Belmont’s 2023 proposed budget shows a surplus and the city on sound financial footing, although financial pandemic recovery and dips in tax revenue remain long-term concerns.
Tom McCune
Reporter
Belmont’s 2023 proposed budget shows a surplus and the city on sound financial footing, although financial pandemic recovery and dips in tax revenue remain long-term concerns.
“Our city has done really well in helping us stay afloat despite the pandemic and some of the other things,” Mayor Julia Mates said.
Tom McCune
Belmont’s total citywide budget is $87.5 million. Revenue is $91.2 million, resulting in a surplus of around $3.7 million. However, the long-term forecast shows a $4.3 million reduction over the next five years. Budget expenditures are $68.2 million, up 5.4% from last year. Around $56 million is for the city’s operating budget, with $12.3 million for the Belmont Fire Protection District. Capital improvement projects funding added $19.3 million.
Worker salaries and benefits make up more than half of the city expenditures, which is typical. Property tax makes up 37% of city revenue, with sales tax at 13%. Revenue from transient occupancy taxes is slowly increasing but will not hit pre-pandemic levels until 2025 or 2026. The Belmont Police Department’s budget in 2023 is $14.8 million, Parks and Recreation at $9.1 million, Community Development at $4.7 million, and Public Works at $11.3 million.
However, a staff report said the city faces challenges due to pandemic recovery and underfunded tax revenue from the state. Belmont said California is currently underfunding property tax in-lieu of vehicle license fees. A recent state budget estimate is using Educational Revenue Augmentation Funding to backfill the VLF shortfall. ERAF is excess local property taxes returned by the state after local school districts are fully funded to mandated levels. A staff report said the ERAF funds are already owed to cities like Belmont and are instead being used to pay a separate state obligation. The council declared it a long-term concern and a significant threat to monitor.
“It’s a shell game not of our making. It’s a shell game created by the state,” Vice Mayor Tom McCune said.
Councilmember Charles Stone said it could result in having to lay off city staff.
“I am incredibly concerned by the state’s attempt to engage in a shell game with the ERAF money,” Stone said. “The impact would be devastating to Belmont.”
Belmont Finance Director Grace Castaneda said the general fund projections show falling revenue over the next 10 years. The city will likely need to dip into reserves because Belmont only has a few revenue sources. Belmont officials have spent the last year looking at expanding its revenue sources base.
“As those revenue sources take a hit, take time to recover, and lose growth potential, our total revenue is not catching up to our expenditures,” Castaneda said.
Budget priorities in 2023 are hiring and unfreezing funding for city workers, developing diversity and equity programs, and funding for street improvements. The city is also focusing on more funding for public safety communication equipment and the city’s Crisis Assessment, Response and Education program, or CARE. The program has officers with mental health training respond to calls involving mental health crises. A community survey found residents want street repairs, improved 911 response times and park improvements. Councilmember Warren Lieberman thanked city staff for identifying long-term issues and being proactive, noting there were times in the past when that was not the case. He declared the budget process clearer and better over the years.
“This city has been incredibly well served by the finance department in combination with all our departments in terms of just how well this has all been managed,” Lieberman said.
A budget adoption meeting date is scheduled for June 14. It will also vote on a resolution to increase taxes on new developments to offset increased development costs by creating a Community Facilities District. This tool helps generate locally-controlled revenue to support essential city services to new developments like police, fire, libraries and schools. Under the proposed structure, new developments would pay taxes to mitigate new city services.
(650) 344-5200 ext. 102
(650) 344-5200 ext. 102
Reporter
{{description}}
Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
“A dazzling delight for all ages” Read moreRodger's & Hammerstein's Cinderella
Come as you are to a peaceful, family-friendly service of carols, candles, and the story of … Read moreChristmas Eve Candlelight Service
Join San Mateo County native and real estate expert Paisley Vartanian for the first-ever in-… Read moreNational Homeowners Day
Navigating Senior Care, Estate Planning, & Funeral Planning Read morePeace of Mind with a Piece of Cake
Dirk van Ulden said:
Dirk van Ulden said:
Thomas Morgan said:
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
I sent three emails to the Belmont City Council for their budget meeting and not one of the council members responded to me by email or discussed my concerns in the meeting. In fact, City Clerk Jozi Plut first stated there were no public comments on this topic, until reminded by others that comments had been submitted. However, she did not identify the senders or topics of the emails.
The main focus of my emails was that budget forecasts were overly pessimistic and city staff was wrong to say that new taxes were needed. In the first email, I questioned the accuracy of the budget forecasts because the general fund balance was forecast to be 80% higher next year than expected one year ago, and forecast to be 163% higher in fiscal year 2026 than expected one year ago. I asked how the forecasts could have changed so much in one year. In the second email, I documented that there would be no decreases in the general fund balance over the next ten years if not for increasing transfers from the general fund to other funds. My third email complained that the budgets this year and last year were much less user friendly than in prior years because much of the financial details were omitted.
The concerns in my emails were all well-documented and central to the budget discussion, but were completely ignored by the council members and city clerk. This is part of a long history where this Council has ignored and suppressed differing viewpoints, no matter how well-reasoned the arguments. Belmont residents deserve better than this, and county residents deserve better than Charles Stone as supervisor.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.