Editor,
In response to the San Mateo planning commissioner’s letter published on May 1, I offer a few clarifications.
Editor,
In response to the San Mateo planning commissioner’s letter published on May 1, I offer a few clarifications.
At its April 21 study session, the San Mateo City Council did not kick renters to the curb in favor of wealthy interests. Instead, based on facts presented, the council directed staff to explore creating an emergency housing assistance fund to help prevent residents encountering financial difficulties from being evicted. One of the facts presented was that in the past year there were roughly 100 evictions from some 10,000 housing units in San Mateo (about 1%). The majority of these evictions were for nonpayment of rent. Adding layers of regulation on housing providers will not cure this problem.
Moreover, most of the housing providers in San Mateo are not “the wealthy” but are “mom-and-pop” investors.
The tenant protections proposed by city staff were over and above Assembly Bill 1482, also known as the California Tenant Protection Act of 2019, which established a statewide rent cap and eviction protections for most residential rental units in California. AB 1482 was a compromise reached by tenant rights activists and the housing provider industry. It was described by Gov. Newsom as providing the strongest tenant protections in the nation.
Apparently, there are some in San Mateo who are unwilling to live with a compromise and won’t rest until they force many small landlords out of the housing business. Fortunately, the San Mateo City Council understands this and elected to pursue a more practical and equitable solution.
Brian Ponty
San Carlos
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Hey, Brian... thanks for writing an LTE on an important topic. We don't hear enough from you. Maybe Jon Mays could use another columnist.
Two years ago, the City of San Mateo was embroiled in a controversy that pitted possibly the most opportunistic tenants in the county against a "mom-and-pop" landlord. The City's staff wrongly sided with the tenants and presented the property owner with a $12,000 bill to relocate the tenants. Fortunately, the San Mateo City Council reversed the staff's actions. I saw this as a positive step by the Council to bring practical and equitable solutions to housing business issues in San Mateo.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.