The Foster City Council joined San Mateo in expressing skepticism over a controversial project that would add a connecting lane between State Route 92 and Highway 101.
Last month, the San Mateo City Council penned a letter to various agencies and representatives — including the San Mateo County Transportation Authority and Caltrans — asking them to "seriously reconsider" the currently proposed project, noting particular concern with eminent domain, equity impacts from toll lanes, environmental effects and the lack of communication with residents.
During a Foster City meeting May 19, councilmembers voiced concern as well, though no official action was taken to sign on to San Mateo's letter.
The 92/101 connector lane project has been a discussion topic for years, with transit agencies such as the Transportation Authority stating it could reduce congestion and improve safety by using a new ramp connector to get from one freeway to another. The lane would be similar to the current Highway 101 express lanes, which employ a demand pricing model, though high-occupancy vehicles would be exempt or receive a discount.
However, Foster City councilmembers Phoebe Venkat and Suzy Niederhofer said there should be more focus on providing transit connections for congestion relief, rather than building an additional highway lane.
"I really think that if we're going to make real progress, it needs to be a long-term project that we focus on that shows it will definitely impact [congestion], and that we have data that show that," Venkat said. "What I'm hearing a lot is around wanting more options for transit, like the cross-Bay transit options. That will really help a lot with the traffic coming from East Bay to the Peninsula to the southern Peninsula."
Recommended for you
Agency officials are contemplating a few options. One would add a direct connection from westbound State Route 92 to both directions of the Highway 101 express lanes, which could mitigate morning congestion; a connection from the Highway 101 express lanes to eastbound State Route 92 to alleviate evening traffic; or a reversible lane that could serve both morning and evening demands.
While the project is still in the early stages, it originally involved acquiring more than 30 parcels of private property via eminent domain, which stipulates that owners may have to sell their land under certain circumstances, provided it will be used for public use.
However, the TA said the current proposal options wouldn't take any houses or parks, but could involve taking portions of property. The two areas in question are in San Mateo, on the southwest side of Highway 101, in the Fiesta Gardens neighborhood south of State Route 92, and on the northeast side of Highway 101, in the Shoreview neighborhood north of State Route 92.
Foster City Mayor Stacy Jimenez said that while she has some concerns over the project, she would be supportive of it if there is a clear indication it could improve emergency access routes.
"We know that it's very difficult for us to get into or out of Foster City, so if this project has the potential to aid in emergency situations then I am all in," Jimenez said.
Funding for the entire project is uncertain. The initial $200 million estimate is several years old, and the price tag will likely be higher. Updated cost estimates will be released with the draft environmental impact report, which is expected to be circulated for public comment and feedback in the fall of 2026.
There are still council members, SMCTA Board members and traffic engineers making the false - and now illegal - claim that highway expansion improves Los-Of-Service (LOS aka "congestion"). It cannot - hence this law now.
Adding more cars does not reduce air pollution, asthma or climate change. Just as inventing even more ultra processed food does not relief obesity. Adding more fentanyl does not relief the opioid epidemic. Adding more vaping flavors does not reduce lung cancer rates.
The new law SB743 (2013) requires MTC, SMCTA and Caltrans to prove that this project can reduce Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) and air pollution. Otherwise CEQA is not fulfilled and the EIR cannot be approved. The only way VMT can be reduced is by taking away lanes, implementing congestion pricing, improving public transit, installing bike lanes - there are not really other ways.
So both San Mateo and much of Foster City is opposed to this project. Hopefully, County leaders decide that our precious taxpayer dollars are better spent on other transportation priorities.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
There are still council members, SMCTA Board members and traffic engineers making the false - and now illegal - claim that highway expansion improves Los-Of-Service (LOS aka "congestion"). It cannot - hence this law now.
Adding more cars does not reduce air pollution, asthma or climate change. Just as inventing even more ultra processed food does not relief obesity. Adding more fentanyl does not relief the opioid epidemic. Adding more vaping flavors does not reduce lung cancer rates.
The new law SB743 (2013) requires MTC, SMCTA and Caltrans to prove that this project can reduce Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) and air pollution. Otherwise CEQA is not fulfilled and the EIR cannot be approved. The only way VMT can be reduced is by taking away lanes, implementing congestion pricing, improving public transit, installing bike lanes - there are not really other ways.
https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/driving-congestion-environment/sb-743-los-vmt-transition
So both San Mateo and much of Foster City is opposed to this project. Hopefully, County leaders decide that our precious taxpayer dollars are better spent on other transportation priorities.
Joe - Agree! And, who even ordered this study in the first place? I'll bet that wasn't cheap on the taxpayer's dime either.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.