Editor,

Lodi Councilman Shakir Khan was recently found to have in his possession 41 completed mail-in ballots while having 71 registered voters connected to his home address. Must be quite a house!

Recommended for you

(6) comments

edkahl

Thank you for your article - the logic for Voter ID is over whelming. You can't drive a car or a slew of lesser things without an ID so why should you be able to do one of the most important things like voting without an ID?

ClashFan

I would like to update one of the citations and comment on the others.

The Electoral Studies paper was published in 2014 by Jesse Richman, PhD, of Old Dominion University. In 2017, more than 200 political scientists signed a letter rejecting the findings, stating, “"The scholarly political science community has generally rejected the findings in the Richman et al. study and we believe it should not be cited or used in any debate over fraudulent voting," One issue is the survey on which Richman used was wholly unsuited to study noncitizen voting. In 2024, James Agretsi manipulated the data from Richman’s study and used it to claim "between 10% and 27% of noncitizens are illegally registered to vote." It was this paper that was picked up by conservative influencers, and from there reached the Heartland Institute, where it was picked up by conservative websites. Elon Musk retweeted one of the headlines in circulation at that time and garnered tens of millions of views: “Up to a third” of illegal immigrants are registered to vote according to new study: “Potentially high enough to overturn the will of the American people.” This was not true, Agretsi stands by the claim. Richman himself believes the best estimate of the registration rate by noncitizens in the US is less than 1 percent. So it is deceiving to state the claim was published in a scholarly journal. It is the interpretation of the data by one man, and the data on which it is based has been refuted. The fact-checking website Snopes investigated the matter and communicated directly with Richman and Agretsi (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/noncitizens-registered-to-vote/).

The roughly half million California residents disqualified for jury duty in prior one-year periods was for various reasons, and there is no evidence they were all registered voters. Sources for jury duty rolls include those who pay taxes or have a driver’s license or state ID, which does not require citizenship status (https://azcir.org/news/2025/03/14/were-half-a-million-registered-california-voters-disqualified-from-jury-duty-because-they-were-noncitizens-no/).

The FBI seizing records of a local elections agency is not proof of any wrongdoing. The Carter Center monitored the recount in Georgia and found nothing out of ordinary, concluding that the process “should serve as the basis for increased confidence in Georgia’s electoral system.”

An Mr. Khan--what was he thinking?

Jmarty

Clash Fan,

You are correct that study was done in 2014, well before the massive influx of illegals during the Biden years. So, only God knows,how many illegals are voting.

The SAVE ACT is not a partisan question. It's a structural one. If you can't secure your elections, you cannot secure anything built upon those elections

ClashFan

Thank you Jmarty. I agree with you our elections need to be secure for everyone no matter their political affiliation. I'm proud our current system is without peer. It's not broken. The only thing the bill would do is put up barriers to millions. Unfortunately, there are forces in this country that have been trying to oppress the vote for decades. That is what I oppose. The study was done on data wholly unsuited for the study of noncitizens voting. The headline Musk tweeted is manipulating the public because it is simply not true.

Terence Y

ClashFan, if you agree that our elections need to be secure for everyone no matter their political affiliation then you should be for passage of the SAVE Act. Then you say you’re proud of the current system because it’s not broken yet you’ve linked to sites that show the system is broken. As for your barrier to millions of voters, that’s a Democrat talking point because anyone who is an American citizen can easily access their birth certificate, marriage certificate, etc. And if forces in this country have been trying to oppress the vote for decades, then why have the number of voters in presidential elections increased since at least 1980? It’s obvious the vote hasn’t been oppressed. BTW, didn’t Chuck Schumer, in 1996, demand Voter ID and proof of citizenship? I believe he did.

Terence Y

Thanks for your letter, Mr. Marty, highlighting voter fraud occurring in our backyard. If this is happening in Lodi, imagine the sheer amount of voter fraud occurring in other California cities. To wit, investigative reporter Nick Shirley is in California exposing voter fraud, including irregularities in voters per location, over 30 people registered to vote in a mail store, and voters over 125 years old. Let’s hope Congress does the right thing and passes the SAVE Act. As backup, we have Trump’s Executive Orders on election integrity.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here