As the Sheriff’s Office navigates administration challenges, Sheriff Christina Corpus addressed what she referred to as “serious political dirt dealings” from county officials, and announced Matthew Fox as the new assistant sheriff.

The Sheriff’s Office is navigating significant executive team changes, unfair labor practice allegations, and a vote of no confidence by labor unions in Chief of Staff Victor Aenlle.

Recommended for you

ana@smdailyjournal.com

(65) 344-5200 ext. 106

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Ray Fowler

Thanks, Ana, for writing another article on this important topic.

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” Hamlet (1.4.95) Maybe something is rotten in the Sheriff’s Office or the County Executive’s Office. We’ll see.

Sheriff Christina Corpus is calling for an independent investigation into her claim of interference, intimidation, and impropriety by County Executive Mike Callagy. That’s fair, but are there some things the Sheriff can do to help sort out this dispute?

The DSA’s leadership has made a claim that HR complaints have been filed against the Sheriff’s Chief of Staff, Victor Aenlle. The Chief of Staff retorts there are no such reports. The Sheriff, without betraying the confidentiality of any persons who may have submitted an HR report or the substance of any such reports, can confirm whether the Deputy Sheriff’s Association’s claim is true. The rank and file have also suggested the Chief of Staff is wearing a uniform and badge that he is not entitled to wear. Assuming the Sheriff’s Office has a policy prescribing proper standards for wearing uniforms, the Sheriff can direct an internal investigation to determine if the Chief of Staff has violated any policy. While the results of such an inquiry would not be made public, it would determine whether the Chief of Staff, who no longer serves as a reserve deputy, has authority to wear a uniform. Finally, the DSA has asserted the Chief of Staff has engaged in union busting. As the top law enforcement official in our county, the Sheriff can meet with the leadership of the DSA with or without the County Executive in attendance to listen to the rank and file’s perception that the Chief of Staff has violated labor relations laws. Perhaps if the Sheriff had met with the unions earlier, there would have been no reason to conduct a vote of no confidence for the Chief of Staff.

Are there some things the Sheriff can do to help sort out this dispute instead of laying blame on the County Executive and calling into question the judgment of County Supervisors? Drama belongs in the theater not 400 County Center. I think ol’ Will Shakespeare would agree.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here