SamTrans is weighing its options on how to narrow a structural operating deficit over the next decade.
The agency relies heavily on sales tax to maintain operations, with fare revenue only comprising about 5% of its operating budget. But sales tax revenue is expected to grow much slower than expenses, and fares haven’t increased since 2016.
“Approximately 70% of our sources are comprised of sales tax, and we assume less than 3% increase in sales tax revenue over the lifetime of the projection,” Chief Financial Officer Kate Jordan Steiner said.
The agency’s Board of Directors met Wednesday, April 9, to contemplate service reductions, fare increases and hiring freezes as potential cost-cutting measures to get back on track. Staff also offered options that could lower training, travel expenses and administrative costs. But even a combination of those may only make a modest dent in the shortfall. Board members such as David Canepa, also president of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, and Rico Medina, also mayor of San Bruno, said it was also important to consider layoffs or furloughs as a worst-case scenario.
“I think we should be talking about furloughs — worst case scenario — or the elimination of positions,” Canepa said. “Not to scare the organization, but it should be there.”
Recommended for you
Reducing costs — especially via service cuts or fare increases — while continuing to increase ridership has proved a difficult balance to maintain. Most board members were amenable to fare increases, and Board Member Josh Powell said he may be in favor of eliminating some of the Clipper card discounts if they are not boosting ridership. And Board Member Marie Chuang, also a member of the Hillsborough City Council, said she’s open to re-evaluating some of the bus routes, but only with the intention to optimize them, not simply to cut costs.
“We can't just take away things in the name of making up for the shortfall, because people’s perception does matter,” Chuang said. “They are going to look at the cuts and then not be interested in participating, because it’s a cost on them.”
The fiscal challenges are not unique to SamTrans, and in fact, the agency has a more favorable position than other major transit operators, such as Caltrain and BART. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the region’s transit financing agency, is looking at a Bay Area transit ballot measure, though if it passes, much of the funding would be prioritized for rail operators and agencies facing steeper shortfalls. However, given its proactive approach, SamTrans should also try to address some of its needs by way of regional measure, Board Member Brooks Esser said.
“I don't want to be having this meeting eight years from now, when we’re in the position of some of our fellow agencies,” Esser said. “Addressing it now and making sure that our needs are reflected in whatever regional measure is certainly something we should consider.”
Specific deficit figures will be available by the board meeting May 7.
Don't believe the nonsense. SamTrans has plenty of money. Just last year they
- they promised to install several hundreds of bus shelters
- bought a new HQ, because the old one wasn't shiny enough
- then they planned to upgrade more office buildings
- then they kept the old HQ, because they wanted to grow their office workforce
- then they didn't even install one new bus shelter
Which clearly tells us that A] they have money for all kinds of things B] they are not interested in providing customer service or increasing ridership.
Jeff Gee, Rico E. Medina, David Canepa and now Jackie Speier are running this as a Real Estate business - not a public transportation agency.
Folks, don’t fall for the scare-mongering and doomsday predictions. There will be more proposals for taxes and fees and fare increases, whilst there will be negligible savings from service reductions and administrative costs. Until SamTrans is willing to make the necessary cuts in service and personnel to better reflect ridership, vote NO on any proposals that will raise revenue to pay for ever increasing pension and benefit costs. Maybe we need a dedicated SamTrans DOGE panel. I bet some residents would serve, free of charge.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Don't believe the nonsense. SamTrans has plenty of money. Just last year they
- they promised to install several hundreds of bus shelters
- bought a new HQ, because the old one wasn't shiny enough
- then they planned to upgrade more office buildings
- then they kept the old HQ, because they wanted to grow their office workforce
- then they didn't even install one new bus shelter
Which clearly tells us that A] they have money for all kinds of things B] they are not interested in providing customer service or increasing ridership.
Jeff Gee, Rico E. Medina, David Canepa and now Jackie Speier are running this as a Real Estate business - not a public transportation agency.
Folks, don’t fall for the scare-mongering and doomsday predictions. There will be more proposals for taxes and fees and fare increases, whilst there will be negligible savings from service reductions and administrative costs. Until SamTrans is willing to make the necessary cuts in service and personnel to better reflect ridership, vote NO on any proposals that will raise revenue to pay for ever increasing pension and benefit costs. Maybe we need a dedicated SamTrans DOGE panel. I bet some residents would serve, free of charge.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.