Editor,
Mayor Michael Brownrigg and the councilmembers are wholly wrong in voting against a variety of trees on Easton Drive in Burlingame.
Editor,
Mayor Michael Brownrigg and the councilmembers are wholly wrong in voting against a variety of trees on Easton Drive in Burlingame.
Maintaining the status quo simply because trees were planted 250 years ago in this spot wildly misses the point of serving the needs of one’s community. Anyone who’s ever driven along El Camino in Burlingame knows the trees have caused the pavement to undulate and stick-up to the point where parts of the road are traffic hazards. So, perhaps with 250 years of hindsight, people might realize this isn’t the place to plant trees that grow to enormous sizes and endanger our roads and safety. Did you see the multiple trees that were felled across El Camino earlier this year, which took days to clear.
But, sure, a meaningless history of eucalyptus trees that serves no one is more important to Brownrigg — and the councilmembers who sided with him — than making streets safer for traveling. Seemingly, it’s more important for them to do something over again simply because that’s the way it’s always done instead of stepping back and questioning why things are done and who they benefit.
Variety is the spice of life and Burlingame’s leadership seems awfully milquetoast with this vote.
Dan Myers
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
I could not agree more. Replanting invasive eucalyptus trees is not only bad for the environment, it's dangerous, and all for the sake of colonization history.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.