Making $109,700 in San Mateo County is now considered low income, according to the California Department of Housing. Angela (all first names in this piece are altered), 52, doesn’t make nearly that much with her part-time job as a grocery store cashier. Becky, 50, showers and gets dressed at 9 p.m. and takes a bus to the airport for her job in cargo services. She also doesn’t make anywhere near six figures. Caroline, 62, gets up at 4 a.m. to get ready for her job for Uber Eats. She has a car but can’t afford rent to live here.
Angela, Becky and Caroline are homeless and stay at Safe Harbor shelter near the airport. I met them when I spent a night there on April 29.
I slept in a bunk bed like all other residents. Twelve beds were empty that night, so I wasn’t taking one away from someone in need. I had done the same in 2014 at the Maple Street shelter — inspired by Pope Francis, who was rumored to don civilian clothes and spend time with the homeless in Rome. I thought to myself, if the pope can do it, I can do it.
Now — 11 years later, with homelessness in the U.S. at record highs — I wanted to see what had changed. Angela, Becky and Caroline were not unusual for the shelter. They were older, reflecting a UCSF study that found that almost half of all homeless people in the U.S. became homeless in middle age. They were also working for wages utterly insufficient to afford a place to live in San Mateo County — one of the most expensive counties in the country. From my 14 conversations that night, I estimated that 40% of the people staying at Safe Harbor had jobs — some more than one job.
As of 2024, San Mateo County counted 1,145 unsheltered homeless individuals and 985 in our shelters. We currently have six shelters. The county’s goal is to reach “functional zero” — where any homeless individual seeking shelter will have a spot.
Many of the people I spoke to at Safe Harbor have been in the system for years. They move from shelter to shelter — sometimes with a few days on buses in between. Eric, 66, moved from the Navigation Center — the county’s largest homeless shelter — to Safe Harbor and is nearing his exit date. He was working in construction but then had two heart attacks. He told me he simply can’t afford a place to rent.
Medical emergencies, mental illness, accidents, addiction or relationship issues often contribute to the circumstances sending people into shelters. Caroline had breast cancer and has a heart condition. She used to be a caregiver but had a falling out with her employer. Becky used to live and work in Chicago until her son was shot and killed. She had a difficult time coping and came back to the Bay Area where she has family.
Having family nearby is also not unusual for shelter residents. Angela lived a middle-class life until a bad divorce upended it. She’s been homeless for 10 years. Her mother lives in the area, but Angela says she “can’t live with her.” Frankie, a woman in her 30s, also has parents in the area but they are estranged. Frankie told me that she struggled with drug addiction but is now sober, and her three children remain in foster care.
I believe that many of the people I talked to could be restored to stable lives, but we need to improve our system to help them. As one male resident put it succinctly, “I can function, but I can’t function by myself.”
Samaritan House — which runs Safe Harbor — recently started to bring mental health services into their shelters. Laura Bent, CEO of Samaritan House, says that mental health needs are higher than ever because the cases are so complex, but federal and state funding are shrinking. “From a mental health perspective, there aren’t enough services available to meet the needs of the folks we are serving these days. That’s true of all the shelters,” she says. She points out that those services also need to be extended into permanent and supportive housing.
Secondly, we need to bring job training into the shelters. Angela, Becky and Caroline are so busy working their low-paying jobs, they don’t have the time and energy to plan an alternative path that could lead them to better jobs and self-sufficiency.
And thirdly, let’s explore ways to bridge family rifts. Is there a role the county could play in reconnecting family members and facilitating better living situations?
It was humbling and eye-opening to meet the people who are living in our shelters. Let’s listen to their stories and come up with bold ideas to address our homeless crisis. In the richest county in California — where innovation is in our DNA — surely we can do this!
Jackie Speier represents District 1 on the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. Jackie has represented the residents of the San Mateo County for over 40 years on all levels of government, starting on the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors in 1981, followed by her service in the California Assembly and Senate for 18 years, and in the U.S. Congress for almost 15 years.
(8) comments
Any recommendations for how I might volunteer to help 1 day a month or even a couple hours per month for homeless people? Who would I contact?
"Functional Zero" and "Vision Zero" - as the names would suggest - are closely related. In San Mateo County they are also practiced the same way: with zero ambition and zero results.
It's mostly about Virtue Signaling with our Board of Supervisors - not with real results.
