Mr. Grocott’s Oct. 25 column about signs was interesting but I am curious if this was his first road trip this century? The signs he referenced posted by (assumed) landowners and farmers on the I-5 corridor have been there for years. The only thing that changes is the governor’s name on the sign.
The greater question asked by my wife, Cydney, is why do these for-profit businesses insist on handouts when the Central Valley has a hot Mediterranean climate in the north and the southern parts of the region are dry and categorized as desert. And these businesses have effectively drained the aquifer of natural water while they insist on growing high-profit almond trees? (hmmm).
While I enjoy gardening and managing the San Bruno Community Garden, we focus our local efforts on water conservation and ban crops demanding high water (rice, taro, almond trees). We have driven the I-5 at least 40 times in the last 10 years with three of our four children living/studying in Los Angeles and so many times been shocked by the midday water spraying from sprinklers when temperatures exceed 90+ when drip systems running at dawn are a thousand times more efficient.
Mr Grocott suggested more dams as a solution, maybe, but how about right crops, right place, a basic concept of growing anything that any gardener or farmer should accept?
Mr. Sinks, I believe you hit upon the reason for growing almond trees – they’re high profit. If a crop isn’t profitable, I’m sore no farmer would bother growing it. As for water, as soon as the state does its fair share and shares the 50% of water flowing out to sea, we’d all be better off and perhaps those signs would disappear.
I grew up in the Central Valley but now live in the Bay Area. I made that same trip almost monthly in about a ten-year period (until my mother passed away a couple of years ago). While you were shocked to see midday water spraying along the I-5 corridor, in my experience, that was not a common occurrence.
When I was a kid, I remember most crops were irrigated with the old “flood and furrow” method. Thankfully, more crops are now irrigated with spraying. The other good news is that hanging pipes irrigation configurations are much more efficient than spraying. While you are correct in stating drip irrigation is more efficient than spraying, it’s probably better suited for perennials and shrubs instead of large-scale crop production across the Central Valley’s 20,000 square miles. I looked for data supporting your claim that drip irrigation is one thousand times more efficient than spraying but could not find one. Do you have a source?
It's about more than just nuts. The Central Valley uses about 1% of the nation’s farmland to grow more than 250 different crops. Those crops provide about 25% of the country’s food. I’m sure we can agree that even if we didn’t live in a region susceptible to droughts, we should use our water resources efficiently. Maybe that’s why landowners and farmers post signs critical of our past and present governors. Water is more precious than gold, and wisely building more dams is an important part of managing our water supplies. I guess the Central Valley’s landowners and farmers don’t see that happening. You suggested growing the right crops in the right place as an alternative. I’m sure that approach can be folded into a more comprehensive state water management program. Which crops would you plant and where?
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Mr. Sinks, I believe you hit upon the reason for growing almond trees – they’re high profit. If a crop isn’t profitable, I’m sore no farmer would bother growing it. As for water, as soon as the state does its fair share and shares the 50% of water flowing out to sea, we’d all be better off and perhaps those signs would disappear.
Good morning, Gus
I grew up in the Central Valley but now live in the Bay Area. I made that same trip almost monthly in about a ten-year period (until my mother passed away a couple of years ago). While you were shocked to see midday water spraying along the I-5 corridor, in my experience, that was not a common occurrence.
When I was a kid, I remember most crops were irrigated with the old “flood and furrow” method. Thankfully, more crops are now irrigated with spraying. The other good news is that hanging pipes irrigation configurations are much more efficient than spraying. While you are correct in stating drip irrigation is more efficient than spraying, it’s probably better suited for perennials and shrubs instead of large-scale crop production across the Central Valley’s 20,000 square miles. I looked for data supporting your claim that drip irrigation is one thousand times more efficient than spraying but could not find one. Do you have a source?
It's about more than just nuts. The Central Valley uses about 1% of the nation’s farmland to grow more than 250 different crops. Those crops provide about 25% of the country’s food. I’m sure we can agree that even if we didn’t live in a region susceptible to droughts, we should use our water resources efficiently. Maybe that’s why landowners and farmers post signs critical of our past and present governors. Water is more precious than gold, and wisely building more dams is an important part of managing our water supplies. I guess the Central Valley’s landowners and farmers don’t see that happening. You suggested growing the right crops in the right place as an alternative. I’m sure that approach can be folded into a more comprehensive state water management program. Which crops would you plant and where?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.