Making $109,700 in San Mateo County is now considered low income, according to the California Department of Housing. Angela (all first names in this piece are altered), 52, doesn’t make nearly that much with her part-time job as a grocery store cashier. Becky, 50, showers and gets dressed at 9 p.m. and takes a bus to the airport for her job in cargo services. She also doesn’t make anywhere near six figures. Caroline, 62, gets up at 4 a.m. to get ready for her job for Uber Eats. She has a car but can’t afford rent to live here.

Jackie Speier

Jackie Speier

Angela, Becky and Caroline are homeless and stay at Safe Harbor shelter near the airport. I met them when I spent a night there on April 29.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(8) comments

shawnfahrenbruch

Any recommendations for how I might volunteer to help 1 day a month or even a couple hours per month for homeless people? Who would I contact?

easygerd

"Functional Zero" and "Vision Zero" - as the names would suggest - are closely related. In San Mateo County they are also practiced the same way: with zero ambition and zero results.

It's mostly about Virtue Signaling with our Board of Supervisors - not with real results.

As usual there is a simple litmus test anyone can use to check with their own eyes, if their favorite politician supports these two projects:

Affordable housing requires affordable transportation, which means ...

A) solid sidewalks: cities like Denver are taking on the responsibility of providing and maintaining sidewalks. In our cities they are the responsibility of homeowners and quality is badly enforced. The unincorporated County (aka Jackie Speier) mostly doesn't even have them.

B) solid bike lane networks: Jackie was on the Board in the 1980s and returned just recently. In between San Mateo has basically done patchwork duty. There is not one real North-South connector bikeway and there is also no real East-West connector. In fact it is even hard to get over Caltrain or 101 in many places. If your politician doesn't support bike lanes, they are just pretenders. (Yes, I'm looking at you Nicole, Danielle, Lisa, Rob, Adam).

C) a solid bus network with bus lanes: SamTrans is 95% funded by sales tax and gets millions in funding, but that Board (Canepa, Medina, Gee, Mueller and now Jackie Speier) have constantly invested in all kinds of things except customer experience and reliability of service. Currently they are spending $2M on another study about the "Grand Boulevard Initiative" - something that was finished in 2013 already. Something that is far outside their jurisdiction.

San Mateo Democrats are just messing with us. This is virtue signaling.

Terence Y

Thanks for your guest perspective, Ms. Speier, but IMO your guest “experience” appears to be another episode of performative politics that doesn’t move the needle. Sure, you’ll receive publicity but will it make any difference? We already know folks obtaining services from shelters have issues with finding housing. We already know housing prices are high and may soon be followed by increasing rental costs, as another article written today suggests. We already know one of the main if not the most pressing issue is in building affordable housing.

When locales add higher permit costs and tack on more/higher property tax fees and assessments, developers would rather build commercial buildings rather than housing. Do you think unsubsidized housing can be built so anybody making $110,000 can make the numbers work out? I’d recommend that instead of another “experience” to tell us what we already know, perhaps you can use your influence to instead lower the costs of building housing. Along with lowering permit costs and property tax fees and assessments. Or, for another experience, perhaps you and others with the same mindset could begin hosting many of the folks needing shelter. I know I’d like to hear about that experience as that would be making a difference. And as an added benefit, perhaps by setting an example, others may follow.

JustMike650

@ Terence Y - you continue to be unable to help yourself leave a decent - neutral or positive reply - choosing instead to lead with the 'but' reflection ...

Thanks for your guest perspective, Ms. Speier, but ...

I feel sorry for your continued same-same response - regardless of the authors content, authenticity or acumen ...

Terence Y

Thanks for your feedback, JustMike650, but it’s ironic you complain I don’t leave a decent – neutral or positive reply and yet you don’t leave a decent – neutral or positive response. Do what you say and not what you do? Here’s another chance for you to use this as a teachable moment - rewrite my comment to reflect my sentiments in what you would consider a decent – neutral or positive reply. Show me the way. Or will I receive the same-same response of…no response as before?

Perhaps instead of a lecture you could give us your thoughts on Ms. Speier’s performance and your bold ideas to address our homeless crisis. We know there are more homeless people in California after Newsom blew over $20 billion on the homeless problem. We also know the homeless industrial complex is only too happy to take taxpayer money with no financial incentive to solve the homeless problem. Is that what’s being replicated here in San Mateo County with shelters that have more open beds than homeless takers? In the absence of data, some would say yes.

Terence Y

Hey JustMike650. I’m still waiting for your thoughts on Ms. Speier’s performance and your bold ideas to address our homeless crisis. And of course, I’m still waiting on that teachable moment, again, but I won’t hold my breath.

Cambodia2

Glad Jackie got to experience Samaritan House's Safe Harbor Shelter. It's a lesson in what life can throw at you for sure! For decades this shelter had a story to tell that people don't realize: most shelter residents are WORKING, just too poor to afford our local exorbitant rental market. The rest are the formerly working elderly now priced out by their meager fixed incomes, or folks with medical or mental health issues that make working and housing quite a challenge. The percentage of elderly has been growing shockingly. Samaritan House does an excellent job in much of the ladder of services to keep people housed or to get them back into housing, but right now there simply isn't enough affordable housing altogether. Nor are there enough supportive services to keep them housed once there. It's a convenient myth that people want to live on our streets, folks. Let's give them a chance and a leg up.

JustMike650

Great and decent post !

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here