Editor,
I am frustrated to learn that Jerry Hill, former San Mateo mayor and state senator, opposes the current ballot measure to improve our stormwater infrastructure in the “Stormwater fee up for vote” article on Nov. 27.
Editor,
I am frustrated to learn that Jerry Hill, former San Mateo mayor and state senator, opposes the current ballot measure to improve our stormwater infrastructure in the “Stormwater fee up for vote” article on Nov. 27.
I voted for Jerry on a number of occasions throughout his years of public service. I’ve come to learn that when Jerry had the opportunity as mayor in the early ’90s to think long term and put stormwater infrastructure reserves in place using city monies, similar to how nearby Peninsula cities acted, he did not act in the long-term best interest of San Mateans; instead, he kicked the can down the road.
Now instead of hopping on the current wave of support by residents, businesses and city organizations alike, he is choosing not to? Why someone who recognizes the need and the opportunity to right the wrongs of the past would oppose the solution at hand is simply unfathomable to me. The city has explained on a number of occasions how the rainy-day reserves are already allocated to keep the city in a strong fiscal position. Jerry didn’t use these funds for extensive stormwater infrastructure when he was in a position to more easily do so, why would he expect others to do the same?
Jerry’s lack of action in the ’90s, among other leaders’ lack of action over decades on this particular front, is precisely why our entire neighborhood flooded last winter.
Passing this stormwater infrastructure fee is an important step for San Mateo.
Isadora Freel
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
Sorry, Isadora, but as you freely admit, the city has rainy-day reserves. What better use of rainy-day reserves than to prevent rainy days from flooding neighborhoods? Money has been allocated, in the past, to stormwater infrastructure and maintenance. Vote NO on the fee. Don’t bail out fiscally irresponsible city leaders or folks who rolled the dice against Mother Nature and lost.
Municipal "rainy day funds" are intended for unexpected adverse events. Maintaining and upgrading infrastructure is not what they're for. I share the original author's disappointment that past Councils were not more proactive about this. It's surprising given that as a State Senator, Jerry Hill was quite active in promoting electrification and climate action, and previously served on the CA Air Resources Board where he was an early proponent of EVs. He definitely understands the climate issue.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.