The San Bruno City Council unanimously voted to partner on the San Bruno Community Foundationās plan to spend the last of its funds ā around $15 million to $20 million ā on a new Fire Station No. 52.Ā
Foundation board members unanimously voted in May to wind down operations ā including its scholarship and community grants programs ā and spend the rest of its endowment on a large legacy project.Ā
Despite community member concerns that their input on what that project should be has not been heard, the foundation proceeded in its recommendation that the project should be rebuilding the outdated Fire Station No. 52.Ā
At its meeting May 27, the City Council agreed with that recommendation. The timing is right, Councilmember Michael Salazar said after the meeting, given that San Bruno recently passed a property-owner funded infrastructure bond that will give the city access to $102 million over time to fund street, stormwater and fire station repairs.Ā
āWe discussed a few different ideas of what that project could be. The fire station emerged as one that was most feasible, because we already decided we were already going forward with that project with additional funding through Measure Q,ā he said. āIt has momentum behind it and we were ready to move forward.āĀ
Though plans for a remodeled fire station donāt have a specific timeline or price tag attached to them as of yet, Mayor Rico Medina said, it will undoubtedly cost more than the foundationās $15 million to $20 million endowment. The Measure Q funding that has already been approved makes the partnership between the city and the foundation to build a new fire station a feasible reality.Ā
He reiterated points made by community foundation staff that a prolonged listening process would have set community expectations too high. The remaining funding wonāt cover a large-scale project like a new library in its entirety.Ā
āIf thereās no funding source, thereās nothing to do,ā he said. āWhat have we done? Weāve raised expectations.āĀ
The fire station is in dire need of repair, Medina said, and is both seismically unsound and without basic necessities like separate male and female restrooms. Built in 1957, itās one of the oldest fire stations in the county.Ā
āWeāve been very fortunate that we have firefighter personnel that have done very well with what they work with and serve the community well,ā he said. āWith an opportunity like this, it is time for us to join with the foundation and move forward on a project.āĀ
Councilmember Tom Hamilton acknowledged that there wasnāt enough community engagement that went into the project to explain to residents why a fire station remodel was one of the only feasible options for the foundationās remaining money.Ā
āI donāt think a good enough job was done about educating the public on the extreme need we have for replacing fire stations,ā he said. āWe should have had an open house, invite people to it ⦠anybody who walks in will say right away, āthis place needs to be replaced.āāĀ
He emphasized that the community foundation made an independent decision to sunset operations. The decision up for a council vote was only about whether or not to accept the money, Hamilton said.Ā
āThe question put to us was, āIf we try to give you $15 [million] to $19 million for a fire station, will you take it, yes or no?āā he said.
(1) comment
So San Bruno gets a $70 million settlement and they blow 70+% on a recreation center that will likely serve a minuscule portion of San Brunans (Bruno-ans?). And now San Bruno wants to blow the rest on a down payment for a new fire station which has no price tag and again, which will likely serve a minuscule portion of San Brunans? Instead of focusing on infrastructure or helping victims of the fire or spending money on whatever San Bruno is always asking taxpayers and homeowners to pay for? How much will it cost to repair the existing fire station? Iām betting it is less than $20 million. As for separate male and female restrooms, build an outhouse. Still less than $20 million. Meanwhile, whatās with the independent decision to blow the rest of the settlement money? Why not invest it until more worthy purposes appear?
Hey San Bruno folks, remember this the next time San Bruno floats measures to take more of your hard-earned money. San Bruno has already blown $4 million to get folks to pay for downtown parking. And still losing money because the program canāt pay for itself. Get ready for more measures asking for your hard earned money for infrastructure, but mainly going to pay for ever increasing pensions and benefits and more pet, and wasteful, projects. And of course, to pay for the rest of the new fire station that has no price tag.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.