Polling is underway for a regional transit measure, which would help close several of the major transit agencies’ funding gaps, including SamTrans and especially Caltrain.
Jessica Epstein, director of Community and Government Affairs at SamTrans, said the agency might conduct its own polling after it is completed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, though it would likely be focused on renewing Measure A, a county-specific half-cent sales tax. Previously, MTC Commissioner Gina Papan voiced concerns over polling questions, particularly on the Peninsula.
Earlier this month, MTC commissioners decided to move ahead with polling voters on several ballot measure options for the 2026 election.
One option is a 30-year, half-cent sales tax generating $540 million applying to San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa and San Mateo counties, though the other Bay Area counties could opt in. About 90% of the funds in the first eight years would go to the highest-need operators, like Caltrain and BART. The second option is also 30 years, but would generate $1.5 billion as it would cover all nine Bay Area counties and would be funded via payroll or parcel tax. Other potential measures could include a shorter, 10-year version of the first option or incorporating different types of taxes into whichever measure is favored.
As a bus operator, SamTrans stands to gain from a regional transit measure, but not nearly as much as Caltrain. While SamTrans officials recently warned that expenses are beginning to outpace revenue, the bus system still remains in a more fiscally sound position than the rail agency.
San Mateo County Supervisor Ray Mueller, a now-former SamTrans and Caltrain board member, said the county should boost its leverage by finding a way not to participate in the regional measure should the conditions end up unfavorable.
Recommended for you
“The best way to not become a donor county is to figure out on our own, what is the amount San Mateo County is short on for the contributions for the systems we use, and how can we collect that revenue independent of a regional measure — or cut costs?” he said. “That requires the boards to do the work now and be prepared to say to MTC, ‘we’ll take care of ourselves’ … if we don’t do that, we’re going to be beholden to whatever that ultimate regional measure is.”
Adina Levin, a San Mateo County resident, cautioned against pursuing multiple, and potentially, siloed efforts during the board meeting.
“Having a campaign that works together seems to me less risky than having four or five or six different campaigns happening at the same time, which may reduce the likelihood for voters,” Levin said.
Polling should be completed between January and February.
I get the feeling this is another “loaded” poll where you can choose only one of several options – all of which propose increasing taxes. And of course, a headline will say folks voted for a tax increase (ignoring the fact that “no” tax increase wasn’t an option). Regardless, I’d urge folks to vote NO on continuing to fund ever increasing pensions and benefits. If there’s no fiscal management in the past and up to now, there will be none in the future.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
I get the feeling this is another “loaded” poll where you can choose only one of several options – all of which propose increasing taxes. And of course, a headline will say folks voted for a tax increase (ignoring the fact that “no” tax increase wasn’t an option). Regardless, I’d urge folks to vote NO on continuing to fund ever increasing pensions and benefits. If there’s no fiscal management in the past and up to now, there will be none in the future.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.