Districtwide student housing at College of San Mateo is inching closer to becoming a reality after the community college district’s Board of Trustees approved a $61.85 million contract with developers who intend to break ground in the spring.
The proposed housing facility will provide 316 beds to first-generation, low-income and housing-insecure students attending any of the three colleges within the San Mateo County Community College District.
Providing housing is just one of the many wraparound services the district looks to provide its students, board President Wayne Lee said.
“Our mission is student first,” Lee said. “We find that providing wraparound services helps students graduate, and housing is just one component, a very important one,” Lee said.
The contract was awarded to BHM Construction LLC, which has experience building university campus housing and proposed a contract for $6.3 million less than the construction cost estimate of $68 million, according to a staff report.
The district initially requested for state funding in 2023, and earlier this year was awarded just under $56 million to support the design and construction of student housing. The initial proposal proposed 310 beds but was able to increase slightly during the design period, according to a staff report.
In addition to the state’s funding, sourced by the Statewide Affordable Student Housing Program launched by the state’s community college office in 2022, the district will invest approximately $10 million into the project, according to a staff report.
Recommended for you
At a town hall hosted by state Sen. Josh Becker, D-Menlo Park, on Dec. 9, Chancellor Melissa Moreno said the student housing will provide another level of support that builds on that same mission of the district’s offering of Free College, and making higher education accessible to all.
“It’s going to allow for many of our students to be able to have a place to live,” Moreno said. “About 70% of students statewide are housing insecure, so this is a real problem, and we’re happy to build housing on our land at CSM to help our districtwide students.”
Of the 116 community colleges in California, only 16 currently offer on campus student housing.
The housing units will vary, ranging from semi-suite shared bedrooms to studio and four-bedroom apartments, according to the district. Rents will be affordable, Moreno said, and since the district owns the land it will be built on, the facility will be a “self-supporting program.”
“The students will benefit from very low rents and we will benefit from having the funding to bring in the supports, and support students in everything they need for their housing experience,” Moreno said.
Amenities for students are still being finalized, but Moreno said it may include a shuttle service to help students access their campuses if they’re attending Cañada College in Redwood City or Skyline College in San Bruno.
That is quite interesting. As a community college beneficiary myself, I find it puzzling that we would now have to provide for housing for locals as well? Will it come with a door-dash, uber and a cleaning service? Wait a minute, the sponsor mentioned that nationally a percentage of college and university students have housing issues, but if these students are local county residents, why would they need housing that their parents or guardians should provide? Another reason why we will never get out of the trough syndrome; just give it away without considering the consequences. Just get ready for another cry baby story that the CSM needs more funding.
Well-said, Mr. van Ulden. I wonder how these colleges are going to evict students after they’ve graduated. Or perhaps students will decide to never graduate and stay in student housing forever. I won’t be surprised if instructors, aides, college personnel and employees call dibs on student housing and they should come first. Perhaps they’ll using housing as a bargaining point else they’ll strike. And request substantial raises so they can live in the area. As a side note, I wonder how many change orders the developer will submit to recoup the remaining $68 million they didn’t get.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
That is quite interesting. As a community college beneficiary myself, I find it puzzling that we would now have to provide for housing for locals as well? Will it come with a door-dash, uber and a cleaning service? Wait a minute, the sponsor mentioned that nationally a percentage of college and university students have housing issues, but if these students are local county residents, why would they need housing that their parents or guardians should provide? Another reason why we will never get out of the trough syndrome; just give it away without considering the consequences. Just get ready for another cry baby story that the CSM needs more funding.
Well-said, Mr. van Ulden. I wonder how these colleges are going to evict students after they’ve graduated. Or perhaps students will decide to never graduate and stay in student housing forever. I won’t be surprised if instructors, aides, college personnel and employees call dibs on student housing and they should come first. Perhaps they’ll using housing as a bargaining point else they’ll strike. And request substantial raises so they can live in the area. As a side note, I wonder how many change orders the developer will submit to recoup the remaining $68 million they didn’t get.
Should we get rid of all the sports and arts programs as well?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.