
City staff did extensive community outreach on the Humboldt bike lanes issue prior to the meeting, with online and in-person surveys showing largely majority support for keeping the lanes as is rather than alternatives such as removing the lanes and turning parallel streets, Fremont and Idaho, into bike boulevards.
Recommended for you
Those efforts, which would have included increased stop signs, traffic circles and speed humps to make the roads safer as a detour for bicyclists, would cost the city upward of $1 million.
Deputy Mayor Nicole Fernandez, who represents the North Central neighborhood, first expressed support for restoring some form of parking and said she’d heard from a wide variety of constituents in the historically under-resourced area who were frustrated and negatively impacted.
“Street parking is important to service workers, senior residents who live with disabilities, families who’ve reached out to me to talk about how missing parking spaces affect their lives, how unsafe folks feel walking a half mile to their homes at night,” she said.
Some residents, like former Mayor Claire Mack, shared similar stories during public comment.
“I hope the bike riders in San Mateo can ride until the wheels come off their bikes,” she said. “In the meantime, there are many residents in North Central San Mateo who need some place to park their cars.”
The issue is one of equity and access, Fernandez said, though she also ultimately expressed support for a long-term solution like a one-way road as a bold, visionary move.
Those advocating for the bike lanes during the meeting emphasized they were a public safety need, particularly for commuters and young people traveling to and from nearby schools.
“There is a problem and the City Council needs to solve it, but taking our bike lanes, which we just got, is not the way to do it,” resident Dylan Tweney said. “Please don’t take away the one good thing the city has done for North Central in the past few years.”
Poor Humboldt residents. Is anyone surprised city councilmembers opted to kick the can down the road while, of course, proposing the obligatory “high-level feasibility study” when no action is taken? Of note in the article, “bike safety advocates, who are supportive of the lanes, turn out en masse at the meeting.” Now did they displace folks who attempted to attend the meeting in person? A tactic used at other meetings to minimize opposition?
Folks, another reminder that you get the government you voted for. Take note of where these councilmembers stand and what they haven’t done for you, because for folks on Humboldt, their concerns were noted but nothing will be done. Recalls? Meanwhile, you would think that with the hullabaloo regarding bike lanes these past few years, there would be multiple studies that have already determined the volume of cyclists vs. drivers on the road. Data that decisions could be made on instead of feelings or who screams the loudest. Again, poor Humboldt residents.
It's obvious that you didn't attend the meeting or watch the City's presentation. There were far more Humboldt and North Central residents speaking in attendance in favor of the bike lanes instead of the $1.5M parking plan. The City's survey indicated that ~70% of N. Central residents support the bike lanes.
TBot is absolutely correct about the "hullabaloo regarding bike lanes".
The scientific expression would be "bikeshedding": https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/bikeshedding
For any highway widening, politicians like Rob Newsom, Diane Papan or Nicole Fernandez would approve within 5 min. They don't understand the complexities of "congestion" at all so they don't want to deal with it. They just do what lobbyists and donors tell them to do. But they do know they don't like bicycles or children and certainly not children riding bicycles in bike lanes.
The Law of Triviality makes them focus on the small project they think they understand better. But they clearly proved to the community they should ALL be recalled. This was pathetic by the city manager and all city council members.
This was an embarrassment to the whole Democratic Party. They got fooled by the MAGA minority and took the bait. Which Democrat outside of California would dare to take down "climate action" bike lanes and expect to stay in office?
Newsflash for Rob Newsom: any politicians that specifically says "we are not doing this to bully children" had "bullying children" on his mind the whole time.
You are spot on Terrence. The bike advocates should be embarrassed for their childish demands at the expense of taxpayers and those living in an Equity Priority Community. It's an embarrassment that the city has failed its residents to benefit 4 to 5 bike trips per day
And neither can San Mateo Democrats. This time they did the right thing but you could see Nicole Fernandez and Rob Newsom physically hurting while doing so. They wanted this to go the other direction. The One-Way Humboldt Street is a fantasy project - the city manager Alex K. will come up with all kinds of excuses to fight that.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
Poor Humboldt residents. Is anyone surprised city councilmembers opted to kick the can down the road while, of course, proposing the obligatory “high-level feasibility study” when no action is taken? Of note in the article, “bike safety advocates, who are supportive of the lanes, turn out en masse at the meeting.” Now did they displace folks who attempted to attend the meeting in person? A tactic used at other meetings to minimize opposition?
Folks, another reminder that you get the government you voted for. Take note of where these councilmembers stand and what they haven’t done for you, because for folks on Humboldt, their concerns were noted but nothing will be done. Recalls? Meanwhile, you would think that with the hullabaloo regarding bike lanes these past few years, there would be multiple studies that have already determined the volume of cyclists vs. drivers on the road. Data that decisions could be made on instead of feelings or who screams the loudest. Again, poor Humboldt residents.
It's obvious that you didn't attend the meeting or watch the City's presentation. There were far more Humboldt and North Central residents speaking in attendance in favor of the bike lanes instead of the $1.5M parking plan. The City's survey indicated that ~70% of N. Central residents support the bike lanes.
TBot is absolutely correct about the "hullabaloo regarding bike lanes".
The scientific expression would be "bikeshedding": https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/bikeshedding
For any highway widening, politicians like Rob Newsom, Diane Papan or Nicole Fernandez would approve within 5 min. They don't understand the complexities of "congestion" at all so they don't want to deal with it. They just do what lobbyists and donors tell them to do. But they do know they don't like bicycles or children and certainly not children riding bicycles in bike lanes.
The Law of Triviality makes them focus on the small project they think they understand better. But they clearly proved to the community they should ALL be recalled. This was pathetic by the city manager and all city council members.
This was an embarrassment to the whole Democratic Party. They got fooled by the MAGA minority and took the bait. Which Democrat outside of California would dare to take down "climate action" bike lanes and expect to stay in office?
Newsflash for Rob Newsom: any politicians that specifically says "we are not doing this to bully children" had "bullying children" on his mind the whole time.
You are spot on Terrence. The bike advocates should be embarrassed for their childish demands at the expense of taxpayers and those living in an Equity Priority Community. It's an embarrassment that the city has failed its residents to benefit 4 to 5 bike trips per day
For once "Transportation Equity" did win against "Corporate Interest'.
Dan Walters is correct when he points out that CA Democrats just can't shed the Corruption.
https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/california-persistent-government-corruption/
And neither can San Mateo Democrats. This time they did the right thing but you could see Nicole Fernandez and Rob Newsom physically hurting while doing so. They wanted this to go the other direction. The One-Way Humboldt Street is a fantasy project - the city manager Alex K. will come up with all kinds of excuses to fight that.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.