Whoever is elected to the San Mateo City Council in November will have no shortage of hot-button items to balance — from addressing current residents’ concerns and preparing for future growth to balancing the city’s budget and considering regional traffic pressures.

Six City Council candidates highlighted their credentials and expressed a litany of ideas, many similar but a few distinct, during endorsement interviews with the Daily Journal.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(12) comments

Mr Eddy

We need to vote for the city council that actually supports the quality of life and vote out the incumbents that approved these ugly high density projects. The people of San Mateo should be represented by members who want to help our community and our town.

jack bauer

Many interesting posts here. Thank you, posters! As for Joe Goethals, it's interesting how he wants to keep SM a welcoming city. Considering that this area has several criminal gangs comprised of illegal aliens, it would seem that SM may be too welcoming which is ironic since Goethals works in the DA's office.

Christopher Conway

I would like to have a rent control forum. I would like each candidate to clearly state their position on rent control and their position on attaching regulations to private property. I think any of the candidates can answer that very simple question right here on this fine website. It is a key issue among many of their constituents and we would like a clear understanding on how you think prior to our vote.

mnboy

What a charade! As if there's any chance the endorsements will go to anyone but the incumbents, and one of the two candidates that are already part of the San Mateo political machine, Rodriguez or Drechsler. Sue Lempert couldn't even be bothered to acknowledge the existence of two of the candidates, and the Daily Journal provided zero coverage of the candidates forum held last week at City Hall.
Pathetic.

vincent wei

It would be funny if it wasn't so serious...I guess the Fairness Doctrine doesn't apply to print media...but the lack of coverage of all of the candidates is a real cause for concern amongst fair minded voters...

vincent wei

I love all of the cliche's that the candidates expressed. It's a shame they didn't honor them while in office.

Lisa

Really?! It's the "jobs-housing imbalance" which is "threatening the quality of life for which San Mateo is known?" And here I thought it was the imbalance of infrastructure and decent public transportation with all the stack and pack housing that is getting green-lighted at every turn.

Michael Stogner

Mark De Paula is a Concerned Citizen Candidate. He has consistently refused to be endorsed by any Special Interest Groups or Business. He is for Local Control and for the residents who live in San Mateo now. He is the Gridlock Candidate. He is Opposed to ABAG, ICLEI and One Bay Area Plan.

MJD

Samantha Weigel of SMDJ sent me this e-mail below for an endorsement interview, I refused and see my e-mail to her below.
If Samantha said I would like to interview you, that would be different.
One of my major issues is a building moratorium. The city of San Mateo has gridlock not traffic.

Hi Mark,

I’d like to invite you to participate in the San Mateo Daily Journal’s endorsement interview process for the San Mateo City Council race.

Myself and our Editor in Chief Jon Mays will be hosting interviews with each candidate separately. The meeting should take about 20 to 30 minutes and will be held at our office located at 1900 Alameda de las Pulgas, San Mateo.

Are you available at 2 p.m. Thursday Sept. 21?

Following the interviews, the paper will announce its endorsement of three candidates Sept. 27.

Please let me know if you’re interested in participating.

Thank you,

Samantha Weigel
Senior Reporter
San Mateo Daily Journal
650-344-5200
Twitter: @samantha_weigel

BenToy

":.......One of my major issues is a building moratorium. The city of San Mateo has gridlock not traffic....."

You should consider the bigger picture of which your comment speaks to...

Ask "why is there gridlock" and then look for the root cause, instead of just complaining about the gridlock...

'Most' of the drivers out there in the gridlock traffic congestion are #1 in the morning leaving their bedrooms on the east bay to go work over here on the Peninsula...#2 in the evening leaving their jobs over here on the Peninsula to go back home to their bedrooms on the east bay.,

By not allowing more bedrooms over here on the Peninsula is just fueling the congestion (gridlock), as the economy will continue to generate new jobs over here on the Peninsula.

Some have asked me to try and get more companies to move to the east bay...yeah right...try telling a multi billion buck corporation to move out of the hot bed area of the Peninsula to a lesser area where the risk not doing as well is high

Smart growth is the key. That then means TOD and High Density areas (of which were in play decades...centuries BEFORE the advent of automotive travel) and leave the R1 areas alone as much as we can

That then means a change in our PW's and Planning department philosophies. Vision Zero for PW's and Form Based Code for Planning...but that is foreign to many...both within the city staff and public. A good friend coined and spot on: "They are stuck in the Nixon Era"...AKA...we are in the 21st Century and they are stuck in the 20th Century...

vincent wei

Ben...sounds as if you are actually part of the imbalance problem of which you speak ...so maybe you should recuse yourself because you clearly have a financial interest in "adding more bedrooms"?

Cindy Cornell

MEET THE CANDIDATES! One San Mateo will be hosting a Candidates Forum on Sunday, October 1st at 7:00 p.m. at Congregational Church of San Mateo. Open to the public.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here