A state ruling has affirmed claims over unfair labor practices within the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office, after an official complaint was filed last fall in an early move by whistleblowers to raise public concern and awareness of the Christina Corpus administration. 

Evidence of unilateral changes without union conference in regards to minimum staffing levels and mandatory overtime, interference and domination by the administration, and undermining the authority of the union was found within the Sheriff’s Office by the Public Employment Relations Board. The state agency that investigates and mediates labor issues for public agencies issued a formal complaint against San Mateo County April 3. 

Recommended for you

ana@smdailyjournal.com

(65) 344-5200 ext. 106

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Dirk van Ulden

With the plethora of laws in this country, it is astounding that we have not been able to sideline her as the inevitable looms. She is now nothing but a liability and is probably not managing her elected position. At this rate Corpus may well last until the next election. All we have to show for so far is political hay for some and a hefty multi-million dollar bill that could have been avoided had the SM County attorneys analyzed the consequences of this recall process before it was placed on the ballot. An expensive and seemingly useless effort indeed. Meanwhile, Corpus is crying all the way to the bank and laughing at us.

Pacman

It will be worth every cent when she’s banished from the Sheriff’s Office and the law enforcement community!

Pacman

For the naysayers of the Cordell report. The PERB’s findings adds another pound of credibility to Cordell’s findings and adds another nail in Corpus’s termination coffin. Speaking of “findings.” Anxiously waiting for the DA’s Office findings. Which could be the coup de grâce.

Ray Fowler

I think you're right. If Steve Wagstaffe's team lays out a criminal case against Christina and Victor, then Christina must ask herself if she is truly qualified to lead the Sheriff's Office. The question was already answered by San Mateo County voters.

Ray Fowler

The walls are closing in on the sheriff. It's sad our county has come to this... it's also sad the sheriff is unaware those walls are inching closer and closer.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here