South City officially adopted its 2025-26 budget with a $12 million general fund deficit.
The city is facing about $152 million in spending, with only $140 million projected for revenue, Finance Director Karen Chang said during a City Council meeting June 25.
Numerous cities throughout the county are also facing deficits in light of rising costs and slow sales tax growth.
“We are not alone in the county. A lot of the cities within San Mateo County also face a deficit because there was the rising personnel costs — more than there was revenue growth — and persistent economic uncertainty,” Chang said.
Other cities, such as Belmont and San Mateo, have recently adopted their budgets with general fund deficit projections as well.
Many county jurisdictions, including South City, opted not to include another funding source in their budgets over its uncertainty. The complicated revenue stream is related to vehicle license fees paid by residents, which are directed to the state and then subsequently reimbursed to cities, typically by the following fiscal year. But the payback process is not straightforward, and given the state’s widening shortfall, uncertainty lingered over whether it would actually pay back cities.
Recommended for you
While it seems like cities like South San Francisco may receive the reimbursement this year, Chang said it will most likely receive only a portion of what it is owed.
“The state budget includes the funding for the property tax-in-lieu-of-VLF,” Chang said. “However, it appears that the city will only receive two-thirds, not 100%, of the shortfall, so for South San Francisco, that equates to approximately $3.3 million.”
If received, that would drop the deficit to about $8.7 million, Chang said.
To address a structural deficit, councilmembers contemplated several ballot measure options to go before voters in the 2026 election that could narrow the structural deficit during a council meeting June 11.
Councilmembers favored a parcel tax over most other options, such as a sales tax, with the fee structure not on assessed value but on land use and size. To attain the $14 million revenue goal for the ballot measure, staff estimated an average single-family residence could pay around $300 while a larger commercial space could pay up to $5,000 annually.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.