As the White House continues a campaign of retaliation against so-called ‘sanctuary cities’ — and San Mateo County’s neighbors fight back — the minutiae and meaning of immigration policy on a local, state and federal level is under increasing scrutiny.
In San Mateo County, a 2023 ordinance prohibits the use of county funds for cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. And Sheriff Christina Corpus recently affirmed that deputies working on behalf of the Sheriff’s Office will never ask for a resident’s immigration status or allow federal access to jail release information.
No state or local sanctuary policy can prevent an organization like ICE from deporting undocumented individuals, however.
“The ordinance does not stop or protect an individual from deportation,” David Canepa, San Mateo County Board of Supervisors president, said. “It simply ensures the country is not using its own resources to assist ICE, an agency that already has a $90 billion budget to do their job.”
San Mateo County doesn’t call itself a sanctuary county — it is a certified “welcoming county,” Chief Communications Officer Michelle Durand said — though that might not matter, Canepa said.
“Although we never declared ourselves as a sanctuary county, that might not be how the Department of Justice or the Trump administration may see it, and that may be a potential concern,” he said.
The American Immigration Council notes that while no legal or standard definition of the term sanctuary policy exists, it is often used in reference to a state or locality’s cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities.
And because the entire state of California already has a so-called sanctuary policy in place prohibiting local and state agencies from cooperating with ICE, any pressure might not be on San Mateo County in specific but rather the state as a whole, Canepa said.
“I do think that California, collectively, is seen as a potential target because of Senate Bill 54,” he said.
As part of President Trump’s immigration crackdown, a Jan. 20 executive order, entitled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” calls for so-called sanctuary jurisdictions not to receive any federal funding. The administration has expounded on that executive order in recent days, suing the city of Chicago for its sanctuary city policies.
But blue jurisdictions, including neighboring counties like San Francisco and Santa Clara, are fighting back, alleging that the Trump administration’s war against sanctuary jurisdictions and threats to withhold federal funding are unlawful.
That’s likely not a tactic San Mateo County will be taking for now, Canepa said, though he acknowledged how quickly the political landscape has been shifting in recent weeks makes it challenging to rule any one action out.
“I just think with the federal government, communication is going to be key,” he said. “I think there may be better ways diplomatically to see what we can do to communicate with the administration.”
The Trump administration’s legal fights and executive orders are one part of a multifaceted mechanism to install fear in immigrant communities and embolden nativist and hateful rhetoric, Ayudando Latinos A Soñar Assistant Director Enrique Bazán said.
“It is symbolic, Trump going after the migrants,” he said. “Now we’re getting hate mail, postcards … that’s not people from the government or ICE. That’s people that feel enabled.”
As a coastside cultural arts and programming organization, ALAS is aiming to make San Mateo County immigrant communities feel safer by responding to rapid response reports and rumors of ICE. So far in the county, there have been no mass deportation raids, Bazán said, though they’re preparing for the possibility.
Though they can help individuals know their rights, obtain legal representation and see their families, the tangible assistance in deportation cases is often with family members and loved ones who remain in the United States, Bazán said.
“What if that person is the breadwinner of the family? What’s going to happen with the family, with food, with health care, taking the child to school?” he said. “It’s nonprofits and community responsibility to respond to the needs of those people.”
Any immigrant going through legal processes in the United States should feel confident in the fact that they deserve to be treated with dignity, Bazán said.
“If we feel humiliated there is something wrong, and there is a system of community response — because nobody should be humiliated in this country,” he said.
And when it comes to sanctuary, Bazán emphasized the ways that communities can create those feelings of safety and love to the extent possible within their own capacity.
“How do we interconnect [with] each other? What are the micro and macro things that we do within our own community, our own family?” he said.
(4) comments
Speaking of an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, how about the Felon in the Oval Office? The one who refused to put his hand on the bible while taking the Oath, knowing he would not uphold it? The one defying Congress and the Courts to take over our free United States with an all powerful monarchical Executive branch without any oversight or control? The one letting an unhinged immigrant take over our Federal data and put it in the hands of high school tech bros? Here's what anyone opposed to living in a sanctuary city should do - MOVE. To Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, or other like-minded states. And stop taking California tax dollars in those states as well. Problem solved.
SMpool - I urge you to make an appointment with the nearest cardiologist. Let us know how you will fare. Surely you were comfortable the last four years with being misled and taken for a patsy. But that was your choice, I feel for you and many of us pray for you.
Thanks, SMpool, for another rabid leftie serving of hysterical screeching and for reminding us what winning feels like. Delicious. May I have another? Please cite a current law that requires folks taking an Oath to put their hand on a bible or anything else. You’re repeating lame debunked Democrat talking points. Maybe you should replace the "p" in your username to an "f" because you're definitely not passing, but failing. For those who don’t like what our (yes, our) great President Trump is doing – MOVE out of the country. Problem solved. Thank you in advance. Have a Trump-tastic day.
To borrow from Hillary Clinton, “What difference at this point does it make?” The bottom line is that so-called leaders who submit their voters to sanctuary city (or whatever you want to call them) policies are failing their oath to support and defend and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States. Their “resistance” borders on traitorous behavior and serves only to place criminals above American citizens. Let’s resist their resistance and do what’s right for America.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.