Following a bicycle fatality on a notoriously dangerous overpass in San Carlos, city staff led a listening session for residents and bike safety advocates to propose near-term solutions to mitigate heightened concerns. 

The death of Andrea Vallebueno, 31, on Nov. 16, 2024, reignited conversations about the dangerous Holly Street/Highway 101 overpass and the long-demanded infrastructure updates for cyclists and pedestrian safety. 

Recommended for you

ana@smdailyjournal.com

(65) 344-5200 ext. 106

Recommended for you

(9) comments

joebob91

Thank you for the wonderful coverage of this important issue, SMDJ. When people die because of unsafe streets, it deserves similar coverage to that of murders, fires, and other tragedies. Street violence is preventable if we design our streets for safety, not speed. We should hold our electeds accountable when they make decisions that cost lives.

K Dubs

Thanks for this story, much appreciated. The bicycle/pedestrian overpass project has been in development for well over a decade. The biggest obstacle was in 2019 when the project went to bid and the lowest contractor bid was 30% higher than the estimate. Unfortunately instead of taking action then, the can has been kicked down the road and costs continue to grow. Worth noting that recently new ped/bike overpasses have opened in Belmont (2011) and Palo Alto (2021), and a new 101 underpass just opened in Redwood City. How are these other cities able to get projects completed and San Carlos is still in the discussion phase?

Looking forward to continuing coverage. So tragic that another fatality is the impetus to do what should have been done years ago. Condolences to family, friends, and loved ones.

easygerd

All the talk about the budget and money is very flawed of course.

C/CAG, MTC, JPL, Caltrans and whoever else was in charge of widening the highway MUST also be put in charge of providing the funding to cross these wider highways - that has to be a minimum ADA requirement. So this is on David Canepa, Diane Papan, Gina Papan, Alicia Aguirre, Rico E. Medina, Emily Beach, Davina Hurt, and the other county "leaders" that have given us the 101 highway expansion without the necessary ADA relevant infrastructure to go along with it.

K Dubs

No doubt it’s a multiagency issue, but the RFP for the actual construction was issued by the city of San Carlos. It’s the city that has not come up with the funds, although to be fair they have been applying (unsuccessfully) for grants. SMTCA has already provided millions to support prep work. As above, other peninsula towns have figured out how to get these projects done, San Carlos needs to do the same. Help from any other agency is always welcome.

easygerd

- Why do cities have to come up with funds to repair a problem created by the county?

- why are upgrades to ADA-curbs regarded "pedestrian projects", when sidewalks only exist to protect us from cars?

- why do residents pay for sidewalks when the problem is created by the city providing free streets?

- why are crosswalks, traffic lights often paid out of pedestrian budgets, when they benefit drivers the most?

- why is "traffic calming", "Slow Streets", "Bicycle Boulevards" and similar nonsense paid of Active Transportation funds, when they do nothing for people on bicycles?

Who pays for what are simple accounting tricks. This makes sure nothing gets done for pedestrians and cyclists.

The law should be, if the county builds public car infrastructure, they need to pay for the required ADA parts of the project - and ADA relevant means pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. That must be a part of the Environmental Impact Report and no project should be approved without it.

joebob91

San Mateo's bike/ped bridge on Hillsdale was also scrapped due to the 101 widening. Belmont and PA did not have to fight Caltrans to make their bridges happen.

K Dubs

Yes the Hillsdale road bridge also stalled out, and unfortunately they have experienced similar outcomes: https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/bicyclist-killed-on-hillsdale-overpass/article_5790192d-ea36-536c-a900-98408e999d6a.html

I am certainly not trying to defend Caltrans, just noting in the current system the cities are responsible for coordinating and funding these projects. Failure to move forward can have tragic consequences.

easygerd

thanks for the article about a Caltrans vehicle running over a cyclists - which is sort of providing the necessary symbolism here.

There is absolutely no law preventing Caltrans from building pedestrian bridges over their highways. In fact there are several laws and internal policies for Caltrans to provide "Complete Streets" since 2006 and Governor Schwarzenegger signed the first of these laws.

We also have SMCTA and C/CAG - two county organizations in charge of distributing the money. Both organizations are full of county law- and policy makers, who are in charge of ALL residents - even those on foot or bicycles (only few people actually seem to know that).

San Carlos certainly has to be at the table to make architectural decisions and where and how the bridge can best be installed, but the money clearly has to come from C/CAG and SMCTA as a Holly Bridge street would benefit Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City, Redwood Shores, and several county services like the county airport or the homeless shelter in the old Marriott hotel, etc. It's not a San Carlos projects - it's a county wide project. SMCTA, C/CAG and Caltrans are clearly in charge here to provide money. Emily Beach and Alicia Aguirre messed that one up.

K Dubs

Yes, i did think about pointing out the irony. I think there is agreement here - the entities responsible for the roads and their dangerous overpasses should be accountable and responsible for making ped/bike transit across those roads safe. I hope that happens in San Carlos.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here