When the Trump administration placed a 145% tariff on most Chinese importsApril 11, little changed for American consumers. In fact, many retailers had tariff sales. Three weeks later, we’re still in the eye of the storm. It’s a deceptive moment of calm before the real economic impact hits. In reality however, four significant shifts are already underway in our supply chains, and understanding these changes is important as it both gives context to what’s happening now as well as what’s looming in the coming weeks.
American retailers and manufacturers have been operating with historically high inventory levels since the pandemic. Following the 2021–2022 supply chain crisis, businesses maintained excess stock as a buffer against disruptions, which inadvertently protected consumers from price shocks. Major retailers like Walmart, Target and The Home Depot have spent the past year or more working down pandemic-era excesses, but many still have enough Chinese-made goods to continue normal operations for weeks to months.
This inventory buffer won’t last forever. Once warehouse stocks deplete and remain unreplenished, consumers will face the inevitable choice between higher prices, alternative products, or nothing.
Meanwhile, many large-scale importers started employing a quieter strategy: moving shipments to bonded warehouses. These special facilities allow goods to be stored without paying duties until they enter U.S. commerce. By frontloading shipments and placing them in bond, companies can strategically release products while negotiating with suppliers or waiting out policy changes. This has artificially extended pre-tariff economics, but only really benefits large companies with the resources to leverage complex customs procedures. Small business owners like my friend Elenor Mak, founder of Jilly Bing dolls, are scrambling to maintain quality and price without the same levers bigger players have.
At the same time, businesses are accelerating what trade experts call “tariff engineering.” Chinese manufacturers were quick to accelerate the shift of their final assembly operations to Vietnam, Malaysia and other border countries to evade origin requirements. In early 2025, Chinese companies accounted for 30% of the new investment projects in Vietnam. These strategic relocations enable products to undergo minimal processing while still qualifying as non-Chinese before being imported into the United States. While this creates jobs in Southeast Asia, it rarely brings manufacturing back home.
Perhaps the most telling signal is our ports. The Port of Los Angeles, the busiest container port in the country and the primary gateway for Asian imports, is beginning to see the arrival of vessels that sailed from China in mid-April. In the coming weeks, inbound vessel traffic from China is down 44% year-over-year, driven by a wave of canceled sailings from the announcement April 11. At the same time, empty export containers returning to Asia are up by 23%, indicating an unusually large imbalance in trade flows across the Pacific.
Recommended for you
For U.S. exporters like California’s agricultural producers who last year exported $1.24 billion in perishables to China, reduced port volume means higher costs, lower capacity and greater waste. Due to this drop in port volume, trucking activity out of the Port of Los Angeles is down 23% year over year. What happens to the domestic trucking and warehousing industries when more than 700,000 loads evaporate over just three weeks? We are about to find out.
Rather than broad tariffs that disrupt more than they solve, more surgical approaches could have been deployed at the onset. The de minimis rule, which allows shipments valued under $800 to enter duty-free, has in the post-internet e-commerce era become a massive loophole exploited by Chinese e-commerce giants like Alibaba, Temu, Shein and ByteDance. U.S.-based Wish benefited from this loophole as well, all the way to IPO in late-2020.
The Biden administration first proposed closing this loophole, which allows nearly 800 million packages annually to bypass normal import controls, but ran into resistance from lobbyists and political bottlenecks. The current administration announced April 2 it will end de minimis eligibility for China starting May 2 citing the opioid crisis, but this change on its own without blanket tariffs would have significantly improved domestic competitiveness in key categories without the far-reaching consequences now unfolding.
In the end, it is consumers, independent operators and small business owners who bear the heaviest burden of these economic policies. Higher prices, delayed goods and disappearing margins are very real outcomes of overly generic strategies with unintended consequences that are too easily brushed off by some.
While the short-term damage is already done, the long-term pain can still be contained to months instead of years. If the goal is truly to rebuild domestic manufacturing, then we must invest — not cut — at every level, from workforce redevelopment to infrastructure to energy. We are past the point where throwing more quantitative easing at the economy can inflate away real problems. It is time for our policymakers to focus on the problem, not the headlines.
Annie Tsai is chief operating officer at Interact (tryinteract.com), early stage investor and advisor with The House Fund (thehouse.fund), and a member of the San Mateo County Housing and Community Development Committee. Find Annie on Twitter @meannie.
Annie Tsai is chief operating officer at Interact (tryinteract.com), early stage investor and advisor with The House Fund (thehouse.fund), and a member of the San Mateo County Housing and Community Development Committee. Find Annie on Twitter @meannie.
