Editor,
Why should public transportation receive more support?
Editor,
Why should public transportation receive more support?
• It improves the climate. (Climate change is the most important issue of our time. If we do not solve it, humans and life as we know it will perish. The sooner we solve it, the less it will cost in the long term).
• It is critical for the most vulnerable in society — those who cannot drive: the disabled, low-income, the elderly and others.
• It is better for public health by reducing air pollution.
• It preserves and creates jobs resulting in less unemployment.
• It reduces traffic congestion.
If public transportation is not adequately funded, it leads to service curtailments and reductions. Less service means that people cannot or will not use it because it becomes impractical and inconvenient. People will resort to cars if wait times are greater than 15 minutes.
This leads to fewer public transport riders, leading to more service cuts and a death spiral for the system.
Public transportation should receive more rather than less funding. Instead of funding additional highways and freeway lanes, these funds should be diverted to public transportation. Highway funds should be used only for maintenance and especially for maintenance of our city streets which are in terrible condition.
For these reasons, I urge public officials to support and improve public transportation.
Jerry McBride
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Public Transportation doesn't reduce traffic congestion, it basically relies on it.
This county just spent $600M to increase car capacity along the 101 corridor. There are several intersections and grade separation projects in the pipeline that will cost billions of dollars more in car infrastructure. But more car capacity and faster commutes lure people away from public transportation. So of course ridership is low until that capacity is filled up again. If the County Board of Supervisors and the various politicians sitting on various transportation boards make expensive mistakes like this, they will always have to ask for a bailout.
Jerry - I agree with you that public transportation is vital and should make economic sense as well. As a BART rider for years I was always grateful for that option to get to work. Funding is a matter of priorities and political fortitude. If SF apparently has close to a billion dollars to spend on the never-ending homeless crisis that handles less than 10,000 cases per year but funds a few hundred NGOs, one wonders how well our tax money is targeted. Then as the Sacramento legislature has mentioned, the public transportation agencies have become lucrative employment entities and have lost sight of their true purpose. It will take courage to take on the labor unions, the NGOs, become less dependent on vote buying and reprioritize our funding structures.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.