Caltrain’s cumulative operating deficit may exceed half a billion dollars over the next decade without significant changes in ridership, funding and other factors, according to a new report on the transit system’s financial outlook.
Passengers who ride Caltrain at least four times per week fell by nearly half. In 2019, 68 percent of Caltrain riders rode four or more times a week.
Caltrain’s future is complicated by San Francisco having one of the worst economic recoveries from the COVID-19 pandemic in North America.
As a result, Caltrain’s annual deficit based on projected service and ridership is expected to eclipse $50 million per year as soon as the 2025 fiscal year and reach as high as $84 million by the 2033 fiscal year.
That cumulative deficit would reach an estimated $560 million over the next decade, Alex Burnett, a partner at the consulting firm, told Caltrain’s governing board Thursday.
“The fiscal cliff is looming for many, if not all of the transit agencies,” Burnett said. “Federal funding is exhausted and will be soon, certainly over the coming fiscal years. Ridership recovery is slow. ... It is likely that we will need a regional, state or federal funding solution.”
The funding troubles will not affect Caltrain’s efforts to fully electrify its fleet of trains by next year, as the transit network received $43 million in federal funding from last year’s $1.7 trillion federal omnibus spending bill to complete the project by fall 2024.
However, according to the report from Burnett, the operating costs of electrification are expected to rise significantly, eclipsing Caltrain’s annual spending on employee wages and benefits within the next two years.
Caltrain board members expressed opposition to raising fares or cutting service in the short term to improve finances.
Recommended for you
Board member and Santa Clara County Supervisor Cindy Chavez suggested lowering fares for a short time to give riders an incentive to return.
“Even if it’s 100,000 riders, getting more people back used to using transit, to me, feels like a really good investment,” she said.
Cutting service would have a limited effect on Caltrain’s budget, Burnett said, as public rail transit has a high amount of fixed costs, like operating and maintenance.
Caltrain could ultimately be a beneficiary of a potential long-term funding measure that regional transportation officials aim to put on a future ballot, but the approval of such a measure is no sure thing.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission — the region’s transit coordination body — is considering placing a $10 billion housing bond on the November 2024 ballot, The agency says it would support the development of more than 45,000 affordable housing units across the Bay Area’s nine counties.
Transit officials have expressed reluctance to place housing and transit funding measures on the same ballot, anticipating that voters may shy away from approving multiple bond measures or regional tax increases at the same time.
As a result, a potential long-term transit funding measure would likely be placed on the 2026 or 2028 ballots, officials with BART said in January during a discussion of its own financial problems.
A transit funding measure would likely support either the Bay Area’s five main counties — San Francisco, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo and Contra Costa — or all nine counties across the region.
Caltrain would benefit in either case as a rail operator in San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.
$500 million over 10 years? That is a drop in the bucket. If San Francisco alone can spend 200 to 300 million bucks per year on a bottomless pit such as the homeless industry, it can contribute those missing $50 million per year. That would actually help our society. We need to have a well functioning public transportation system such as CalTrain, and finding funding is just a matter of priorities.
Why is it that these folks only focus on increasing ridership (i.e. revenue) when the train may have left the station in regards to increasing ridership? I read nothing here about reducing costs? Why don’t we reduce costs in lockstep with the reduction in ridership (i.e. labor, or taking trains out of service)? If there’s an increase in ridership and we need more personnel or trains, act accordingly. You can bet your bottom dollar, or millions of dollars, there will be more and more pleas in the near and far future to support this endeavor, even though decreased ridership may become permanent.
Caltrain cares about ridership more than a lot of other transit services because pre-pandemic it got the vast majority of its money from fares.
The problem with reducing service is that most of Caltrain's expenses are fixed, and reducing service is a surefire way to reduce ridership even more and end up with more traffic on 101.
There are some major ways to cut costs once electrification is complete, though. This thread on Twitter has good, actionable ideas that I hope Caltrain will adopt: https://twitter.com/clem_tillier/status/1643814421968601088
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
$500 million over 10 years? That is a drop in the bucket. If San Francisco alone can spend 200 to 300 million bucks per year on a bottomless pit such as the homeless industry, it can contribute those missing $50 million per year. That would actually help our society. We need to have a well functioning public transportation system such as CalTrain, and finding funding is just a matter of priorities.
Why is it that these folks only focus on increasing ridership (i.e. revenue) when the train may have left the station in regards to increasing ridership? I read nothing here about reducing costs? Why don’t we reduce costs in lockstep with the reduction in ridership (i.e. labor, or taking trains out of service)? If there’s an increase in ridership and we need more personnel or trains, act accordingly. You can bet your bottom dollar, or millions of dollars, there will be more and more pleas in the near and far future to support this endeavor, even though decreased ridership may become permanent.
Caltrain cares about ridership more than a lot of other transit services because pre-pandemic it got the vast majority of its money from fares.
The problem with reducing service is that most of Caltrain's expenses are fixed, and reducing service is a surefire way to reduce ridership even more and end up with more traffic on 101.
There are some major ways to cut costs once electrification is complete, though. This thread on Twitter has good, actionable ideas that I hope Caltrain will adopt: https://twitter.com/clem_tillier/status/1643814421968601088
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.