Trustee Noelia Corzo and I both ran for office because we wanted to do things differently and we wanted better outcomes. Our Superintendent, Diego Ochoa, joined the San Mateo-Foster City School District to bring his data-driven, equity-centered leadership to impact student outcomes. Together, we committed to putting pressure on our educational system for producing predictable patterns of achievement for years. We wanted better for our kids. All of our kids.
Producing better outcomes with data-centered leadership
- By Shara Watkins
- Updated
- 3
Recommended for you
Post a comment as Guest
Report
Watch this discussion. Stop watching this discussion.
Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Latest News
- Turmoil-hit 2030 French Alps Olympics lose CEO Cyril Linette in leadership shake-up
- Iranians worry over American military buildup as last-chance round of talks nears
- US futures are flat and global stocks gain after optimism about AI sends Wall Street higher
- Today in History: February 25, Muhammad Ali wins heavyweight title
- The Analytics of the Comeback: Exploring the Metrics Behind Local Prep and College Baseball’s Early-February Surges
- Japan demands the swift release of a Japanese national detained in Iran
- Residents want local governments to end contracts that let ICE train on their gun ranges
- This Day in History
Trending Stories
Articles
- Prometheus’ downtown presence grows
- Skiers from Bay Area killed in the Tahoe avalanche
- Bay Area disconnect
- Downtown San Mateo apartment proposal moves ahead
- Belmont residents sue over new development
- Foster City geese management shows early promise
- Brother ID'd as 2nd fatality and suspect in San Bruno fire
- Three Silicon Valley engineers indicted for stealing trade secrets from Google, other tech companies
- San Mateo man pleads no contest to felony DUI after hitting and dragging teen on e-bike
- San Mateo County death notices — Feb. 13 to Feb. 17, 2026
Commented
- The San Mateo school walk out, budding hypocrites? (16)
- Students protest ICE in San Mateo (14)
- Keep the Humboldt Street bike lanes (14)
- Just the facts (13)
- Hope for the younger generation (12)
- My experience walking out (11)
- The downsides to the Venezuelan raid (11)
- Woman, 90, fatally hit by car in Millbrae (11)
- The coefficient of honkification (10)
- Do not look away (10)
- The need for respectful leadership (9)
- Where is my America? (9)
- Governor’s race has a dilution problem (9)
- The top 10 most influential people (8)
- What are we going to do about it? (8)
- Loneliness, suicide and the crisis facing young men (8)
- Removing bike lanes will cost San Mateo taxpayers (8)
- 'Affordable' housing? (8)
- Trump-racist (8)
- Pedestrian killed on El Camino Real in San Mateo identified (7)
- Another way of looking at bike lane decision (7)
- Support for Rob Newsom (7)
- Belmont leaders push for ECR bike lanes (6)
- Papan introduces bill to target e-bike speed loophole (6)
- An open letter to Speaker Mike Johnson (6)
- An ax to grind? (6)
- Noncitizen voting (6)
- Others Who Made the List of Others (6)
- Burlingame eyes speed reductions (6)
- Issues with ICE (5)
- Keep bike lanes, residential parking permit program will help (5)
- ‘Support for Rob Newsom,’ hold on (5)
- ‘Love your neighbor’ is a practice, not a slogan (5)
- Following Trump off a cliff (5)
- San Mateo's Humboldt bike lanes to stay (5)
- 16-year-old who died in e-moto crash identified (5)
- Beyond (5)
- San Mateo should show fiscal restraint (5)
- No ‘downside’ to Maduro’s capture (5)
- SAVE Act won’t save anyone (5)
- Oil, politics and the health of the planet (5)
- I’m boycotting the State of the Union — here’s why (5)
- Baby Newsom (4)
- Does Vision Zero lower vehicle involved deaths? (4)
- North Delaware bike lane (4)
- Names in print (4)
- Autonomous vehicles deliver on the promise of safe driving (4)
- Condemning use of force against peaceful protesters (4)
- Making our streets safer (4)
- Support for Ukraine (4)
- Keep the North Central bike lanes (4)
- Keep supporting Ukraine (4)
- In solidarity with students (4)
- Your Berlin moment? (4)
- San Mateo County scopes e-bike ordinance (4)
- Bad decision (3)
- When winning is the only moral test (3)
- Why not try new bond package? (3)
- Pedestrian struck by car in San Mateo was ‘centerpiece’ of large family (3)
- Glazenwood will be historic district again (3)
- The Williams family (3)
- ¡Vivan los jóvenes! (3)
- Redwood City to improve Jefferson Avenue safety (3)
- Freedom and justice? (3)
- Invest in our children to secure San Mateo County’s future (3)
- Unhoused seniors, funding concerns San Mateo County (3)
- Sound familiar? (3)
- Colma BART depot opened 30 years ago (3)
- Resident misery: A tale of 2+ years (3)
- Bay Area disconnect (2)
- Downtown San Mateo Association welcomes new president (2)
- Dems love to tax (2)
- California school systems face red ink despite boosts in education spending (2)
- Honoring 100 years of service, struggle and solidarity (2)
- No to more taxes (2)
- Unhung heroes part 1 (2)
- How Trump negotiates (2)
- Historic preservation in San Mateo (2)
- Survey size (2)
- Selective fact presentation (2)
- Parcel tax could raise $12.2M for schools (2)
- Kudos to David Kristofferson (2)
- All Quiet on the Western Front (2)
- Groups warn of spreading ICE misinformation (2)
- Police: Distracted driving a more frequent concern (2)
- God help Ukraine (2)
- Ensuring a responsible transition to an AI-humancentric economy (2)
- Schools take on cellphone restrictions (2)
- Cuts approved for Redwood City School District (2)
- Informed letter writer (2)
- Please restore Humboldt parking spaces (2)
- E-bike education sought by San Mateo County leaders (2)
- Mollie Stone’s in San Mateo is set to close (2)
- ‘I won’t back down!’ (2)
- BART warning of 15 station closures if ballot measure fails (2)
- Beyond Epstein: human trafficking awareness (2)
- San Mateo County Superintendent Nancy Magee to retire (2)
- Dancing with the diesels (2)
Latest e-Edition
- To view our latest e-Edition click the image on the left.

(3) comments
What Ms. Watkins does not tell you what the baseline performance was for 6th graders prior to this switch. She throws in equity and averages to confound or please some readers. What happened to the higher achieving students? Are their scores averaged with the lower achievers to arrive at the so-called equity data that she is so exited about? No wonder many of us have lost faith in the public school system.
Hey, Dirk
Your post made me think of something I read many moons ago by Harold Geneen, "... words are words, explanations are explanations, promises are promises, but only performance is reality."
So if I understand this letter correctly, this 6th grade one math class fits all resulted in only a 1% increase in performance? Is this 1% statistically significant? Is the increase less than 1%, such as 0.51%, but rounded up to 1%? Now if we have higher achieving students “stuck” in a one class fits all because they have no other choice, wouldn’t they increase the overall student outcome? With the advent of COVID and distance learning, how did those issues and the demographics of absentees affect the overall score? I think we need more than preliminary data before we can conclude “something different” was successful. Performance metrics on how these 6th graders are doing in 7th grade? Have high achievers been hamstrung because they weren’t challenged to their ability in 6th grade?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.