Editor,
Change over constancy is not always the best choice when one has a vote. Such is the case on the ballot in San Bruno between the two candidates for mayor who have the same last name — Medina.
Editor,
Change over constancy is not always the best choice when one has a vote. Such is the case on the ballot in San Bruno between the two candidates for mayor who have the same last name — Medina.
In addition to Rico Medina’s depth of experience and passion for San Bruno, is the constancy he has demonstrated that San Bruno residents don’t live in a vacuum. They are part of the greater Bay Area, thus need to be at the table when regional issues such as transportation, health and safety, etc. are being discussed.
Rico Medina’s long service on regional boards has greatly benefited San Bruno. Supported by 11 San Mateo County mayors, Rico was appointed to the San Mateo County Transit Authority. As a result, with Rico’s advocacy/vote, San Bruno received not only $1.4 million for the Huntington Bike/Pedestrian thoroughfare but also $4.5 million for the SSF Linden/Scott Street San Bruno pedestrian walkway (no vehicle access; no homes lost).
Rico is also chair of ALS/JPA (Ambulance Life Support/Joint Powers Authority and vice chair, the San Mateo County Emergency Services Council nominated by Warren Slocum, president of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, who has also endorsed Rico.
Until recently, I resided for decades in San Bruno where I was engaged with the city in volunteer and professional capacities. Not only does Rico recognize the importance of building relationships with neighboring cities to strengthen San Bruno, he is also a relationship builder with San Bruno residents, schools, the business and nonprofit sectors. Rico Medina’s focus/constancy on the welfare of San Bruno has never wavered in his volunteer, appointed or elected capacities. Constancy over change.
Nancy Kraus
Millbrae
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
We shouldn't forget that Rico Medina was instrumental in creating looming "Fiscal Cliff" by sabotaging SamTrans and Caltrain in various ways:
- He helped waste $600 million on a highway-widening bringing more air and micro-plastic pollution to Equity Focus Areas in San Mateo County.
- At the same time that project prevented two pedestrian crossings at Hillsdale Blvd and in San Carlos - for these Rico Medina did not find it in his heart or his immense county wallet to help.
- The 101 highway widening also helped to move ridership away from Caltrain and towards cars, therefore exacerbating the "Fiscal Cliff".
- Also reducing ridership and enhancing financial issues was the "SamTrans Reimagining" project, which reduced local service in San Mateo County.
- "SamTrans Reimagining" moved SamTrans from local East-West transportation option to a more North-South transportation option
- That in turn increased competition with Caltrain, reducing their ridership
- Splitting Caltrain and SamTrans and now have 2 CEOs, 2 administrations and 3 or 4 headquarters plus another one or two additional administration buildings (I lost track).
- On the other hand customers are also still waiting for the bus shelter project to show results. The consultants are paid, but where are the shelters?
- The cost overrun of Electrification at Caltrain also happened under his watch.
- Not to mention all the time and money wasted on the Dumbarton Railroad Bridge project prevented by "local political dysfunction" [NYT].
With all these fiscal issues, Rico Medina also sounds like he is still opposing a much needed merger of various Bay Area transportation agencies, which could reduce the number of HQs and create some synergies and service improvements for customers.
In his various roles, Rico Medina has done a lot of damage to the County.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.