Editor,
As we approach the last week of 2025, it’s worth taking a look ahead to the rumored revenue measures for the November 2026 election cycle in the city of San Mateo.
Editor,
As we approach the last week of 2025, it’s worth taking a look ahead to the rumored revenue measures for the November 2026 election cycle in the city of San Mateo.
First, there’s a potential citizens’ initiative ballot measure stemming from California Senate Bill 63 (2025), which with a majority vote would increase the sales tax in San Mateo County by one half cent to fund transit agencies like BART and Caltrain.
In addition, the Daily Journal reported that the San Mateo County Community College District and the San Mateo-Foster City School District are each considering placing bond measures, loans that are paid for by increasing property taxes, on next year’s ballot. The college district’s proposal comes as its former chancellor Ron Galatolo faces a jury trial on 23 felony counts including embezzlement and misappropriation of taxpayer funds, which raises concerns about the district’s governance and fiscal stewardship.
As for the school district, voters approved Measure T in November 2020 with 64% of the vote, resulting in $409 million in bond revenue, which calls into question the need for its new ask.
Finally, councilmembers in the city of San Mateo are weighing a quarter-cent sales tax measure to help close a $15.2 million budget gap for the 2025-26 fiscal year. It is incumbent upon every voter to carefully review the text of each measure when they are released over the coming months and to consider the outcomes of past tax measures before voting in November.
John O’Bryan
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Well written, Mr. O’Bryan. I’d recommend everyone vote NO as their default. Voters should also review what cities and counties have squandered money on in the past and review how many raises union workers have received. It is more than likely that most, if not all, of the money from these tax proposals is going to pay for ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. I’m sure everyone will still vote NO after they’ve had a chance to review the text of each measure.
Remember the train-to-nowhere that was promised at $10 billion and now, after 17 years, no track has been laid and the total cost is estimated at up to $128 billion. This project was always seen as a union worker giveaway. I’m betting most folks alive today will never see the culmination of the full LA to SF route. But I’m also betting there are folks who started working on the train-to-nowhere who will retire having to never work on another project.
You get the government you vote for – and California is a government that will never tire of squandering your money. Remember the $76 billion in welfare fraud? The $30 billion in EDD fraud? The $billions given to union workers for the train-to-nowhere? Increased gas taxes? Increased property taxes? The $24 billion spent to tackle homelessness – resulting in more homeless folks? Vote NO on every tax proposal.
As a side note… It appears California will not sign onto Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act that exempts federal taxes on tipped wages and overtime pay which means the state wants to continue taking taxes from your your tipped wages and overtime pay exempt from federal taxes. Again, vote NO on every tax proposal.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.