Whoever is elected to the San Mateo City Council in November will have no shortage of hot-button items to balance — from addressing current residents’ concerns and preparing for future growth to balancing the city’s budget and considering regional traffic pressures.
Six City Council candidates highlighted their credentials and expressed a litany of ideas, many similar but a few distinct, during endorsement interviews with the Daily Journal.
Three open seats on the council are being sought by Rick Bonilla, Chelsea Bonini, Charlie Drechsler, Joe Goethals, Robert Newsom, Eric Rodriguez and Mark De Paula. Bonilla and Goethals are incumbents and Mayor David Lim is not seeking re-election.
Bonilla, the current vice mayor, said he’s interested in preparing for the regional demands of growth through transit-focused development. He believes the jobs-housing imbalance is threatening the quality of life for which San Mateo is known.
“I think thoughtful planning that takes into account the needs and desires of the neighborhood can be successful,” Bonilla said, later adding he’s concerned about under-represented communities and the city should strive for an “inclusive community where people accept each other.”
Bonini, who serves on the San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District Board of Trustees, said she wants to represent a wide spectrum of residents and be a voice for those who feel their opinions aren’t being heard.
“I’m running for council because I care about our community, I think I represent a broad cross section of views that make up our community,” Bonini said. “I have a pretty strong reputation of listening to my constituents.”
Drechsler, a planning commissioner and Redwood City’s arborist, said he recognizes there has been an influx of development and a lot going on in the city. He would like to see a broader cross section of the community engaged as the city faces market demands and financial obligations.
“Our outreach, study sessions need to be a packed house,” Drechsler said. “Everything from the sewage treatment plant to traffic congestion. … There’s just so much going on that I want to make sure everyone’s voice is heard.”
Goethals, a current councilman and prosecutor with the District Attorney’s Office, said he wants to maintain the city’s character while balancing the need to address affordability concerns and ensure San Mateo remains a welcoming place.
“The idea that all politics is local is still true, and every neighborhood has issues we can address,” Goethals said. “Government has the power and opportunity to do good once in a while and I think that’s what we’re doing in San Mateo.”
Newsom, who works for an alternative transportation company, said he was motivated to run because he recognizes the city has undergone a lot of change in a short period of time and wants to be a bridge for constituents.
“People are really frustrated in that they feel like the growth has snuck up on us,” Newsom said. “I believe in a servant-leader model of trying to help people and help lead the way … and be a voice for the people who don’t seem to have one.”
Rodriguez, a planning commissioner who owns a downtown tech company, said a financial skill set is underrepresented on the council and he wants to help guide the city. Close to various neighborhood associations, Rodriguez said he hopes to balance the needs of the present and the future.
“We have many challenges on our horizon that do not have black and white answers and are very complex and I’m concerned for how are we as a city going to protect that quality of life not only for current residents but future generations,” Rodriguez said.
De Paula opted not to participate in the interview process stating he was not seeking endorsements.
Balancing growth
Recommended for you
Managing the impacts of growth was a top issue for candidates. Whoever is elected to the council will be tasked with reviewing the Downtown Plan Update as well as the city’s height and density restrictions outlined in the voter-approved Measure P, which is slated to expire in 2020.
Bonini said she’s been surprised to hear people describe San Mateo as urban and believes it’s critical to preserve the suburban nature the city and its history. She agreed it’s important to be discussing height limits and suggested the decision be left to voters. Acutely aware and concerned about the effects of the affordability crisis, she said it’s imperative to find a path forward following the failure of tenant protections and would prioritize housing over office growth.
Drechsler said it’s important to think of the city holistically and keep future generations in mind. He supports transit-oriented development and being creative with mixed-use designs, especially in downtown. He said the city should look at the recipe of density and floor-area ratio and consider where changes could be appropriate while being sensitive to existing neighbors. Ultimately, he believes economic development and improving connections to downtown will be important to its success.
