Redwood City adopted new prohibitions on smoking in public places, restricting its allowance in pedestrian malls and in front of restaurant and bar entrances, in an effort to reduce those affected by secondhand smoke.
After gathering feedback from the public, city staff and the council agreed to ban smoking on the closed-off Broadway pedestrian mall as well as within 20 feet of restaurant and bar entrances, exits and operable windows.
The public health initiative to ban smoking in the public rights-of way is just one of the efforts the city is undertaking in regards to its tobacco regulations, Economic Development Manager Amanda Anthony said. City staff will return in coming months to present its findings on permitting tobacco retailers in the city.
Public polling and scientific data on secondhand smoke demonstrated a desire to restrict tobacco use in areas where patrons congregate.
Secondhand smoke has negative public health impacts, even when the exposure occurs outdoors, and to avoid the harm a person must be 20 to 29 feet away from the source, Anthony said.
“Secondhand smoke is a real problem, it’s toxic, it kills and I’m glad we are addressing it,” Councilmember Diane Howard said it’s not only a health issue.
“How about the loss of income to a business next door that has to be absorbing the secondhand smoke because people will decide not to go there anymore,” she said.
City staff did not recommend further restrictions to places like public sidewalks because they felt it would be too restrictive, Anthony said, but will likely look toward establishing designated smoking areas in the future.
Recommended for you
“This is an addiction and people do need a place to smoke, so let’s treat this with grace,” Anthony said.
Previously, smoking was prohibited in Redwood City in all indoor spaces, in or around multiunit residences, city parks and Courthouse Square. Along with San Carlos, Redwood City has been one of the more lenient when compared to similar cities nearby in regards to regulation of tobacco use in public areas.
The matter of enforcement was questioned by councilmembers Chris Sturken and Marcella Padilla. Redwood City Police Chief Kristina Bell said officers often use discretion when issuing citations.
“What is the extent of prohibition and enforcement in this ordinance that we can implement without coming down hardest on the communities targeted by the makers of these products,” Sturken said.
Sturken proposed a friendly amendment that police must issue a written warning before any fiscal penalties are inflicted, and was seconded by Padilla, but the motion ultimately failed.
Fellow councilmembers said they felt the Redwood City police officers should use their judgment, and felt they would likely issue warnings before citations, still.
The public should not call 911 to report people smoking in prohibited areas, Bell added, but could call the nonemergency number, (650) 780-7118, instead. However, officers must witness the smoking in person to issue any sort of citation, and it will likely be a warning at first.
The staff recommended ordinance to restrict smoking in pedestrian malls and in front of restaurants and bars was approved 5-2, with Sturken and Padilla opposing.
"Sanctuary city?" Good one, not so common. How about adding S to the usual suspects of the LG (you name it) alphabet soup? smokers are as marginalized as you can get.
Based on past city council meetings, I had expected that RW City would have declared itself a "sanctuary city for smokers." Sounds like bizarro world RW City will only be targeting the wealthy and white privileged smokers "without coming down hardest on the communities targeted by the makers of these products." Poor victims of target marketing can't control themselves. Does this ban include Mary Jane?
A few years back, RWC came down hard on Hookah bars as well. That one was too "middle eastern" for the taste of some older city council members.
They do like Cannabis shops though. They hoped to make big money from those. Not sure how they felt if more "middle eastern" than "white privileged smokers/slackers" would hang out at the Cannabis shops? It's worth a thought.
Either way so far those shops might have created more problems than revenue.
So yes, the whole smoking thing is handled a little uneven. They want the money, but don't want the smoke itself.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
Enforcement at bus stops would solve 90% of the problem.
"Sanctuary city?" Good one, not so common. How about adding S to the usual suspects of the LG (you name it) alphabet soup? smokers are as marginalized as you can get.
Based on past city council meetings, I had expected that RW City would have declared itself a "sanctuary city for smokers." Sounds like bizarro world RW City will only be targeting the wealthy and white privileged smokers "without coming down hardest on the communities targeted by the makers of these products." Poor victims of target marketing can't control themselves. Does this ban include Mary Jane?
A few years back, RWC came down hard on Hookah bars as well. That one was too "middle eastern" for the taste of some older city council members.
They do like Cannabis shops though. They hoped to make big money from those. Not sure how they felt if more "middle eastern" than "white privileged smokers/slackers" would hang out at the Cannabis shops? It's worth a thought.
Either way so far those shops might have created more problems than revenue.
So yes, the whole smoking thing is handled a little uneven. They want the money, but don't want the smoke itself.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.