While San Bruno is projecting a balanced general fund budget for the upcoming 2025-26 fiscal year, a projected structural deficit and unfunded capital and enterprise projects — like needed stormwater, street and parks upgrades — continue to loom amidst an uncertain economic landscape.
City Manager Alex McIntyre has a plan to begin updating the city’s outdated infrastructure he dubbed the “triple flip,” largely stemming from the San Bruno Community Foundation’s recent decision to commit its last $15 million to $20 million to a new Fire Station 52.
That frees up Measure Q funding — a property tax voted upon by residents to fund the fire station and street and stormwater repairs via $102 million in bonds — for a $40 million repaving plan which would have previously been paid for by Measure G.
Measure G funds, which come from a half-cent sales tax, will in turn have $17.5 million to contribute to the general fund, McIntyre said.
“We’re able to preserve services — in fact, enhance services,” he said.
That still leaves unfunded enterprise and capital improvement projects, Chief Financial Officer Nick Pegueros said during his presentation June 10. Enterprise fund revenue sits at $53.2 million for the upcoming fiscal year and expenditures at a whopping $126.6 million. Capital project revenue totals $40.2 million and expenditures at $56.6 million.
The general fund — which goes to essential resident services and employee salaries, among other functions — will be balanced for the upcoming year at $68.8 million, McIntyre said, due in large part to the choice to restrictively fund capital projects over the long term.
The city retains the majority of general fund revenue through taxes, however, McIntyre warned $19 million to $20 million in other revenue sources could be at risk — which is reflected in an upcoming structural deficit.
Recommended for you
Per the city’s budget document, a structural deficit of $1.15 million is projected by fiscal year 2026, growing to more than $4 million by 2030.
Around $7 million annually in vehicle license fees, typically given back to cities by the state, remain up in the air, and $6 million to $7 million from walmart.com remain pending until a lawsuit around sales tax sharing agreements results in a decision.
Another $3.7 million in revenue is at risk due to a 2024 bill that allows Native American tribes to sue card rooms for lost revenue, McIntyre said, and finally, the possibility that San Mateo County miscalculated its excess Educational Revenue Augmentation fees throws an additional $2 million in doubt.
Despite these concerns, San Bruno is moving forward with investments into council-selected priorities for the upcoming year. The most expensive priority could be Clean Up San Bruno, a plan to put $1.5 million into managing and abating garbage dumping, graffiti and keeping medians clean.
“It’s a big lift because we’ve gotten comfortable allowing people to dump crap in our city,” McIntyre said. “Whether it’s our own residents or outsiders, we don’t know but we’re going to get better at enforcement and figure that out.”
Other priorities include potential for a residential permit parking program, city communications and engagement and a strategic analysis of major city-owned properties.
The budget is scheduled for final approval June 24.
Folks, don’t fall for the sob story. San Bruno gets a $70 million settlement and they blow 70+% on a recreation center that will likely serve a minuscule portion of San Brunans (Bruno-ans?). Now San Bruno wants to blow the rest on a down payment for a new fire station which has no price tag and again, which will likely serve a minuscule portion of San Brunans.
San Bruno folks, remember this is the San Bruno who has already blown $4 million to get folks to pay for downtown parking. And still losing money because the program can’t pay for itself. Be sure to vote NO on any upcoming measures asking for your hard earned money for infrastructure or anything else, but mainly going to pay for ever increasing pensions and benefits and more pet, and wasteful, projects. And of course, to pay for the rest of the new fire station that has no price tag.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Folks, don’t fall for the sob story. San Bruno gets a $70 million settlement and they blow 70+% on a recreation center that will likely serve a minuscule portion of San Brunans (Bruno-ans?). Now San Bruno wants to blow the rest on a down payment for a new fire station which has no price tag and again, which will likely serve a minuscule portion of San Brunans.
San Bruno folks, remember this is the San Bruno who has already blown $4 million to get folks to pay for downtown parking. And still losing money because the program can’t pay for itself. Be sure to vote NO on any upcoming measures asking for your hard earned money for infrastructure or anything else, but mainly going to pay for ever increasing pensions and benefits and more pet, and wasteful, projects. And of course, to pay for the rest of the new fire station that has no price tag.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.