Goethals said understanding retail market trends and making pedestrian improvements in downtown is key. He noted the city-owned redevelopment lots at the southeastern edge of downtown present a unique opportunity for parking and workforce housing. He believes there is room in the rail and transit corridor for increased density or heights up to 75 feet with community benefits. But ultimately residents’ input is vital and voters should be asked to decide height and density restrictions, Goethals said.
Newsom said he supports measured growth and more housing is needed to address rising unaffordability. While supportive of transit-oriented building such as along El Camino Real, he doesn’t want to shoehorn developments where they don’t fit and said infrastructure upgrades must coincide. He would also like to see mixed-use as part of downtown’s growth but noted there are other business districts that also need attention such as 25th and 42nd avenues.
Rodriguez said he believes there’s room to reform current building restrictions but generally supports keeping height limits in place. But he recognizes tough issues require compromise and further community discussion is needed. He’s concerned about major changes to downtown and suggested expanding the current historical district protections while further engaging businesses in the planning process. He’s mindful of growth for workforce housing needs and pedestrian safety.
Bonilla said the city should strive to promote smart growth and certain areas like near the downtown train station may be capable of accommodating denser or perhaps taller structures. He hopes San Mateo can remain forward thinking by encouraging transit-oriented development, improve pedestrian safety and be mindful of disenfranchised residents who may be fearful to speak out. Downtown’s historic districts must be preserved, protecting neighborhood character is key and ultimately it’s about following the people’s mandate, Bonilla said.
Congestion, business and community
Drechsler said congestion relief should include employers getting creative with transportation demand management plans, rethinking work spaces and promoting corporate buses. He wants to promote economic development while staying away from having overly burdensome regulations or fees. The city should make customer service its number one goal and recognize its cultural diversity, he added.
Goethals said even incremental improvements can increase traffic flow and individual communities must do their part to reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips when possible. He said San Mateo must fight to preserve all of its Caltrain stations, improve El Camino Real and engage employers. Every neighborhood has its own unique needs and traffic calming improvements, assisting with child care options and enhancing recreation is vital to working families’ quality of life, Goethals said.
Newsom said promoting mass transit connectivity, considering ways to bring the various modes together and working with employers on alternate transportation options is vital to address congestion. The city and Chamber of Commerce should work to promote small businesses while encouraging residents to shop local. Expanding after-school and day care options, recreation opportunities, maintaining public safety and promoting sustainability are ways the city can support families, Newsom said.
Rodriguez said San Mateo needs better representation on regional transportation boards to help drive the discussion of transit solutions. The city needs to support local businesses, especially following a minimum wage increase; which could include shop local drives and promoting foot traffic by closing portions of B Street to vehicles for a part of Sundays. He’s very concerned about unfunded pension liabilities and suggests the city look at new revenue opportunities. At the end of the day, the council’s priorities must include fixing public infrastructure, making sure resident are safe and balancing the city’s budget, he said.
Bonilla said he’s a member of the county’s congestion-relief agency Commute.org and noted the importance of Caltrain electrification and grade separations. The city must follow up with developers or employers on transportation demand management plans and he believes we should consider taxing large businesses for transit needs. He would also like to expand the city’s revenue base and use San Mateo’s redevelopment properties for public employee housing. He is very concerned about residents living in unsanitary conditions while too fearful to report building code violations.
Bonini said the lack of housing and a regional transportation system that isn’t easy to get from one place to another is congestion’s culprit. Supporting businesses could include easing up on fees, and finding ways to address housing affordability is critical for middle-income families. Her priorities include stabilizing the diverse community, supporting the community as a whole while collaborating with other agencies and school districts, and making sure City Hall is a place where everyone feels welcome.
(650) 344-5200 ext. 106
Twitter: @samantha_weigel

(12) comments
We need to vote for the city council that actually supports the quality of life and vote out the incumbents that approved these ugly high density projects. The people of San Mateo should be represented by members who want to help our community and our town.
Many interesting posts here. Thank you, posters! As for Joe Goethals, it's interesting how he wants to keep SM a welcoming city. Considering that this area has several criminal gangs comprised of illegal aliens, it would seem that SM may be too welcoming which is ironic since Goethals works in the DA's office.
