Most of San Mateo County hasn’t gained much traction in the Bay Area’s burgeoning artificial intelligence boom, widening an existing chasm between the county and startup hotbeds like San Francisco and Palo Alto.

Jeremiah Owyang, an investor and partner at Blitzscaling Ventures, said AI presence in the county, perhaps apart from Menlo Park, is pretty light and doesn’t seem to be growing much, concentrated largely in San Francisco and Palo Alto. 

Recommended for you

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(1) comment

easygerd

C/CAG has still not decided if San Mateo wants to keep being a bedroom community to San Francisco, Palo Alto, and San Jose or create “Livable Communities” attractive so residents stay and work in town.

Actually, I take that back, San Mateo County has absolutely decided they want to be just a bedroom community to the big guys. These projects prove as much:

spending billions of dollars on highway-widenings of US-101 and I-280

Spending even more on a variety of highway intersections

Improvement of service on Caltrain (regional transportation)

Reduction of service at SamTrans (local transportation)

Hardly any investment on local, liveable communities.

Still no bike lane network in the county

Compare that to the three cities mentioned in the article all have projects to improve transportation around their cities:

SF has Muni, Bart, Caltrian streetcars, and bike lanes

Palo Alto has VTA, Stanford Shuttles, Caltrain, and bike lanes

Menlo Park is buying into the “Livable Community” idea

The rest of the county has an unhealthy fascination with car-centric development. Oh and San Mateo and Redwood City have segregated their schools on purpose - That is not exactly regarded as a good sign of sound leadership running your county. These are signs that corruption runs high here and you have to pay your way through the politics of your town. New startup companies don’t like that.

If you want to attract young, new companies you need to have cheap office space in downtowns, solid restaurants, good shops, great schools and investment in various options of transportation. … basically what’s called “Liveable Communities”.

San Mateo City council members Nicole Fernandez and Danielle Cwirko-Godycki are more concerned about getting weed shops into downtown than having safe-routes-to-school or livable communities. Now those are some messed up priorities for city leadership. You are not attracting smart companies into the same downtown with that kind of attitude.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here