Matt Grocott

“To be or not to be, that is the question.” Or so it was for William Shakespeare in his play, “Hamlet.” But Shakespeare lived in a different world, in a different time. Had he lived today, his question more likely would have been, “To vax or not to vax?”

If he were to fall under the mandate of my fellow column writer, Sue Lempert, the question wouldn’t even have been allowed. One would be vaccinated and like it. Without it, participation in society would be severely limited. As she wrote in her column: “If people refuse to get vaccinated unless there is a valid medical reason, or to wear a mask if required, they need to pay a price.”

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Cindy Cornell

My only question for the author is to wear or not to wear? I'd like to know what the author is doing about that. At least we all know what he looks like so we can cross the street if he's coming - sans mask. And, when it comes to equating this issue to freedom of choice when it comes to abortion, there's a whole lotta anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers out there who transmitted the virus to living human beings who subsequently died or, like my brother, been permanently damaged for the remainder of his life.

Tafhdyd

Mr. Grocott,

I don't have a problem with your present position about not getting vaccinated due to your health concerns. I did get my vaccinations recently and I also waited for some time due to different health concerns. I was not going to be the first in line.

The real question is will you get the vaccination once it is approved fully and taken off the emergency use authorization?

Terence Y

Mr. Grocott – thank you for another great column. I won’t be surprised when letters are printed with personal attacks and entreaties that you be censored. Thanks for your testimonial. Meanwhile, I’d like to hear opinions about the 3+ million confirmed Californians who have contracted and have recovered from COVID. Their antibodies are probably more effective than the jab. Per Ms. Lempert will they be severely limited since they can’t show proof of vaccination? Or will they find a picture of a CDC card and print it out as proof of vaccination? As for people on the fence, wait for the reward money to go up considerably before thinking about it. We already know CA is desperate - just how desperate?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here