Speed reductions on Burlingame’s local roads could be one solution to reduce vehicle-related fatality and injury in the city, including along major arterials with higher crash rates like California Drive and Broadway, consultants said during a presentation on the city’s Vision Zero plan.
Vision Zero sets a goal to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries in Burlingame by 2040, consultant Dana Weissman of Fehr & Peers said during a Feb. 3 presentation to the City Council on a draft plan.
The presentation came as the Burlingame community has been contending with the impact of three fatal vehicular crashes in the span of a year, including the death of 4-year-old Ayden Fang on Donnelly Avenue.
“The timing on this is really important and good, and we are moving in the right direction. I’m excited about it,” Councilmember Donna Colson said. “I really think speed reduction is going to be critical.”
Part of the Vision Zero plan is identifying hot spots for traffic collisions, which included California Drive, Rollins Road, Broadway, Trousdale Drive and much of downtown, including Donnelly and Primrose avenues. Improving infrastructure along these streets, particularly at dangerous intersections, is another Vision Zero priority.
Although 30% of these incidents in the city occur on El Camino Real, it’s not included in Vision Zero planning because it’s a state-owned road, though major renovations on the highway are currently underway.
Consultants identified 40 streets in the city that could be studied for speed reductions. That includes reducing speed on California Drive from Burlingame Avenue to Broadway to 15 mph and from Broadway to Murchison Drive to 25 mph. Reducing speed on Broadway from Balboa Avenue to Vancouver Avenue from 20 to 15 mph was also up for consideration.
Downtown was not included in the speed reduction study because speed data wasn’t presently available, Weissman said, though Councilmember Desiree Thayer asked it, as well as roads around schools, potentially be included in future plans.
Recommended for you
“I do think there's some opportunity downtown and around the schools, if we’re allowed to reduce those speeds without having to do studies,” she said. “I would love to integrate some of the safe routes to school work.”
E-bike and e-scooter education and regulation is another component of the plan, and could include age restrictions, code clarification, accelerated constructions of protected bike lanes, and promoting the selling of compliant class 1-3 e-bikes at local vendors. Speed reductions could benefit safety concerns in this arena as well, Thayer said.
“Tying this e-micromobility in with speed reductions as well — when we reduce the speed on a road to say 20 mph, it’s for the bicycles as well,” she said.
It could be pertinent to examine automated speed enforcement mechanisms and increased stop signs as a way to regulate speed reductions, Mayor Michael Brownrigg said.
“As we look at ways to enforce slower streets, we will absolutely not have the police to do all the enforcing residents will start asking us to do,” he said. “I’d like the report to have a summary of various different technology that exists … so we have a menu of different automated ways to enforce.”
Areas where cars and pedestrians are in proximity should also be a priority, Brownrigg said.
“Focusing on downtown — both downtowns — and schools where pedestrians are walking, not always paying attention, and cars are traveling is really important,” he said. “I would like to focus on areas where pedestrians and cars are both very proximate to each other and very frequent.”
Thumbs up for speed limit reductions. They will require traffic calming elements to maximize compliance, however.
Thumbs down to more e-bike rules and regulations at the local level. Let the state take care of the technical challenges. Let's make the streets safe for kids instead of making rules to keep the kids off of the streets because they aren't safe.
If the City isn't writing many speeding tickets for 6,000 pound SUVs, how many speeding tickets do you think that they will write for kids on e-bikes? Most of the bikes aren't even capable of exceeding speed limits.
Yosemite ... "E-bikes" by definition of the law cannot exceed certain speed and certain power. And they are to be treated like any regular bicycle.That has been the federal law since 2002.
The moment "e-bikes" exceed the 1hp limitation they become e-Motos and are to be treated like mopeds would. Police in California has been allowed to enforce this for the last 23 years already. They just never did.
So why are the lawmakers going after kids on e-bikes rather than their own police forces for not enforcing?
This is performative action, where Bay Area Democrats pretend there is an issue they can decisively attack and "fix". Of course there is no real issue here, just "kids being kids". And Democrats seem to hate that - I don't know why.
When pedestrians and people on bicycles keep dying on their streets, San Mateo Democrats just went into hiding.
Now there is one "townhall" after another by Democrats on how to fix this issue that researchers keep telling them is a non-issue.
First Josh Becker, then Diane Papan, now Jackie Speier and Ray Mueller.
None of them scheduled a town hall meeting after the death of a 4 year old in Burlingame being killed by reckless driving. But fixing problems that don't exist ... Becker, Papan, Speier, and Mueller are all over those.
San Mateo Democrats: don't believe them until you see it.
Burlingame and especially Colson and Pappajohn are known for bullying children. That's why they basically have no Safe-Routes-To-School .. .and these are the people hanging around schools.
My guess is there will be lots of Performative Action towards children and e-bikes, maybe some complaints about Waymo....
... but all the other measures - like speed reductions around schools - will just magically disappear.
Did you guys know that Marc Berman from Menlo Park is aiming to increase school zone speed limits from currently 15mph to 20mph? All in the name of safety of course.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
Thumbs up for speed limit reductions. They will require traffic calming elements to maximize compliance, however.
Thumbs down to more e-bike rules and regulations at the local level. Let the state take care of the technical challenges. Let's make the streets safe for kids instead of making rules to keep the kids off of the streets because they aren't safe.
Until the bike lobby's undue influence in the legislature is overcome, cities are left to do what they can for public safety.
If the City isn't writing many speeding tickets for 6,000 pound SUVs, how many speeding tickets do you think that they will write for kids on e-bikes? Most of the bikes aren't even capable of exceeding speed limits.
Your first premise is fallacious because it's given as a universal without evidence. The second is fallacious because it is known to be untrue.
Yosemite ... "E-bikes" by definition of the law cannot exceed certain speed and certain power. And they are to be treated like any regular bicycle.That has been the federal law since 2002.
The moment "e-bikes" exceed the 1hp limitation they become e-Motos and are to be treated like mopeds would. Police in California has been allowed to enforce this for the last 23 years already. They just never did.
So why are the lawmakers going after kids on e-bikes rather than their own police forces for not enforcing?
This is performative action, where Bay Area Democrats pretend there is an issue they can decisively attack and "fix". Of course there is no real issue here, just "kids being kids". And Democrats seem to hate that - I don't know why.
When pedestrians and people on bicycles keep dying on their streets, San Mateo Democrats just went into hiding.
Now there is one "townhall" after another by Democrats on how to fix this issue that researchers keep telling them is a non-issue.
First Josh Becker, then Diane Papan, now Jackie Speier and Ray Mueller.
None of them scheduled a town hall meeting after the death of a 4 year old in Burlingame being killed by reckless driving. But fixing problems that don't exist ... Becker, Papan, Speier, and Mueller are all over those.
Watch here: https://youtu.be/jnNQEO6U2J8?t=2931
San Mateo Democrats: don't believe them until you see it.
Burlingame and especially Colson and Pappajohn are known for bullying children. That's why they basically have no Safe-Routes-To-School .. .and these are the people hanging around schools.
My guess is there will be lots of Performative Action towards children and e-bikes, maybe some complaints about Waymo....
... but all the other measures - like speed reductions around schools - will just magically disappear.
Did you guys know that Marc Berman from Menlo Park is aiming to increase school zone speed limits from currently 15mph to 20mph? All in the name of safety of course.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.