Editor,
Legislators have found a perfect way to convince the voting public to accept just about anything: turn any event into a crisis and nobody questions either the label of “crisis” or the solutions legislators offer to solve the crisis.
Rain and wind. Potential for heavy rainfall. Low 53F. Winds S at 25 to 35 mph. Chance of rain 100%. Rainfall around a quarter of an inch..
Rain and wind. Potential for heavy rainfall. Low 53F. Winds S at 25 to 35 mph. Chance of rain 100%. Rainfall around a quarter of an inch.
Updated: December 24, 2025 @ 8:55 pm
Editor,
Legislators have found a perfect way to convince the voting public to accept just about anything: turn any event into a crisis and nobody questions either the label of “crisis” or the solutions legislators offer to solve the crisis.
The cost of housing in the Bay Area is a case in point, as are state Sen. Scott Wiener’s solutions, the latest of which is Senate Bill 827. How did housing become so expensive all of a sudden? Is it because residents of cities and counties wanted their communities to look as they wished them to look, or because state legislators decided to pass Senate Bill 375, Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, thereby starting an inexorable march toward creating vast areas of no-build zones and tight corridors of population density. This was done partly because we all want to breathe clean air and because of federal mandates requiring regional “sustainability.” But mostly it was done because state legislators saw an opportunity to amass power over cities and counties, get on the good side of developers and other big businesses, and establish new sources of political support.
We residents and voters are dealing with a very harsh set of circumstances that require clear thinking of alternatives, not despair over yet another crisis. Let’s form alliances with our neighbors and our neighborhood groups, study what is really happening and let’s not be afraid to offer our own solutions.
Marcy Berry
San Francisco
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
Make no mistake about it. Sen. Wiener is slowly removing the local control of zoning and development from the cities to the state. This in turn rendering General Plans created by the cities and their citizens useless! Just look at his financial supporters in his senate run and the bills he has passed already. He along with YIMBY, who is now the legal arm for their developers is slowly eroding the democratic and local process for controlling development. So now the developers and state will determine what is built in your city. How fun is that?
Am dumbfounded that Sen. Wiener makes no attempt to address the unbridled growth in office space. He only appears interested in addressing the supply side of housing and not the demand side where many of us would prefer to see more focus.
How about we start with getting government out of housing. Calling this situation a crisis is the first mistake. The market cycles of demand and supply should not be considered a crisis or something that needs to be fixed by artificial means.
People, we are not having a crisis, we just have a phenomenon where everyone in the world seems to want to live here. When government realizes it is part of the problem and gets itself out of the way, people struggling to find housing might get some relief. Inconveniencing people who have lived here for decades by forcing them to pay for someone else's affordable housing or stacking housing on top on each other and creating gridlock is not the answers long time residents want to hear, nor is it their problem to solve. So dump the word crisis and realize that not everyone who wants to live here can. The best way to determine that is the private market and not government intervention. Only in this area can a red hot real estate market be considered a crisis.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.