Several major transit agencies, including Caltrain and BART, are hopeful a 2026 transit ballot measure will help ease their ballooning deficits, and recent polling data shows modest support — but not enough to cross the necessary two-thirds majority threshold.
The first option presented to participants was a 10-year, half-cent sales tax that would initially prioritize the fiscal cliffs of major operators, like BART and Caltrain, generating $560 million each year. The second option is a 30-year, half-cent sales tax in addition to a parcel tax but may only comprise five counties, which would include San Mateo. A third option was an 11-year sales tax, anywhere from half cent to seven-eighths, generating $640 million annually.
Most support came from the first and third options, however, all would require significant investment to succeed, Ruth Bernstein, CEO of EMC Research, said.
“The [first option] and the variable rate does exceed a majority for each of those, but they do fall short of the two-thirds threshold, so as of right now it would be very challenging to see them reach two-thirds — possibly a citizens initiative that only needs 50% could be viable,” she said.
In San Mateo County, 59% of voters responded favorably to the first option – more so than the other presented alternatives. That was a slightly higher percentage than Contra Costa and even San Francisco counties.
Recommended for you
“I’m amazed at how well [the first scenario] polled with 59% support in San Mateo County. To me, there is a path forward to a regional solution, but the polling also showed that tax increases are not favorable right now and that getting that two-thirds support will take a great lift,” David Canepa, MTC commissioner and president of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, said. “But I do see an appetite for support for public transit so I think we’re definitely … moving in the right direction.”
The poll also showed that 23% of voters in San Mateo, San Francisco, Contra Costa and Alameda counties used public transportation daily or weekly. The poll also showed 36% used it rarely or never.
The measure will prove critical toward addressing Caltrain’s fiscal challenges, as it’s facing an average $75 million annual deficit for nearly a decade starting fiscal year 2027. State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, is also working to secure $2 billion in state funds to help close the financial gaps, however, the effort is still in the early stages.
Caltrain Government Affairs Director Jason Baker said a 2026 ballot measure is critical.
“We are working hard to cut costs and increase ridership and find other sources of nonfare revenue. Ridership is growing … but the truth is, we have a deficit we can’t cut our way out of,” Baker said. “This conversation is timely and critical for Caltrain and a number of other operators in the Bay Area.”
My previous comment on Jan 14 in the polling article…
I get the feeling this is another “loaded” poll where you can choose only one of several options – all of which propose increasing taxes. And of course, a headline will say folks voted for a tax increase (ignoring the fact that “no” tax increase wasn’t an option). Regardless, I’d urge folks to vote NO on continuing to fund ever increasing pensions and benefits. If there’s no fiscal management in the past and up to now, there will be none in the future.
And today we see, lo and behold, that it was a “loaded” poll. Take these results with a grain of salt because I believe the percentage in support is likely lower. But just in case, I continue to urge folks to vote NO on continuing to fund ever increasing pensions and benefits. If there’s no fiscal management in the past and up to now, there will be none in the future.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
My previous comment on Jan 14 in the polling article…
I get the feeling this is another “loaded” poll where you can choose only one of several options – all of which propose increasing taxes. And of course, a headline will say folks voted for a tax increase (ignoring the fact that “no” tax increase wasn’t an option). Regardless, I’d urge folks to vote NO on continuing to fund ever increasing pensions and benefits. If there’s no fiscal management in the past and up to now, there will be none in the future.
And today we see, lo and behold, that it was a “loaded” poll. Take these results with a grain of salt because I believe the percentage in support is likely lower. But just in case, I continue to urge folks to vote NO on continuing to fund ever increasing pensions and benefits. If there’s no fiscal management in the past and up to now, there will be none in the future.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.