A resolution urging social media platforms to enforce established community standards that prevent and eliminate content regarding guns, violence, racism and hate was passed with one abstention by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors.
The resolution directly mentioned Meta, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok. Supervisor David Canepa presented the resolution to the board and said social media has a direct impact on the county’s residents and therefore deserves the board’s attention.
“When we talk about social media, we’re not merely discussing virtual interactions,” Canepa said. “We’re talking about the very real impact it has on communities. Content that spreads like wildfire across these platforms doesn’t just stay online, it manifests in our neighborhoods, our schools and our streets.”
Karen North, the founder and former director of USC Annenberg’s Digital Social Media Program, provided a presentation to the board about the impact social media has on a person’s gauge for what is appropriate.
Social media teaches us what is appropriate and admirable compared to what is unacceptable, she said. When thinking about violence, she added the depictions online are often callous or are glorified, suggesting a casualness of something ultimately harmful.
“What’s so upsetting is that when violence is real, we find ourselves consuming real life tragedy as entertainment,” North said. “On social media, we lose perspective as a number of social cues are absent.”
Supervisor Noelia Corzo, who abstained from voting, questioned if suggesting further enforcement of community guidelines, ultimately established by the social media companies, could have unintended consequences such as an increase in censorship.
Juan Ruiz, a student who focuses on the intersections of public health and consequences of censorship, shared during public comment they have experience with social media platforms censoring marginalized voices while simultaneously failing to censor actual hate on their platforms.
“As a student who engages in social justice within public health, there are many times where messages that are calling for liberation or true justice are subjected to that same censorship by these companies, especially when it comes to Black and brown voices,” Ruiz said.
North addressed the concern for censorship by clarifying that any enforcement of community guidelines cannot be considered censorship as social media is a private space, and therefore are not subject to principles such as the First Amendment.
Recommended for you
“It’s up to the owners of these private businesses to create standards,” North said. “It’s worthwhile having them make thoughtful decisions about what kind of harm is being perpetrated alongside of the good and alongside of the fun.”
Canepa said it was important to delineate the resolution from censorship of speech, as it particularly addresses violence and that of similar nature.
The exact wording of the resolution says to prevent or eliminate “content promoting guns, violence, racism, hate or any content that violates the community standards and guidelines.”
Supervisor Ray Mueller said he had initial concern over this resolution when considering how much time Congress spends discussing these matters and understanding the difference in that Congress has oversight and legislative authority over these companies, while the county does not.
“Though we have testimony from a very accomplished witness, we really haven’t had a chance to consider evidence the way that an entity would that was going to act in such a manner,” Mueller said.
However, he said that because he has paid attention to congressional hearings on similar matters, he is more comfortable moving forward in support of the resolution. He clarified to his colleagues that typically he would be hesitant to do so without the proper knowledge.
Corzo said she needed more information to make an informed decision.
“I’m just not comfortable or confident that this is the best way to move forward, especially when I don’t have enough information on what the standards are that we are asking these companies to enforce,” Corzo said. “Like Supervisor Mueller stated, there are these conversations happening at the congressional level and those hearings take hours and hours and hours, and I just don’t feel comfortable with the little information we have right now.”
The resolution ultimately passed 4-0 with one abstention. The clerk of the board is now directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to the top social media platform companies currently in operation.
"The exact wording of the resolution says to prevent or eliminate “content promoting guns, violence, racism, hate or any content that violates the community standards and guidelines.”
1984 for sure. This is so broad. Some people might think abortion should be on the list.
Canepa, haven't you along with FB, Twitter, Google etc.. censored enough of American's freedoms? This is backdoor way of again censoring those people who don't toe the gestapo line. I.E. conservatives, Republicans, Christians.
Well said, Not So Common. Let’s not forget others who don’t toe the gestapo line. Pro-life folks, folks who don’t buy into the man-made global warming narrative, folks who believe biological men shouldn’t compete against women, folks who believe in enforcing borders, enforcing law and order, folks who believe in voter ID, etc.
Imagine Noelia Corzo being the voice of (slight) reason and common sense. San Mateo BOS shouldn't be wasting time on these kinds of non-binding virtue signaling resolutions. And of course we've all seen where overzealous "community standards" and "fact checking" leads on social media - censorship of dissident voices, often encouraged and promoted by the government (See Missouri v. Biden case.) Luckily we have a believer in free speech in Elon Musk, who doesn't care what David Canepa thinks.
Let's give credit where credit is due. Thank you Supervisor Corzo, you show more wisdom than even Mueller. Tell Canepa to deal with issues that we can control within the County's sphere of influence.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
"The exact wording of the resolution says to prevent or eliminate “content promoting guns, violence, racism, hate or any content that violates the community standards and guidelines.”
1984 for sure. This is so broad. Some people might think abortion should be on the list.
Canepa, haven't you along with FB, Twitter, Google etc.. censored enough of American's freedoms? This is backdoor way of again censoring those people who don't toe the gestapo line. I.E. conservatives, Republicans, Christians.
Well said, Not So Common. Let’s not forget others who don’t toe the gestapo line. Pro-life folks, folks who don’t buy into the man-made global warming narrative, folks who believe biological men shouldn’t compete against women, folks who believe in enforcing borders, enforcing law and order, folks who believe in voter ID, etc.
Imagine Noelia Corzo being the voice of (slight) reason and common sense. San Mateo BOS shouldn't be wasting time on these kinds of non-binding virtue signaling resolutions. And of course we've all seen where overzealous "community standards" and "fact checking" leads on social media - censorship of dissident voices, often encouraged and promoted by the government (See Missouri v. Biden case.) Luckily we have a believer in free speech in Elon Musk, who doesn't care what David Canepa thinks.
Let's give credit where credit is due. Thank you Supervisor Corzo, you show more wisdom than even Mueller. Tell Canepa to deal with issues that we can control within the County's sphere of influence.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.