This is in response to “A significant moment,” in the Nov. 11 edition of the Daily Journal and “Property rights” in the Nov. 12 edition of the Daily Journal. Both letters complain that recent rent control measures are the government imposing itself on private property rights.
One of the purposes of government is to protect society as a whole from the selfish acts of the few. Rental unit owners are presumably already charging “market rates” as they were in an open market prior to recent legislation, so spiking rents right now is akin to usury.
Let’s look at other ways government usurps “property rights.” They prevent:
• Your neighbor from building a multi-story extension on their home right on your property line;
• Your neighbor playing their music at full volume in the middle of the night;
• The removal of catalytic converters and mufflers from cars;
Recommended for you
• The replacement of commercial property without review, approval and permits;
• The blight of property; and
• The removal of trees from property.
The list goes on, but I don’t hear you complaining about any of those. What about protecting renters against opportunistic landlords who want to take advantage of a loophole to line their pockets by financially destroying their tenants?
I don’t care where you stand on “rent control” overall, but this is evil and wrong. Yes, most landlords are good people, but most landlords won’t be jacking up rents this month. This policy really only blocks the bad actors from behaving badly.
Keep believing your nonsense Mrs. Goldstein. What happened with AB1482 inserts itself in private contract between two parties and lets the government dictate what can be charged. That is a big leap it to the socialist world, picking winners and losers and seizing private property.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Keep believing your nonsense Mrs. Goldstein. What happened with AB1482 inserts itself in private contract between two parties and lets the government dictate what can be charged. That is a big leap it to the socialist world, picking winners and losers and seizing private property.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.