Library hours, various city staff positions and several community programs were presented to the Redwood City Council as potential cuts at the mid-year budget study session Monday.
Those budget cuts were recommended by city staff in anticipation of a looming deficit, which City Manager Melissa Stevenson Diaz said would hit $3.8 million by July and $12 million within five years if the city fails to find new revenue sources and trim existing costs.
For fiscal year 2018-19, staff recommended eliminating 17.1 budgeted city staff positions, including nine vacant positions in the fire and police departments, and filled positions, including the fire department’s emergency preparedness coordinator, several library assistants, city manager intern and other “casual labor” roles, such as front desk and phone operators, according to a staff report.
Other recommended cuts proposed in the staff report include a reduction in combined library hours from 208 to 161 per week, and the elimination of funding for the Familias Unidas at Hoover and Hawes schools program, which serves about 80 families a year. The report also recommends cutting the Schaberg and American Scores after-school programs, which will affect 130 students, as well as Shakespeare in the Park.
Collectively, the recommended cuts for fiscal year 2018-19 total $3.8 million. The report also suggests cuts for fiscal year 2019-20 totaling $2.2 million.
Even though Redwood City is experiencing a construction boom and city revenue — estimated at $140 million — are higher than projected, Diaz said the council directed staff to reduce expenditures for a variety of reasons, most notably rising pension costs, flat sales and hotel tax revenue and the need to prepare for a future economic downtown.
According to the staff report, increases in general fund expenditures for the current fiscal year are primarily attributed to $5.4 million in transfers associated with implementation of the Docktown Plan, which requires payments to relocate residents there.
During the Monday meeting, members of the Community Emergency Response Team, a disaster preparedness program facing cuts, made a strong showing. Numerous speakers implored the council to leave the program fully intact, including funding for its emergency preparedness coordinator, Christy Adonis, who is vital to the program.
“In light of the recent increase in disasters both natural and manmade, I do not believe that cutting budgets to first responders of any kind is a good idea,” said Greg Schmidt, a CERT member. “I hope it doesn’t take a large-scale emergency to realize how valuable Christy and CERT is.”
In fact, nearly everyone who spoke during the study session’s public comment period expressed support for CERT.
Recommended for you
Every member of the council responded with praise for CERT, and several councilmembers, including John Seybert and Janet Borgens, said they’re confident staff will find a way to keep the program intact.
As for possible cuts to library and youth programs, several councilmembers expressed concern.
“My overall read of the budget is a lot of what we’re cutting is programs that serve young people and that worries me,” Councilwoman Shelly Masur said.
In response, Diaz said that staff, for the most part, tried to preserve youth programs, and suggested it’s easy to forget how many programs have been preserved when considering the few up for reductions.
Councilman Jeff Gee suggested any future cuts are largely due to rising pension costs and that responsibility for those cuts should not lie solely on the Redwood City Council.
“I know one speaker is angry at the council but I would hope that that speaker also shares some anger at the California Public Employees’ Retirement System board,” Gee said. “There are cities around the state — and I think one in this county — that have already declared a fiscal emergency because of the outlook of city budgets and these significant increases in contributions for which we really don’t have a choice.”
At the end of Monday’s meeting, Mayor Ian Bain stressed that the council is only considering these cuts for the first time. A study session on potential new sources of revenue is scheduled for April.
Explain to me exactly the benefit of allowing all of the new development Redwood City? I thought at least it would generate some additional tax revenue.
I find these proposed services cuts extremely distressing! For the last 10 years I have watched the city landscape be transformed by the use of eminent domain to add tens of thousands of housing units. The population of Redwood City has been on a steady increase. With the increase in population, we long-term residents have seen the increase in traffic congestion, limited parking and cutbacks in water availability, in a general decline in quality of life. What we have not seen use any new land resources being created for Parks and Recreation (not counting the noisiest dog park in the world). As the city leaders continue to make available every foot of available land in the city limits to developers, one would think that this would lead to a better community for us. Yet here we are looking at cutbacks in our basic services! I believe it is time to challenge city leadership on their development centric approach to changing the landscape of Redwood City.
Redwood City's budget financial problems will likely only worsen if the rent control proponents have their way in November. Property taxes, Redwood City's largest single source of revenue, will be lower under rent control than they would be absent rent control. The community will be asked to suffer more service cuts should rent control become the law of the land in Redwood City.
Very astute of you to see what Diana Reddy and wrecking crew would do if rent control passes and or Ms. Reddy the Socialist gets a council chair. Let's work hard and smart to make sure neither happens!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(6) comments
Redwood City 2025
https://twitter.com/650_922/status/970542423356030977
Explain to me exactly the benefit of allowing all of the new development Redwood City? I thought at least it would generate some additional tax revenue.
I find these proposed services cuts extremely distressing!
For the last 10 years I have watched the city landscape be transformed by the use of eminent domain to add tens of thousands of housing units. The population of Redwood City has been on a steady increase. With the increase in population, we long-term residents have seen the increase in traffic congestion, limited parking and cutbacks in water availability, in a general decline in quality of life.
What we have not seen use any new land resources being created for Parks and Recreation (not counting the noisiest dog park in the world). As the city leaders continue to make available every foot of available land in the city limits to developers, one would think that this would lead to a better community for us. Yet here we are looking at cutbacks in our basic services! I believe it is time to challenge city leadership on their development centric approach to changing the landscape of Redwood City.
Redwood City's budget financial problems will likely only worsen if the rent control proponents have their way in November. Property taxes, Redwood City's largest single source of revenue, will be lower under rent control than they would be absent rent control. The community will be asked to suffer more service cuts should rent control become the law of the land in Redwood City.
Very astute of you to see what Diana Reddy and wrecking crew would do if rent control passes and or Ms. Reddy the Socialist gets a council chair. Let's work hard and smart to make sure neither happens!
Mike, amen to that.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.