More concerns are popping up during the early stages of a project that would extend the Highway 101 express lanes north of Interstate 380.
The current express lanes, which opened about two years ago, stretches 22 miles on Highway 101 from the Santa Clara County line to Interstate 380. Starting around 2020, the San Mateo County Transportation Authority began conducting research on expanding the project north of the interstate, either by converting an existing lane into an express lane or constructing a brand-new one.
The initiative is in the environmental and preliminary design phase, a multiyear effort that is expected to be completed by the middle or end of 2026.
Jackie Speier, TA board member and San Mateo County supervisor, said she was concerned about the county spending $10 million during this early stage before a decision is even solidified.
“With all the needs in this county right now, with all these grade separations that have inadequate funding, to move forward with this is something, I think, we should pause and think about,” she said.
Staff and other board members have pointed out the funding is already allocated for highway-specific projects and that most of the $10 million has already been spent.
“We want to see the data. I want to see what the potential impacts could be in South San Francisco, in that neighborhood which would be close to the freeway. Would there be an increase in carbon emissions, in [vehicle miles traveled]?” Mark Nagales, TA board member and South San Francisco councilmember, said. “I want to give our staff and the TA the appropriate time to do the necessary background and research and data collection to make a determination.”
Because the express lanes have now been open for officially two years, Dan Lieberman, TA spokesperson, said via email that the agency will start “comparing the lane performance from the prior year” and are in the process of “reviewing available data and scoping a study with additional metrics.”
The agency has said that extending the express lanes north of Interstate 380 could also incentivize carpooling, though it’s unclear whether that’s been realized on the current express lanes. Because drivers self-report how many passengers are in their cars, TA staff have said the number of carpoolers is likely inflated. During a recent Citizens Advisory Committee meeting, Lacy Vong, policy program manager for the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority, said there is “no data source” that can improve verification and that the number of people who are misdeclaring is likely “pretty high.”
During the meeting, TA Chair Carlos Romero said he’d like to move forward with the preliminary phase.
“This is, to say the least, somewhat of a controversial project because it is freeway widening,” Romero said. “The reason I think it makes sense to continue with the analysis is that perhaps the option of doing this is a nonhighway expansion project — that is, converting an existing lane into a toll lane — could indeed make sense given we are about $7 million into this project.”
Initial estimates on the total construction costs for the express lanes expansion could range from $250 million to $350 million.
(6) comments
There are a ton of problems with these HOT lanes, but let's make it short
1. It was never meant as a "green" project - SMCTA created a highway widening project
2. David Canepa Diane Papan, Gina Papan, Rico E. Medina, etc. brought therefore MORE air pollution into Equity Focus Areas (like North Central or North Fair Oaks)
3. SMCTA decided to put an "Equity Program" in place, where low-income drivers get free fastrack budget to pollute Equity Focus Areas even more so
4. It was always supposed to IMPROVE congestion and with 'improvement' they mean MORE congestion.
5. Because MORE congestion requires MORE fixing meaning more infrastructure
6. Real Estate and car-infrastructure development are two of most-corrupted industry branches in California (probably world-wide)
7. HOT lanes would require more enforcement, increasing the cost and therefore leaving no benefits of the program to pay back the $600M anytime soon
One of the projects to counter the air pollution brought to San Mateo were the Humboldt Bike Lanes, which Diane Papan and Amo Lee opposed.
Just recently Mayor Rob Newsom and District 2 council member Nicole Fernandez also endorsed more air pollution in the North Central Equity Focus Area.
And just for the record - these are all San Mateo Democrats doing this.
I agree with Supervisor Speire that more information is needed before we spend precious dollars without understanding the full picture.
Of note, “Because drivers self-report how many passengers are in their cars, TA staff have said the number of carpoolers is likely inflated.” So single occupancy drivers who flip the switch on their FasTrak toll tag to a “free ride” setting are unable to be detected? I do see a number of single drivers in Express Lanes and it's be interesting to know if they've toggled to the honest setting. Will, “Sorry, officer, I forgot to change the setting?” pass muster if they're ever caught?
Meanwhile, I assume carbon emissions are the least of County worries? It’s more important to pay union labor for another project that will increase congestion? Oh yes, and hopefully provide some revenue to offset the average $300 million price tag to install the lanes. Perfect. As Not So Common says, “only in democrat run California.”
TBot - The price tag was $600M or $30M per mile. Which will never be paid back.
Especially as other surveys have shown 40-60% of HOV users are probably cheating - one way or another.
This is the kind of project that was "endorsed" by YIMBY-connected companies and Unions. These are all San Mateo Democrats doing this, which should prove to San Mateo voters there is no concern for San Mateo Democrats about "Climate Change" or "Sustainability". It is all pretend for them.
There was no public outcry for this project. There was no grassroots non-profit pushing for this. All opposition was denied.
This project just happened because the late Don Horsley, Diane Papan, Rico E. Medina and certain companies wanted it.
https://ccag.ca.gov/us-101-express-lanes-project/
It’s 100% factual, fasttrak make traffic congestion, worse. The math is simple, put all the cars in 3/4ths of the lanes available and expect traffic to decrease? Only in democrat run California does make sense and need a new study. Good grief
They widened the highway to install the express lane and yet now they are saying that traffic is worse. More lanes means more traffic.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.