Editor,
Green energy is a very costly proposition for California because we still have to maintain an entire fossil fuel backup system to ensure always on power for when there is no sun or wind. As the Moss Landing Power Plant demonstrated, lithium batteries can’t store utility scale power without catching fire.
Estimates are in the hundreds of billions to build out green energy in California which will be paid for by already overtaxed Californians. But if California can “hold its horses” there are some green energy projects that promise to deliver less costly always on green energy. One is the ACES power plant project finishing up development in Utah. It would make and store green hydrogen in the summer made from solar energy to generate always on power without carbon dioxide emissions.
Ed Kahl
Woodside
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Kahl, and for highlighting the alternative energy source development in Utah. Ultimately, though, these projects only operate as an additional source but will never scale to replace fossil fuels to any significant degree. Any fossil fuel usage reduction in the US would result in other countries taking up the slack, happily. If greenies were really serious about so-called “green” energy, we would be building nuclear power plants, perhaps 100s. But then the money greenies are siphoning from taxpayers would decrease, perhaps completely. The only green they’re interested in is in cash money.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.