As usual there is a simple litmus test anyone can use to check with their own eyes, if their favorite politician supports these two projects:
Affordable housing requires affordable transportation, which means ...
A) solid sidewalks: cities like Denver are taking on the responsibility of providing and maintaining sidewalks. In our cities they are the responsibility of homeowners and quality is badly enforced. The unincorporated County (aka Jackie Speier) mostly doesn't even have them.
B) solid bike lane networks: Jackie was on the Board in the 1980s and returned just recently. In between San Mateo has basically done patchwork duty. There is not one real North-South connector bikeway and there is also no real East-West connector. In fact it is even hard to get over Caltrain or 101 in many places. If your politician doesn't support bike lanes, they are just pretenders. (Yes, I'm looking at you Nicole, Danielle, Lisa, Rob, Adam).
C) a solid bus network with bus lanes: SamTrans is 95% funded by sales tax and gets millions in funding, but that Board (Canepa, Medina, Gee, Mueller and now Jackie Speier) have constantly invested in all kinds of things except customer experience and reliability of service. Currently they are spending $2M on another study about the "Grand Boulevard Initiative" - something that was finished in 2013 already. Something that is far outside their jurisdiction.
San Mateo Democrats are just messing with us. This is virtue signaling.
Thanks for your guest perspective, Ms. Speier, but IMO your guest “experience” appears to be another episode of performative politics that doesn’t move the needle. Sure, you’ll receive publicity but will it make any difference? We already know folks obtaining services from shelters have issues with finding housing. We already know housing prices are high and may soon be followed by increasing rental costs, as another article written today suggests. We already know one of the main if not the most pressing issue is in building affordable housing.
When locales add higher permit costs and tack on more/higher property tax fees and assessments, developers would rather build commercial buildings rather than housing. Do you think unsubsidized housing can be built so anybody making $110,000 can make the numbers work out? I’d recommend that instead of another “experience” to tell us what we already know, perhaps you can use your influence to instead lower the costs of building housing. Along with lowering permit costs and property tax fees and assessments. Or, for another experience, perhaps you and others with the same mindset could begin hosting many of the folks needing shelter. I know I’d like to hear about that experience as that would be making a difference. And as an added benefit, perhaps by setting an example, others may follow.
@ Terence Y - you continue to be unable to help yourself leave a decent - neutral or positive reply - choosing instead to lead with the 'but' reflection ...
Thanks for your guest perspective, Ms. Speier, but ...
I feel sorry for your continued same-same response - regardless of the authors content, authenticity or acumen ...
Thanks for your feedback, JustMike650, but it’s ironic you complain I don’t leave a decent – neutral or positive reply and yet you don’t leave a decent – neutral or positive response. Do what you say and not what you do? Here’s another chance for you to use this as a teachable moment - rewrite my comment to reflect my sentiments in what you would consider a decent – neutral or positive reply. Show me the way. Or will I receive the same-same response of…no response as before?
Perhaps instead of a lecture you could give us your thoughts on Ms. Speier’s performance and your bold ideas to address our homeless crisis. We know there are more homeless people in California after Newsom blew over $20 billion on the homeless problem. We also know the homeless industrial complex is only too happy to take taxpayer money with no financial incentive to solve the homeless problem. Is that what’s being replicated here in San Mateo County with shelters that have more open beds than homeless takers? In the absence of data, some would say yes.
Hey JustMike650. I’m still waiting for your thoughts on Ms. Speier’s performance and your bold ideas to address our homeless crisis. And of course, I’m still waiting on that teachable moment, again, but I won’t hold my breath.
Glad Jackie got to experience Samaritan House's Safe Harbor Shelter. It's a lesson in what life can throw at you for sure! For decades this shelter had a story to tell that people don't realize: most shelter residents are WORKING, just too poor to afford our local exorbitant rental market. The rest are the formerly working elderly now priced out by their meager fixed incomes, or folks with medical or mental health issues that make working and housing quite a challenge. The percentage of elderly has been growing shockingly. Samaritan House does an excellent job in much of the ladder of services to keep people housed or to get them back into housing, but right now there simply isn't enough affordable housing altogether. Nor are there enough supportive services to keep them housed once there. It's a convenient myth that people want to live on our streets, folks. Let's give them a chance and a leg up.
Great and decent post !
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.