I can't wait to see the junk, including marginal after-market car parts, coming from China to disappear from our inventories. Who needs the unending, throw-away clutter from my grandchildren's play areas? Who really needs the latest iPhone anyway? Those are just some examples. I was just reading about the initiative started in 1940 to ramp up our war industry to start producing planes, tanks, guns, etc. under the National Defense Advisory Committee's direction. Within months, the US industries were cranking out those products at record numbers. Providing that incentive to our manufacturing segment, we can do the same again. Most Americans, including yours truly, would not mind paying more for US made products. This is a national security and a self preservation issue. We have always been more ingenious and focused than most countries so we will survive and will be better for it.
Thanks for your column today, Ms. Tsai, highlighting what concerns you about recent Trump administration tariffs. From your take, it seems businesses were aware of potential tariffs and they took measures to minimize impacts. From polls and the election of Trump, folks are okay with Trump’s actions. Instead of focusing on what people think will happen and assuming tariffs at current levels will remain, let’s see what happens. If tariffs remain high for products from China, there are other choices from other countries. And businesses will adapt, as they always do.
TBot, can you share the polls you are talking about?
Fox News has him falling ... quote: "47% approve of Trump (48% disapprove), while a new low of 38% approve on the economy (56% disapprove). His worst ratings are on inflation (33% approve, 59% disapprove), followed by tariffs (33%-58%), foreign policy (40%-54%), taxes (38%-53%), and guns (41%-44%)."
His first-100-day approval ratings are officially 12 points lower than Biden, even 22 points lower than Obama or Bush at that early point of their administrations. Trump 2.0 approval ratings are even 3 points lower than Trump 1.0 - the previous (negative) record holder.
Basically only union bosses and teamsters from the 1920s like tariffs and there aren't too many around from that time anymore.
eGerd – TBot here. Our (yes, our) great President Trump has said he would, repeatedly, impose tariffs. Especially during his campaign stops and more notably at his inauguration and address to Congress speeches. Folks voted for Trump based on those campaign promises, among many others. From the last poll I saw, around 70% of folks believe Trump is doing what he campaigned on. I can’t recall the last time I saw that question asked/answered on a poll. (Likely because the results won’t advance a Democrat narrative.) As for your Fox statistics and other polls, I’d like to see the political affiliation of those who took the poll. As we know, recent polls from the NYT and ABC/Amazon Post polled many more non-Trump supporters vs. the general public – even though Trump won 50% of all votes. Biased polls, anyone?
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
I can't wait to see the junk, including marginal after-market car parts, coming from China to disappear from our inventories. Who needs the unending, throw-away clutter from my grandchildren's play areas? Who really needs the latest iPhone anyway? Those are just some examples. I was just reading about the initiative started in 1940 to ramp up our war industry to start producing planes, tanks, guns, etc. under the National Defense Advisory Committee's direction. Within months, the US industries were cranking out those products at record numbers. Providing that incentive to our manufacturing segment, we can do the same again. Most Americans, including yours truly, would not mind paying more for US made products. This is a national security and a self preservation issue. We have always been more ingenious and focused than most countries so we will survive and will be better for it.
Thanks for your column today, Ms. Tsai, highlighting what concerns you about recent Trump administration tariffs. From your take, it seems businesses were aware of potential tariffs and they took measures to minimize impacts. From polls and the election of Trump, folks are okay with Trump’s actions. Instead of focusing on what people think will happen and assuming tariffs at current levels will remain, let’s see what happens. If tariffs remain high for products from China, there are other choices from other countries. And businesses will adapt, as they always do.
TBot, can you share the polls you are talking about?
Fox News has him falling ... quote: "47% approve of Trump (48% disapprove), while a new low of 38% approve on the economy (56% disapprove). His worst ratings are on inflation (33% approve, 59% disapprove), followed by tariffs (33%-58%), foreign policy (40%-54%), taxes (38%-53%), and guns (41%-44%)."
His first-100-day approval ratings are officially 12 points lower than Biden, even 22 points lower than Obama or Bush at that early point of their administrations. Trump 2.0 approval ratings are even 3 points lower than Trump 1.0 - the previous (negative) record holder.
Basically only union bosses and teamsters from the 1920s like tariffs and there aren't too many around from that time anymore.
eGerd – TBot here. Our (yes, our) great President Trump has said he would, repeatedly, impose tariffs. Especially during his campaign stops and more notably at his inauguration and address to Congress speeches. Folks voted for Trump based on those campaign promises, among many others. From the last poll I saw, around 70% of folks believe Trump is doing what he campaigned on. I can’t recall the last time I saw that question asked/answered on a poll. (Likely because the results won’t advance a Democrat narrative.) As for your Fox statistics and other polls, I’d like to see the political affiliation of those who took the poll. As we know, recent polls from the NYT and ABC/Amazon Post polled many more non-Trump supporters vs. the general public – even though Trump won 50% of all votes. Biased polls, anyone?
The political affiliation of Fox News seems pretty clear. They are not making any secrets about who and what they like.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.