I would like to have a rent control forum. I would like each candidate to clearly state their position on rent control and their position on attaching regulations to private property. I think any of the candidates can answer that very simple question right here on this fine website. It is a key issue among many of their constituents and we would like a clear understanding on how you think prior to our vote.
What a charade! As if there's any chance the endorsements will go to anyone but the incumbents, and one of the two candidates that are already part of the San Mateo political machine, Rodriguez or Drechsler. Sue Lempert couldn't even be bothered to acknowledge the existence of two of the candidates, and the Daily Journal provided zero coverage of the candidates forum held last week at City Hall.
Pathetic.
It would be funny if it wasn't so serious...I guess the Fairness Doctrine doesn't apply to print media...but the lack of coverage of all of the candidates is a real cause for concern amongst fair minded voters...
I love all of the cliche's that the candidates expressed. It's a shame they didn't honor them while in office.
Really?! It's the "jobs-housing imbalance" which is "threatening the quality of life for which San Mateo is known?" And here I thought it was the imbalance of infrastructure and decent public transportation with all the stack and pack housing that is getting green-lighted at every turn.
Mark De Paula is a Concerned Citizen Candidate. He has consistently refused to be endorsed by any Special Interest Groups or Business. He is for Local Control and for the residents who live in San Mateo now. He is the Gridlock Candidate. He is Opposed to ABAG, ICLEI and One Bay Area Plan.
Samantha Weigel of SMDJ sent me this e-mail below for an endorsement interview, I refused and see my e-mail to her below.
If Samantha said I would like to interview you, that would be different.
One of my major issues is a building moratorium. The city of San Mateo has gridlock not traffic.
Hi Mark,
I’d like to invite you to participate in the San Mateo Daily Journal’s endorsement interview process for the San Mateo City Council race.
Myself and our Editor in Chief Jon Mays will be hosting interviews with each candidate separately. The meeting should take about 20 to 30 minutes and will be held at our office located at 1900 Alameda de las Pulgas, San Mateo.
Are you available at 2 p.m. Thursday Sept. 21?
Following the interviews, the paper will announce its endorsement of three candidates Sept. 27.
Please let me know if you’re interested in participating.
Thank you,
Samantha Weigel
Senior Reporter
San Mateo Daily Journal
650-344-5200
Twitter: @samantha_weigel
":.......One of my major issues is a building moratorium. The city of San Mateo has gridlock not traffic....."
You should consider the bigger picture of which your comment speaks to...
Ask "why is there gridlock" and then look for the root cause, instead of just complaining about the gridlock...
'Most' of the drivers out there in the gridlock traffic congestion are #1 in the morning leaving their bedrooms on the east bay to go work over here on the Peninsula...#2 in the evening leaving their jobs over here on the Peninsula to go back home to their bedrooms on the east bay.,
By not allowing more bedrooms over here on the Peninsula is just fueling the congestion (gridlock), as the economy will continue to generate new jobs over here on the Peninsula.
Some have asked me to try and get more companies to move to the east bay...yeah right...try telling a multi billion buck corporation to move out of the hot bed area of the Peninsula to a lesser area where the risk not doing as well is high
Smart growth is the key. That then means TOD and High Density areas (of which were in play decades...centuries BEFORE the advent of automotive travel) and leave the R1 areas alone as much as we can
That then means a change in our PW's and Planning department philosophies. Vision Zero for PW's and Form Based Code for Planning...but that is foreign to many...both within the city staff and public. A good friend coined and spot on: "They are stuck in the Nixon Era"...AKA...we are in the 21st Century and they are stuck in the 20th Century...
Ben...sounds as if you are actually part of the imbalance problem of which you speak ...so maybe you should recuse yourself because you clearly have a financial interest in "adding more bedrooms"?
MEET THE CANDIDATES! One San Mateo will be hosting a Candidates Forum on Sunday, October 1st at 7:00 p.m. at Congregational Church of San Mateo. Open to the public.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.